Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anterior vertebroplasty of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement

  • Ideas and Technical Innovations
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new method, which should help to avoid cage subsidence after vertebrectomy in short fusions. After implantation of an extendable vertebral body replacement (VBR) the two adjacent endplates to the fractured or destroyed vertebra were augmented with bone cement using the anterior approach in 20 patients with short circumferential fusion. All patients were followed up for 2 years clinically and radiographically. X-rays were reviewed for kyphosis, cage subsidence, presence of a solid fusion mass and instrumentation failure. Changes in every day activities (Oswestry Disability Index-ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS), pain score, as well as technique-related complications were examined. The mean amount of kyphosis correction was 12.8° (±6.4°) and changed by only 0.3° (±0.4°) until last follow-up. Pain (VAS) and ODI scores were significantly improved and did not change until last follow-up. In all but two cases, the authors observed solid union with incorporation of the cage. No surgery-related complications were recorded. In one case revision was advised because of non-union due to septic loosening. The augmentation of the adjacent vertebras after anterior VBR provides an enhancement of the interface between cage and vertebra in cases with poor bone quality and in revision surgery. The technique is simple and safe, as the needles can be placed under visual control. Cement augmentation of the endplates may reduce interbody device subsidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129

  2. Anekstein Y, Brosh T, Mirovsky Y (2007) Intermediate screws in short segment pedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar fractures: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker S, Chavanne A, Spitaler R, Kropik K, Aigner N, Ogon M, Redl H (2008) Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines. Eur Spine J 17:1462–1469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briem D, Linhart W, Lehmann W, Bullinger M, Schoder V, Meenen NM, Windolf J, Rueger JM (2003) Investigation of the health-related quality of life after a dorso ventral stabilization of the thoracolumbar junction. Unfallchirurg 106:625–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH (2008) Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E317–E324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Defino HL, Rodriguez-Fuentes AE (1998) Treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine by combined anteroposterior fixation using the Harms method. Eur Spine J 7:187–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Enad JG, Slakey JB, McNulty PS (2008) Measurement of thoracolumbar kyphosis after burst fracture: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and variability of 4 measurement methods. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 37:E60–E63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frankel BM, Jones T, Wang C (2007) Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: a clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 61:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalteis T, Luring C, Gugler G, Zysk S, Caro W, Handel M, Grifka J (2004) Acute tissue toxicity of PMMA bone cements. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:666–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim DH, Vaccaro AR (2006) Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment. Spine J 6:479–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim HS, Park SK, Joy H, Ryu JK, Kim SW, Ju CI (2008) Bone cement augmentation of short segment fixation for unstable burst fracture in severe osteoporosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 44:8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knop C, Fabian HF, Bastian L, Rosenthal H, Lange U, Zdichavsky M, Blauth M (2002) Fate of the transpedicular intervertebral bone graft after posterior stabilisation of thoracolumbar fractures. Eur Spine J 11:251–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Knop C, Kranabetter T, Reinhold M, Blauth M (2009) Combined posterior-anterior stabilisation of thoracolumbar injuries utilising a vertebral body replacing implant. Eur Spine J 18:949–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knop C, Lange U, Bastian L, Oeser M, Blauth M (2001) Biomechanical compression tests with a new implant for thoracolumbar vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J 10:30–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kostuik JP, Shapiro MB (2003) Open surgical treatment of osteoporotic fractures and deformity of the spine. Instr Course Lect 52:569–578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurth AA, Pfeilschifter J (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men. German Guidelines Update 2006. Orthopade 36:683–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lange U, Edeling S, Knop C, Bastian L, Oeser M, Krettek C, Blauth M (2007) Anterior vertebral body replacement with a titanium implant of adjustable height: a prospective clinical study. Eur Spine J 16:161–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowe TG, Hashim S, Wilson LA, O’Brien MF, Smith DA, Diekmann MJ, Trommeter J (2004) A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2389–2394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McArthur N, Kasperk C, Baier M, Tanner M, Gritzbach B, Schoierer O, Rothfischer W, Krohmer G, Hillmeier J, Kock HJ, Meeder PJ, Huber FX (2009) 1150 kyphoplasties over 7 years: indications, techniques, and intraoperative complications. Orthopedics 32:90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oda I, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, Kaneda K, McAfee PC (1999) The stability of reconstruction methods after thoracolumbar total spondylectomy. An in vitro investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1634–1638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pflugmacher R, Schleicher P, Schaefer J, Scholz M, Ludwig K, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Haas NP, Kandziora F (2004) Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine 41. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 29:1413–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schultheiss M, Sarkar M, Arand M, Kramer M, Wilke HJ, Kinzl L, Hartwig E (2005) Solvent-preserved, bovine cancellous bone blocks used for reconstruction of thoracolumbar fractures in minimally invasive spinal surgery-first clinical results. Eur Spine J 14:192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan JS, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Cripton PA, Oxland TR (2007) Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan JS, Singh S, Zhu QA, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Oxland TR (2008) The effect of cement augmentation and extension of posterior instrumentation on stabilization and adjacent level effects in the elderly spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2728–2740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulmar B, Richter M, Kelsch G, Cakir B, Puhl W, Huch K (2005) Distractible vertebral body replacement for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Belg 71:467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vieweg U, Solch O, Kalff R (2003) Vertebral body replacement system Synex in unstable burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine—a retrospective study with 30 patients. Zentralbl Neurochir 64:58–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wuisman PI, van DM, Staal H, Van Royen BJ (2000) Augmentation of (pedicle) screws with calcium apatite cement in patients with severe progressive osteoporotic spinal deformities: an innovative technique. Eur Spine J 9:528–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest exist. No author has any financial ties to the manufacturer of any product discussed in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Marienburgstr. 2, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany

    Florian Geiger, Konstantinos Kafchitsas, Michael Rauschmann & Michael Rauschmann

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    Konstantinos Kafchitsas

Authors
  1. Florian Geiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstantinos Kafchitsas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Rauschmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Geiger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geiger, F., Kafchitsas, K. & Rauschmann, M. Anterior vertebroplasty of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement. Eur Spine J 20, 1385–1392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1766-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1766-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation