Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The value of neurophysiological and imaging studies in predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is not always easy to predict the degree of symptomatic improvement to be expected in a patient undergoing surgery for cervical disc herniation and radiculopathy. Here we investigate whether preoperative electromyography (EMG) can help select those most likely to benefit from intervention. We prospectively evaluated 20 patients whose required operative level was unclear after clinical examination and MRI scan alone. The surgical procedures was anterior cervical interbody fusion with the AcroMed® carbon fibre cage. Clinical assessment employed using validated scoring systems (Prolo functional and economic scoring system). Patients underwent MRI preoperatively, and were assessed pre and postoperatively with neurophysiological studies (NPS) including nerve conduction studies and concentric needle EMG. Patients with preoperative evidence of cervical nerve root involvement on EMG (group A, n = 8) had better outcome (P = 0.001) following discectomy and anterior fusion than patients who had no evidence of nerve root damage on EMG (group B, n = 12). Prolo mean score ± SEM for group A was 7.375 ± 0.3750 and for group B was 5.583 ±  0.2876. Thus, NPS are a valuable tool in selecting patients in this subgroup for cervical surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Refrences

  1. Ashkan K, Johnston P, Moore AJ (2002) A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and neurophysiological studies in the assessment of cervical radiculopathy. Br J Neurosurg 16(2):146–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A (1998) Self–administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):82–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertalanffy H, Eggert HR (1988) Clinical long term results of anterior discectomy without fusion for treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. A follow-up of 164 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 90(3–4):127–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO (1990) Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(8):1178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chesnut RM, Abitbol JJ, Garfin SR (1992) Surgical management of cervical radiculopathy. Indication, techniques and results. Orthop Clin North Am 23(3):461–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis RA (1996) A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy. Surg Neurol 46(6):523–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Donaldson JW, Nelson PB (2002) Anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion. Surg Neurol 57(4):219–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dumitru D (1995) In: Electrodiagnostic medicine, Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia, PA. 523–584

  9. Falck B, Nykvist F, Hurme M, Alaranta H (1993) prognostic value of EMG in patients with lumbar disc herniation—a five year follow up. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 33(1):19–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher MA (2002) Electrophysiology of radiculopathies. Clin Neurophysiol 113(3):317–335 (Review)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoover BB, Caldwell JW, Krusen EM, Muckeltos RN (1970) Value of polyphasic potentials in diagnosis of lumbar root lesions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 51(9):546–548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jho HD, Kim WK, Kim MH (2002) Anterior microforaminotomy for treatment of cervical radiculopathy: part 1—disc-preserving “functional cervical disc surgery”. Neurosurg 51(5):46–53

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khan MR, Mclnnes A, Hughes SP (1989) Electrophysiological studies in cervical spondylosis. J Spinal Disord 2(3):163–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Komori H, Okawa A, Haro H, Shinomiya Ki K (2002) Factors predicting the prognosis of lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation. J Orthop Sci 7(1):56–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knutsson B (1961) Comparative value of electromyographic, myelographic, and clinical-neurological examinations in the diagnosis of lumbar root compression syndromes. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 49:1–135

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levin KH, Maggiano HJ, Wilbourn AJ (1996) Cervical radiculopathies: comparison of surgical and EMG localization of single-root lesions. Neurol 46(4):1022–1025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Jannetta PJ, Sheptak PE, Zorub DS (1980) Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: treatment of lateral disc herniation in 253 cases. J Neurosurg 53(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagata K, Kiyonaga K, Ohashi T, Sagara M, Miyazaki S, Inoue A (1990) Clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging for cervical myelopathy. Spine 15(11):1088–1096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nardin RA, Patel MR, Gudas TF, Rutkove SB, Raynor EM (1999) Electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 22(2):151–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Negrin P, Lelli S, Fardin P (1991) contribution of electromyography to the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of cervical disc disease: a study of 114 patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 31(3):173–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M (1986) Toward uniform in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations: a paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 11(6):601–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sampath p, Bendebba M, Davis JD, Ducker TB (2000). Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy. A prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical. Spine 15:25(6):670–6 (Review)

  23. Savolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J (1998) A prospective randomized study of anterior single level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurg 43(1):51–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scoville WB, Dohrmann GJ, Corkill G (1976) Late results of cervical disc surgery. J Neurosurg 45(2):203–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shafaie FF, Wippold FJ 2nd, Gado M, Pilgram TK, Riew KD (1999) Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Spine 1 24(17):1781–1785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tachmann W, Radu EW (1983) Observation on the application of electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis of cervical root compressions. Eur Neurol 22:397–404

    Google Scholar 

  27. Toyokura M, Ishida A, Murakami K (1996) Follow- up study on F- Wave in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy. Comparison between before and after surgery. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36(4):207–214

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tullberg T, Svanborg E, Isacsson J, Grane P (1993) A preoperative and postoperative study of the accuracy and value of electrodiagnosis in patients with lumbosacral disc herniation. Spine 1 18(7):837–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wirth FP, Dowd GC, Sanders HF, Wirth C (2000) Cervical discectomy. A prospective analysis of three operative techniques. Surg Neurol 53(4):340–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Imperial College, London, UK

    Mogdad F. Alrawi, Piers Mitchell & Sean P. Hughes

  2. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK

    Mogdad F. Alrawi & Nofal M. Khalil

  3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Mogdad F. Alrawi

Authors
  1. Mogdad F. Alrawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nofal M. Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piers Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sean P. Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mogdad F. Alrawi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alrawi, M.F., Khalil, N.M., Mitchell, P. et al. The value of neurophysiological and imaging studies in predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J 16, 495–500 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0189-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0189-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation