Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gait in thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: effect of surgery on gait mechanisms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For patients whose scoliosis progresses, surgery remains the ultimate way to correct and stabilise the deformity while maintaining as many mobile spinal segments as possible. In thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the spinal fusion has to be extended to the lumbar spine. The use of anterior spinal fusion (ASF) instead of the classic posterior fusion (PSF) may preserve more distal spinal levels in attempt to limit the consequences of surgery on trunk mobility. The effects of surgery on body shape, pain and the decompensation phenomenon have all been well evaluated. Very few studies have addressed the effect of ASF or PSF on basic activities, such as walking. Before any treatment, AIS patients already have reduced pelvis, hip and shoulder motion when walking at a normal speed compared with adolescents without scoliosis (control group). Additionally, they have longer contraction time of the lumbar and pelvic muscles leading to an excessive energy cost and reduced muscle efficiency. In addition, if these changes are associated with spinal stiffness, spinal fusion could further negatively affect this pre-surgical inefficient walk. The goals of this study were (a) to compare pre- and 1-year post-surgery conditions in order to assess the effects of spinal arthrodesis on gait parameters and (b) to compare the anterior versus the posterior surgical approaches. Nineteen young females with thoracolumbar/lumbar AIS were assessed by radiological and clinical examination and by conventional gait analysis before surgery and at almost 12 months after surgery. Seven subjects underwent surgery using ASF and 12 using PSF. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at spontaneous self-selected speed to record kinematic, electromyographic (EMG), mechanical and energetic measurements synchronously. Although it was expected that the instrumentation would modify the characteristics of normal walking, this study showed that surgery does not induce asymmetric gait or any significant differences between the ASP and the PSF surgery groups. One year after surgery, the changes observed consisted of improvements in the gait and mechanical parameters. In the PSF group, 11–14 vertebrae were fused while only 3–4 were fused in the ASF group. In both AIS groups, step length was increased by 4% and cadence reduced by 2%. There was a slight increase in pelvis and hip frontal motion. Only the transverse shoulder motion was mildly decreased by 1.5°. All the other gait parameters were left unchanged or were improved by surgery. Notably, the EMG timing activity did not change. The total muscular mechanical work (W tot) increased by 6% mainly due to the external work (W ext), i.e. the work performed by the body muscles to move the body in its surroundings. The energy cost, although showing a tendency towards a reduction, remained globally excessive, probably due to the excessive co-contraction of the lumbo-pelvic muscles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA, Marchetti PG, Ponte A, Savini R, Travaglini F, Binazzi R, Di Silvestre M (1986) Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Spine 11:784–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein RM, Hall JE (1998) Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 7:124–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH 3rd, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Shufflebarger HL, Jeszenszky D, Beele B (1999) Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:225–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bitan FD, Neuwirth MG, Kuflik PL, Casden A, Bloom N, Siddiqui S (2002) The use of short and rigid anterior instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis: a retrospective review of 24 cases. Spine 27:1553–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjerkreim I, Steen H, Brox JI (2007) Idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: evaluation 10 years after surgery. Spine 32:2103–2110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cobb J (1948) Outline for study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cordover AM, Betz RR, Clements DH, Bosacco SJ (1997) Natural history of adolescent thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis into adulthood. J Spinal Disord 10:193–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2003) Back pain and function 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case–control study-part II. Spine 28:E373–E383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2001) Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of brace and surgical treatment with matching control group of straight individuals. Spine 26:516–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL (2006) Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case–control study. Spine 31:275–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J 10:278–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Detrembleur C, Dierick F, Stoquart G, Chantraine F, Lejeune T (2003) Energy cost, mechanical work, and efficiency of hemiparetic walking. Gait Posture 18:47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Detrembleur C, van den Hecke A, Dierick F (2000) Motion of the body centre of gravity as a summary indicator of the mechanics of human pathological gait. Gait Posture 12:243–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Detrembleur C, Vanmarsenille JM, De Cuyper F, Dierick F (2005) Relationship between energy cost, gait speed, vertical displacement of centre of body mass and efficiency of pendulum-like mechanism in unilateral amputee gait. Gait Posture 21:333–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dierick F, Penta M, Renaut D, Detrembleur C (2004) A force measuring treadmill in clinical gait analysis. Gait Posture 20:299–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Engsberg JR, Lenke LG, Uhrich ML, Ross SA, Bridwell KH (2003) Prospective comparison of gait and trunk range of motion in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis undergoing anterior or posterior spinal fusion. Spine 28:1993–2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE (2008) Scoliosis: a review. Pediatr Surg Int 24:129–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall J (1997) Short segment anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar scoliosis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 665–670

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1169–1181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenke LG, Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Reitenbach A, Blanke K, Bridwell KH (2001) Prospective dynamic functional evaluation of gait and spinal balance following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26:E330–E337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahaudens P, Banse X, Detrembleur C (2008) Effects of short-term brace wearing on the pendulum-like mechanism of walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 28:703–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C (2009) Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J 18:512–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahaudens P, Detrembleur C, Mousny M, Banse X (2009) Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: energy cost analysis. Eur Spine J 18:1160–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McArdle W, Katch F, Katch V (1996) Exercise physiology: energy, nutrition, and human performance. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murray MP, Kory RC, Clarkson BH (1969) Walking patterns in healthy old men. J Gerontol 24:169–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murray MP, Kory RC, Sepic SB (1970) Walking patterns of normal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 51:637–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roche AF, Eyman SL, Davila GH (1971) Skeletal age prediction. J Pediatr 78:997–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J (1978) Scoliosis: incidence and natural history. A prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:173–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Statham L, Murray MP (1971) Early walking patterns of normal children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 79:8–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van den Hecke A, Malghem C, Renders A, Detrembleur C, Palumbo S, Lejeune TM (2007) Mechanical work, energetic cost, and gait efficiency in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 27:643–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang T, Xu JG, Zeng BF (2008) Selective fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 121:1456–1461

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang T, Zeng B, Xu J, Chen H, Zhang T, Zhou W, Kong W, Fu Y (2008) Radiographic evaluation of selective anterior thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17:1012–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Fei Q, Qiu G, Lee CI, Shen J, Zhang J, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Wang H, Yuan S (2008) Anterior spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion for moderate lumbar/thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study. Spine 33:2166–2172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Waters RL, Barnes G, Husserl T, Silver L, Liss R (1988) Comparable energy expenditure after arthrodesis of the hip and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:1032–1037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Waters RL, Campbell J, Thomas L, Hugos L, Davis P (1982) Energy costs of walking in lower-extremity plaster casts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:896–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Waters RL, Mulroy S (1999) The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait. Gait Posture 9:207–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wong MS, Cheng CY, Ng BK, Lam TP, Sin SW, Lee-Shum LF, Chow HK, Tam YP (2008) The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the gait pattern of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait Posture 27:189–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Orthopedie Van Haesendonk firm.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Mahaudens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahaudens, P., Detrembleur, C., Mousny, M. et al. Gait in thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: effect of surgery on gait mechanisms. Eur Spine J 19, 1179–1188 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1292-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1292-2

Keywords

Navigation