Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical application of computer-designed polystyrene models in complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical treatment of complex severe spinal deformity, involving a scoliosis Cobb angle of more than 90° and kyphosis or vertebral and rib deformity, is challenging. Preoperative two-dimensional images resulting from plain film radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging provide limited morphometric information. Although the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction CT with special software can view the stereo and rotate the spinal image on the screen, it cannot show the full-scale spine and cannot directly be used on the operation table. This study was conducted to investigate the application of computer-designed polystyrene models in the treatment of complex severe spinal deformity. The study involved 16 cases of complex severe spinal deformity treated in our hospital between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2007; the mean ± SD preoperative scoliosis Cobb angle was 118° ± 27°. The CT scanning digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) data sets of the affected spinal segments were collected for 3D digital reconstruction and rapid prototyping to prepare computer-designed polystyrene models, which were applied in the treatment of these cases. The computer-designed polystyrene models allowed 3D observation and measurement of the deformities directly, which helped the surgeon to perform morphological assessment and communicate with the patient and colleagues. Furthermore, the models also guided the choice and placement of pedicle screws. Moreover, the models were used to aid in virtual surgery and guide the actual surgical procedure. The mean ± SD postoperative scoliosis Cobb angle was 42° ± 32°, and no serious complications such as spinal cord or major vascular injury occurred. The use of computer-designed polystyrene models could provide more accurate morphometric information and facilitate surgical correction of complex severe spinal deformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman MJ (1999) The Visible Human Project: a resource for education. Acad Med 74:667–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ackerman MJ, Spitzer VM, Scherzinger AL, Whitlock DG (1995) The Visible Human data set: an image resource for anatomical visualization. Medinfo 8 Pt 2:1195–1198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aliabadi H, Grant G (2008) Congenital thoracolumbar spine deformities. Neurosurgery 63(3 Suppl):78–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang KW (2003) Cantilever bending technique for treatment of large and rigid scoliosis. Spine 28:2452–2458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Urso PS, Williamson OD, Thompson RG (2005) Biomodeling as an aid to spinal instrumentation. Spine 30:2841–2845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Facanha-Filho FA, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (2001) Measurement accuracy in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 83:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guarino J, Tennyson S, McCain G, Bond L, Shea K, King H (2007) Rapid prototyping technology for surgeries of the pediatric spine and pelvis: benefits analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 27:955–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Tezer M, Aydogan M, Sarier M, Talu U (2007) Simultaneous surgical treatment in congenital scoliosis and/or kyphosis associated with intraspinal abnormalities. Spine 32:2880–2884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedequist DJ (2007) Surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 38:497–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hedequist DJ, Emans JB (2003) The correlation of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions with operative findings in congenital scoliosis. Spine 28:2531–2534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lermusiaux P, Leroux C, Tasse JC et al (2001) Aortic aneurysm: construction of a life-size model by rapid prototyping. Ann Vasc Surg 15:131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liljenqvist UR, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L, Link TM, Steinbeck J, Halm HF (2002) Analysis of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with use of magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84:359–368

    Google Scholar 

  13. McMaster MJ (2006) Spinal growth and congenital deformity of the spine. Spine 31:2284–2287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizutani J, Matsubara T, Fukuoka M et al (2008) Application of full-scale three-dimensional models in patients with rheumatoid cervical spine. Eur Spine J 17:644–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newton PO, Hahn GW, Fricka KB et al (2002) Utility of three-dimensional and multiplanar reformatted computed tomography for evaluation of pediatric congenital spine abnormalities. Spine 27:844–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM, Ryken TC (2007) Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg 12:303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Polly DW Jr, Potter BK, Kuklo T et al (2004) Volumetric spinal canal intrusion: a comparison between thoracic pedicle screws and thoracic hooks. Spine 29:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Quadrani P, Pasini A, Mattiolli-Belmonte M et al (2005) High-resolution 3D scaffold model for engineered tissue fabrication using a rapid prototyping technique. Med Biol Eng Comput 43:196–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryken TC, Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM (2009) Image-based drill templates for cervical pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg Spine 10:21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salako F, Aubin CE, Fortin C et al (2002) Feasibility study of patient-specific surgical templates for the fixation of pedicle screws. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:419–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Venuti JM, Imielinska C, Molholt P (2004) New views of male pelvic anatomy: role of computer-generated 3D images. Clin Anat 17:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X et al (2008) A single posterior approach for multilevel modified vertebral column resection in adults with severe rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis: a retrospective study of 13 cases. Eur Spine J 17:361–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wettergreen MA, Bucklen BS, Sun W, Liebschner MA (2005) Computer-aided tissue engineering of a human vertebral body. Ann Biomed Eng 33:1333–1343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu M, Tinschert J, Augthun M et al (2001) Application of laser measuring, numerical simulation and rapid prototyping to titanium dental castings. Dent Mater 17:102–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Randal R. Betz, MD, for modifying the manuscript and providing guidance with the study. This work was supported by the Project of National Natural Science Foundation (50772132, 50830102),the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (2009AA02Z405) and the 11th Five Years Military Medicine and Health Project (2005jd0003).

Conflict of interest statement

No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, K., Wang, Y., Xiao, S. et al. Clinical application of computer-designed polystyrene models in complex severe spinal deformities: a pilot study. Eur Spine J 19, 797–802 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1359-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1359-0

Keywords

Navigation