Skip to main content
Log in

Direct repair of defects in lumbar spondylolysis with a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical, functional and Ct-assessed study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spondylolysis is a common entity, a minority of people affected by this disease need medical care, and only a few require surgery. Reconstruction of the pars interarticularis is an interesting alternative to segmental fusion; this technique has the advantage of preserving segmental motion. Most authors report good results for young patients without intervertebral disk or facet degenerative changes. Moreover Louis also showed good to excellent results with his technique carried out among people who presented a satisfactory disk height (equal to two thirds of normal height). This could extend the number of patients for whom pars interarticularis repair could be proposed. In this study, the limit of reconstruction was set at grade 3of the Pfirrmann’s classification. The fixation of the isthmus was done with a new kind of pedicle screw hook system. This stable and strong device is easy to use, allows an anatomic pars interarticularis reconstruction of spondylolysis and avoids a postoperative bracing. Twenty-three patients were assessed in this study, the mean age at operation was 34 (range 16–52 years) and the average follow-up was for 59 months (range 6–113 months). Eight patients showed moderate degenerative disk disease before the surgery and 12 patients had a grade 1 spondylolisthesis. The visual analogical scale, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the modified Prolo score were used for assessment of pain and clinical outcome before and after surgery. The results were from “excellent” to “good” for twenty patients (87%) and “fair” for three of them (13%). The consolidation of the isthmus was assessed at the end of the study (CT-scan); the fusion rate was observed in 91%. Among patients aged less than 30 years results are from “good”, to “excellent” in all cases and consolidation was always observed. All of them showed normal disc signal before the surgery. In the group aged more than 30 years, the results varied from “good” to “excellent’ in 73% and fusion of the defect was discovered in 82% of cases. Eight of them (73%) had moderate disk signal modification before the surgery. All people with fair results displayed moderate disk degeneration signs at MRI before surgery; but two of those three patients had a failure of defect consolidation too and it is also associated with poor results by several authors. No complication was found in this series. According to the good results reported by Louis and upto the current finding, the authors believe that pars interarticularis repair can be carried out on patients with moderate degenerative disk disease; the stage 3 of Pfirrmann’s classification seems a good limit. The Bone and joint research (B.J.R. system) is readily usable by any surgeon using pedicle screw systems and having a short learning curve. No device failure has been observed in this series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albassir A, Samson I, Hendrickx L (1990) Treatment of painful spondylolysis using Morscher’s hook. Acta Orthop Belg 56:489–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aota Y, Kumano K, Hirabashi S (1995) Postfusion instability at the adjacent segments alter rigid pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. J Spinal Disord 8:464–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelsson P, Johnson R, Ströngrist B (1997) The spondylolytic vertebra and its adjacent segment. Mobility measured before and after posterolateral fusion. Spine 22:414–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beckers L (1986) Buck’s operation for treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Belg 52:819–823

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnici AV, Koka SR, Richards DJ (1991) Results of Buck screw fusion in grade I spondylolisthesis. J R Soc Med 84:270–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buck J (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 52:432–437

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ et al (1998) Biomechanical comparison of spondylolysis fixation techniques. Spine 24:328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dreyzin V, Esses SI (1994) A comparative analysis of spondylolysis repair. Spine 19:1909–1915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Hao Y et al (1997) Anatomic considerations of the lumbar isthmus. Spine 22:941–945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank J, Davies J, Couper J, OBrien J (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8):271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillet P, Petit M (1999) Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine 24:1252–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hefti F, Seeling W, Morscher E (1992) Repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook-screw. Int Orthop 16:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hensinger RN (1989) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg 71:1084–1107

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herkowitz HN, Dvorak J, Bell G et al (2004) The lumbar spine. Non degenerative spondylolisthesis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 556–563

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet ii:884–886

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kakiuchi M (1997) Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg 79:818–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kimura M (1968) My method of filling the lesion with spongy bone in spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg (Jpn) 19:285–295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kip PH, Esses SI, Doherty B, Alexander J, Crawford M (1994) Biomechanical testing of pars defect repairs. Spine 23:2692–2697

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehman Tr, Sprat KF, Tozzi JE et al (1987) Long-term follow-up of lumbar fusion patients. Spine 12:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leong JCY, Grange WJ, Fang D (1983) Long term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Spine 8:793–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Louis R (1988) Pars interarticularis reconstruction of spondylolysis using plates and screws with grafting without arthrodesis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74(6):549–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Biyani A (1997) Screw placement in the lumbar vertebral isthmus. Clin Orthop 338:227–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mihara H, Onari K, Cheng BC et al (2003) The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Spine 28:235–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y et al (2000) Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25:1837–1842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Morscher E, Gerber B, Fasel J (1984) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Acta Orthop Trauma Surg 103:175–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nachemson A (1976) Repair of the spondylolisthesic defect and intertransverse fusion for young patients. Clin Orthop 117:101–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nicol R, Scott J (1986) Lytic spondylolysis, repair by wiring. Spine 11:1027–1030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ohmori K, Suzuki K, Ishida Y (1992) Translamino-pedicular screw fixation with bone grafting for symptomatic isthmic lumbar spondylolysis. Neurosurgery 30:379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pavlovcic V (1994) Surgical treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with a hook screw. Int Orthop 18:6–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pedersen A, Hagen R (1988) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: treatment by internal fixation and bone grafting of the defect. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:15–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pellise F, Toribio J, Rivas A et al (1999) Clinical and CT scan evaluation after direct repair in spondylolysis using segmental pedicle screw hook fixation. J Spinal Disord 12:363–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pfirrmann CWA, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of the lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roca, Jaime MD et al (2005) Direct repair of spondylolysis using a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical and CT-assessed study: an analysis of 19 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(suppl):S82–S89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roca J, Moretta D, Fuster S, Roca A (1989) Direct repair of spondylolysis. Clin Orthop 246:86–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sales de Gauzi J, Vadier F, Cahuzac JP (2000) Repair of lumbar spondylolysis using Morscher material. Acta Orthop Scand 71:292–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S et al (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine 12(3):276–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Scott JHS (1987) The Edinburgh repair of isthmic (Group II) spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg 69:491

    Google Scholar 

  39. Suh PB, Esses SI, Kostuik JP (1991) Repair of pars interarticularis defect. The prognostic value of infiltration. Spine 16(suppl):445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Taddonio RF (1991) Isthmic spondylolisthesis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RF (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 565–584

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H (1996) Repair of defects in spondylolysis by segmental pedicle screw hook fixation. Spine 21:2041–2045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Van der Werf G, Tonino A, Zeegers W (1985) Direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. Acta Orthop Scand 56:378–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weinhoffer L, Guyer RD, Herbert M et al (1995) Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 20:526–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wiltse LL, Widell EH Jr, Jackson DW (1975) Fatigue fracture the basic lesion is isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57(1):17–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Winter M, Jani L (1989) Results of screw osteosynthesis in spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang SW, Langrana NA, Lee CK (1980) Biomechanics of lombosacral spinal fusion in combined compression-torsion loads. Spine 11:937–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Debusscher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Debusscher, F., Troussel, S. Direct repair of defects in lumbar spondylolysis with a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical, functional and Ct-assessed study. Eur Spine J 16, 1650–1658 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0392-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0392-0

Keywords

Navigation