Skip to main content
Log in

Five-year outcome of stand-alone fusion using carbon cages in cervical disc arthrosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003, in the Neurosurgery Department of Rome University o “Sapienza,” 167 patients underwent anterior surgery for cervical spondylodiscoarthrosis. The levels treated by the anterior stand-alone technique were: C3–C4 (11%), C4–C5 (19%), C5–C6 (40%), and C6–C7 (30%). All patients underwent left anterior presternocleidomastoid–precarotid approach, microdiscectomy, and interbody fusion using a carbon fiber cage filled with hydroxyapatite. All patients were discharged within 48 h after surgery with cervical orthosis. In one case, a hematoma of the surgical site occurred within 12 h of surgery; for this reason the patient underwent surgical revision and was discharged 4 days later. All patients have worn cervical orthosis for a mean period of 7 weeks and underwent radiological follow-up with cervical RX at 1 and 3 months after surgery. All patients underwent follow-up from 54 to 90 months after surgery, and all of them underwent cervical RX, cervical CT scans for the estimate of fusion, and evaluation of neurological status using VAS and NDI. Of 167 patients, 132 were cooperative for this study, 18 were non-cooperative, and 17 died. The estimation of fusion made by cervical CT scans with sagittal reconstruction showed complete osteointegration of the cage in 115 patients (87.1%), while it showed pseudoarthrosis in 17 patients (12.9%). In 24 patients, we observed adjacent segment degeneration, and 13 of these underwent new surgical procedures in this institute or in another hospital. Clinical evaluation with VAS and NDI showed a good outcome, with poorest benefit in patients over 60 years. The clinical analysis showed a good fusion rate in according with literature, 13% of non-fusion rate without clinical evidence and 20% of ASDegeneration but only 10% had required new surgery. We also observed that patients over 60 years of age had less satisfactory outcome, probably related with the evolution of pathophysiological degeneration of the cervical spine. In the opinion, pseudoarthrosis is caused by malpositioning of the carbon fiber cage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey RW, Badgeley MD (1960) Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 42-A(4):565–594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson RA, Smith GW (1995) Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 96:223–224

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 15:602–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brantingan J, Steffee A, Geiger J (1991) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody fusion. Mechanical testing. Spine 16(S6):277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brantingan J (1992) The use of carbon fiber implant in reconstructing anterior spinal column defects. Orthop Trans 16:139–140

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2(7889):1127–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14(7):409–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawin PD, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH (1998) A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity of autogenic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions. J Neurosurg 88:255–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Younger EM, Chapman MW (1989) Morbidity at bone graft sites. J Orthop Trauma 3:192–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tancredi A, Agrillo A, Delfini R, Fiume D, Frati A, Rinaldi A (2004) Use of carbon fiber cages for treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathies. Surg Neurol 61:221–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohler J, Gaudernak T (1980) Anterior plate stabilization for fracture dislocation of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma 20:203–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurg 25:491–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser JF et al (2007) Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates. Neurosurg Spine 6:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S et al (1993) Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine 18:2167–2173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 84:519–528

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sagawara T, Itoh Y, Hirano Y, Mizoi K (2009) Long term out come and adjacent disc degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium cylindrical cages. Acta Neurochir 151:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCormick PC (2007) The adjacent segment. J Neurosurg Spine 6:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Marotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marotta, N., Landi, A., Tarantino, R. et al. Five-year outcome of stand-alone fusion using carbon cages in cervical disc arthrosis. Eur Spine J 20 (Suppl 1), 8–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1747-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1747-0

Keywords

Navigation