Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical experience in cell-based therapeutics: intervention and outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disc herniation treated by discectomy results in a significant loss of nucleus material and disc height. Biological restoration through the use of autologous disc chondrocyte transplantation (ADCT) offers a potential to achieve functional integration of disc metabolism and mechanics. Nucleus regeneration using autologous cultured disc-derived chondrocytes has been demonstrated in a canine model and in clinical pilot studies. In 2002 a prospective, controlled, randomized, multicentre study comparing safety and efficacy of ADCT plus discectomy, with discectomy alone was initiated. The clinical goals were to provide long-term pain relief, maintain disc height, and prevent adjacent segment disease. Interim analysis was performed after 2 years; Oswestry (Low Back Pain/disability), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, as well as Prolo and VAS Score were used for the evaluation. Disc height was assessed by MRI. A clinically significant reduction of low back pain in the ADCT-treated group was shown by all three pain score systems. The median total Oswestry Score was 2 in the ADCT group compared with 6 in the control group. Decreases in the Disability index in ADCT-treated patients correlated with the reduction of low back pain. Decreases in disc height over time were only found in the control group, and of potential significance, intervertebral discs in adjacent segments appeared to retain hydration when compared to those adjacent to levels that had undergone discectomy without cell intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson DG, Albert TJ, Fraser JK, Risbud M, Wuisman P, Meisel HJ, Tannoury C, Shapiro I, Vaccaro AR (2005) Cellular therapy for disc degeneration. Spine 30(Suppl. 1):S14–S19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, et al (1996) The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, aging, and degeneration. J Clin Invest 98:996–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bibby SRS, Jones DA, Lee RB, Yu J, Urban JPG (2001) The pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc. Joint Bone Spine 68:537–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Erwin WM, Inman RD (2006) Notochordal cells regulate intervertebral disc chondrocyte proteoglycan production and cell proliferation. Spine 31(10):1094–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans C (2006) Potential biologic therapies for the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88A(Suppl. 2):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganey TM, Meisel HJ (2002) A potential role for cell-based therapeutics in the treatment of intervertebral disc herniation. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S206–S214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganey TM, Libera J, Moos V, Alasevic O, Fritsch KG, Meisel HJ, Hutton WC (2003) Disc chondrocyte transplantation in a canine model: a treatment for degenerated or damaged intervertebral disc. Spine 28:2609–2620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber HE, Hanley EN Jr (1998) Analysis of aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc: comparison of surgical specimens with normal controls. Spine 23:751–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber HE, Johnson TL, Leslie K, Ingram JA, Martin D, et al (2002) Autologous intervertebral disc cell implantation. Spine 27:1626–1633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutton WC, Murakami H, Li J, Elmer WA, Yoon ST, Minamide A, Akamaru T, Tomita K (2004) The effect of blocking a nutritional pathway to the intervertebral disc in the dog model. J Spinal Disord Tech 17(1):53–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson WE, Sivan S, Wright KT, Eisenstein SM, Stephen M, Maroudas A, Roberts S (2006) Human intervertebral disc cells promote nerve growth over substrata of human intervertebral disc aggrecan. Spine 31(11):1187–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson JW III, Levicoff EA, Gilbertson LG, Kang JD (2006) Biological modification of animal models of intervertebral disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88A(Suppl. 2):83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipson SJ, Muir H (1981) 1980 Volvo Award in basic science. Proteoglycans in experimental intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 6:194–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maroudas A, Stockwell RA, Nachemson A, et al (1975) Factors involved in the nutrition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc: cellularity and diffusion of glucose in vitro. J Anat 120:113–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mizuno S (2005) A novel method for assessing effects of hydrostatic fluid pressure on intracellular calcium: a study with bovine articular chondrocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288(2):C329–C337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nerlich AG, Schleicher ED, Boos N (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in basic science studies. Immunohistologic markers for age-related changes of human lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 22(24):2781–2795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Okuma M, Mochida J, Nishimura K, Sakabe K, Seiki K (2000) Reinsertion of stimulated nucleus pulposus cells retards intervertebral disc degeneration: an in vitro and in vivo experimental study. J Orthop Res 18:988–997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips FM, An H, Kang JD, Boden SD, Weinstein J (2003) Biologic treatment for intervertebral disc degeneration: summary statement. Spine 28(Suppl. 15):S99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sobajima S, Kim JS, Gilbertson LG, Kang JD (2004) Gene therapy for degenerative disc disease. Gene Ther 11:390–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stookey JD (2005) High prevalence of plasma hypertonicity among community-dwelling older adults: results from NHANES III. J Am Diet Assoc 105(8):1231–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun Y, Hurtig M, Pilliar RM, Grynpas M, Kandel RA (2001) Characterization of nucleus pulposus-like tissue formed in vitro. J Orthop Res 19:1078–1084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IKY, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15:411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Urban JP, Holm S, Maroudas A, Nachemson A (1977) Nutrition of the intervertebral disk. An in vivo study of solute transport. Clin Orthop 129:101–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Urban JPG, Holm S, Maroudas A, Nachemson A (1982) The nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Effect of fluid flow on solute transport. Clin Orthop 170:296–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial and clinical support for this study was underwritten by co.don AG, Teltow, Germany. Additional collaboration was supported by Bergmannstrost, the Atlanta Medical Center, and the Emory Spine Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Ganey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meisel, H.J., Ganey, T., Hutton, W.C. et al. Clinical experience in cell-based therapeutics: intervention and outcome. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 3), 397–405 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0169-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0169-x

Keywords

Navigation