Skip to main content
Log in

MRI and 18FDG-PET in the assessment of bone marrow infiltration of the spine in cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI and 18FDG-PET in bone marrow infiltration of the spine due to metastases of solid tumours and lymphoma in cancer patients. In 35 cancer patients (solid tumours n = 26, lymphoma n = 9) MRI of the spine and 18FDG-PET were reviewed and the detectability of metastases, infiltration of the spine, extent of disease, and therapeutic implications were compared. In 8/35 cases (23%) imaging technique showed concordantly no bone marrow infiltration. In 19/35 patients (54%), both MRI and 18FDG-PET revealed bone marrow infiltration of the axial skeleton. In 12/19 patients (63%), MRI showed more extensive disease which lead to subsequent therapy. The imaging findings of MRI and 18FDG-PET were discordant in 8/35 cases (23%). 18FDG-PET was false positive in two patients. In six patients, 18FDG-PET failed to detect bone metastases and bone marrow infiltration of the spine, which was detected by MRI and proven by clinical follow-up with subsequent therapy in two cases. MRI is more sensitive and specific than 18FDG-PET detecting bone marrow metastases and infiltration of the spine and has a great impact in staging cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldstein N (1950) Metastases in carcinoma: analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer 3:336–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altehoefer C, Blum U, Bathmann J, Wüstenberg C, Uhrmeister P, Laubenberger J, Lange W, Schwarzkopf J, Moser E, Langer M (1997) Comparative accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and immunoscintigraphy for detection of bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 15:1754–1760

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Högerle S, Moser E, Langer M (2001) Comparative detectability of bone metastases and impact on therapy of magnetic resonance imaging and bone marrow scintigraphy in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Radiol 40:16–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baur A, Stäbler A, Nagel D et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging as a supplement for clinical staging system of Durie and Salmon ? Cancer 95:1334–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bares R (1998) Skeletal scintigraphy in breast cancer management. Q J Nucl Med 42:43–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brink I, Schumacher T, Mix M et al (2004) FDG-PET on the primary staging of small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:1614–1620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook GJ, Houston S, Rubens RD, Maisey MN, Fogelman I (1998) Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. J Clin Oncol 16:3375–3379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, Laukamp D, Sciuk J, Jurgens H, Schober O, Rummeny EJ (2001) Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG-PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fayad LM, Cohade C, Wahl RW, Fishman EK (2003) Sacral fractures: a potential pitfall of FDG-PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1239–1243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franzius C, Daldrup-Link HE, Wagner-Bohn A, Sciuk J, Heindel WL, Jürgens H, Schober O (2002) FDG-PET for detection of recurrences from malignant primary bone tumors and comparison with conventional imaging. Ann Oncol 13:157–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Franzius C, Sciuk J, Daldrup-Link HE, Jurgens H, Schober O (2000) FDG-PET for detection of osseous metastases from malignant primary bone tumours: comparison with bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med 27:1305–1311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Högerle S et al (2002) MRI and FDG-PET of the axial skeleton in cancer patients. ESSR 2002, IX Annual Meeting. pp 191–192

  13. Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Högerle S, Schäfer O, Winterer J, Moser E, Langer M (2002) Comparative diagnostic value and therapeutic relevance of magnetic resonance imaging and bone marrow scintigraphy in patients with metastastic solid tumors of the axial skeleton. Eur J Radiol 43:256–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kao CH, Hsieh JF, Tsai SC, Ho YJ, Yen RF (2000) Comparison and discrepancy of 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Tc-99m MDP bone scan to detect bone metastases. Anticancer Res 20:2189–2192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moog F, Kotzerke J, Reske SN (1999) FDG PET can replace bone scintigraphy in primary staging of malignant lymphoma. J Nucl Med 40:1407–1413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Munker R, Hasenclever D, Brosteanu O et al (1995) Bone marrow involvement in Hodgkin`s disease: an analysis of 135 consecutive cases. J Clin Oncol 13:403–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schirrmeister H, Guhlmann A, Kotzerke J et al (1999) Early detection and accurate description of extent of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer with fluoride ion and positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol 17:2381–2389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherry MM, Greco FA, Johnson DH, Hainsworth ID (1986) Breast cancer with skeletal metastases at initial diagnosis. Distinctive clinical characteristics and favourable prognosis. Cancer 58:178–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shreve PD, Barton GH, Gross MD, Wahl RL (1996) Metastatic prostate cancer: Initial findings of PET with 2-Deoxy-2-(F-18)fluoro-d1-glucose. Radiology 199:751–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wikenheiser KA, Silberstein EB (1996) Bone scintigraphy screening in stage I-II breast cancer: Is it cost-effective? Clevel Clin J Med 63:43–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadir Alexander Ghanem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghanem, N.A., Pache, G., Lohrmann, C. et al. MRI and 18FDG-PET in the assessment of bone marrow infiltration of the spine in cancer patients. Eur Spine J 16, 1907–1912 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0350-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0350-x

Keywords

Navigation