Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dural ectasia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: quantitative assessment on magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To our knowledge, the assessment of dural sac diameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is not reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to find out if, dural ectasia occurs more frequently among patients with AIS, to define cut-off values for dural sac ratio and test the validity of such values. A total of 126 spine MRIs (79 patients with AIS and 47 control subjects) were included in this retrospective analysis (age range 7–25 years, 62% were females). Dural sac diameter (DSD) and vertebral body diameter (VBD) were estimated and dural sac ratio (DSR = DSD/VBD) was calculated at T5 and L3. DSR at T5 and L3 were 0.69 ± 0.12, and 0.52 ± 0.10, respectively, in patients with AIS compared with 0.62 ± 0.11, and 0.44 ± 0.07, respectively, in controls (P = 0.001 at T5 and <0.001 at L3). Our estimated cut-off values for DSR were 0.84 and 0.58 at T5 and L3, respectively. This resulted in 100% sensitivity compared with 74% when using the cut-off values proposed by Oosterhof et al. No statistically significant association was found between the occurrence of dural sac enlargement in patients with AIS and the severity of scoliotic deformity, the apical vertebral rotation, epidural fat thickness, occurrence of pain, neurological deficit, atypical scoliosis or rapid curve progression. Females were affected more frequently than males. As dural sac enlargement means thinning of the pedicles, we believe that the findings of this study have important clinical implications on the preoperative workup of AIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Paepe ADR, Dietz HC, Hennekam RCM, Pyeritz RE (1996) Revised diagnostic criteria for the Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 62:417–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oosterhof T, Groenink M, Hulsmans FJ, Mulder BJ, van der Wall EE, Smit R, Hennekam RC (2001) Quantitative assessment of dural ectasia as a marker for Marfan syndrome. Radiology 220:514–518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brant-Zawadski M, Chen M, Moore K, Salzman K, Osborn AG (2002) Pocket radiologist, spine. WB Saunders, Amirsys

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson RA, Lawton JO, Archer IA, Butt WP (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:8–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deacon P, Flood BM, Dickson RA (1984) Idiopathic scoliosis in three dimensions. A radiographic and morphometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 66:509–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor JR (1983) Scoliosis and growth. Patterns of asymmetry in normal vertebral growth. Acta Orthop Scand 54:596–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stokes IA, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2006) Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis––a test of the ‘vicious cycle’ pathogenetic hypothesis: summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis 1:16. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Agadir M, Sevastik B, Sevastik JA, Persson A, Isberg B (1988) Induction of scoliosis in the growing rabbit by unilateral rib-growth stimulation. Spine 13:1065–1069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Porter RW (2000) Idiopathic scoliosis: the relation between the vertebral canal and the vertebral bodies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1360–1366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knirsch W, Kurtz C, Haffner N, Langer M, Kececioglu D (2005) Normal values of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar spine (vertebral body and dural sac) in children measured by MRI. Pediatr Radiol 35:419–424. doi:10.1007/s00247-004-1382-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aaro S, Dahlborn M, Svensson L (1978) Estimation of vertebral rotation in structural scoliosis by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 19:990–992

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta R, Sharma R, Vashisht S, Ghandi D, Jayaswal AK, Dave PK, Berry M (1999) Magnetic resonance evaluation of idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Australas Radiol 43:461–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Soylen B, Hinz K, Prokein J, Becker H, Schmidtke J, Arslan-Kirchner M (2009) Performance of a new quantitative method for assessing dural ectasia in patients with FBN1 mutations and clinical features of Marfan syndrome. Neuroradiology 51:397–400. doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0508-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parent S, Labelle HL, Skalli Wea (2002) Thoracic pedicles morphometry in vertebrae from scoliotic spines. In: Abstract from the SRS 2002 annual meeting

  16. Abul-Kasim K, Overgaard A, Maly P, Ohlin A, Gunnarsson M, Sundgren PC (2009) Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Radiol 19:610–618. doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1178-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neuroradiology, Diagnostic Centre for Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden

    Kasim Abul-Kasim & Angelica Overgaard

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

    Acke Ohlin

Authors
  1. Kasim Abul-Kasim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelica Overgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Acke Ohlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasim Abul-Kasim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abul-Kasim, K., Overgaard, A. & Ohlin, A. Dural ectasia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: quantitative assessment on magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J 19, 754–759 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1355-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1355-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation