Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

IDET: a critical appraisal of the evidence

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smith and Nephew (Endoscopy division, Andover, MA, USA) have estimated that 60,000 Intra-Discal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET) procedures have been performed world wide up to June 2005. Despite the large number of procedures performed, a critical appraisal of the evidence of efficacy of IDET has not appeared in the literature. This paper reviews the current evidence of clinical efficacy for IDET obtained via a systematic review of the literature. Studies were included if they used at least one of four specified primary outcome measures; pain intensity as assessed by a visual analogue score (VAS), global measurement of overall improvement, back specific functional status such as Oswestry disability Index (ODI) and return to work. Levels of evidence were assigned according to the hierarchy described by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (www.cebm.net). Papers addressing possible mechanisms of action of IDET were not considered as the focus of the literature review was clinical effectiveness. Eleven prospective cohort studies (level II evidence) were reported on a total of 256 patients with a mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range 12–28 months). The mean improvement in the VAS for back pain was 3.4 points (range 1.4–6.5) and the mean improvement in ODI was 5.2 points (range 4.0–6.4). A total of 379 patients were reported in five retrospective studies (level III evidence). Between 13 and 23% of patients subsequently underwent surgery for low back pain within the study period. Two randomised controlled trials of IDET have been reported in the literature. The first randomised 64 patients (37 to IDET, 27 to Sham). The advantage for IDET patients amounted to 1.3 points on the VAS and seven points on the ODI. The second study randomised 57 subjects (38 to IDET, 19 to Sham) and showed no benefit from IDET over placebo. The evidence for efficacy of IDET remains weak and has not passed the standard of scientific proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman III WE (2002) Cauda equina syndrome after intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Reg Anaesth Pain Med 27:622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barendse GAM, Van den berg SGM, Kessels AHF et al (2001) Randomised controlled trial of percutaneous intradiscal radio-frequency thermo-coagulation for chronic discogenic back pain. Lack of effect from a 90-second 70°C lesion. Spine 26:287–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bogduk N, Karasek M (2002) Two-year follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal anuloplasty for chronic low back pain resulting from internal disc disruption. Spine J 2:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carey TS (2005) Point of view. Spine 30:2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Abdi S (2003) Risk factors for failure and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy: a pilot study. Spine 28:1142–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Polly DW Jr (2002) A giant herniated disc following intradiscal electrothermal therapy. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:537–541

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis TT, Delamarter RB, Sra P et al (2004) The IDET procedure for chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 29:752–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Derby R, Eek B, Chen Y et al (2000) Intradiscal electrothermal annuloplasty (IDET): a novel approach for treating chronic discogenic back pain. Neuromodulation 3:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Dimar JR et al (2002) Vertebral osteonecrosis associated with the use of intradiscal electrothermal therapy. A case report. Spine 27:E325–E328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckel TS, Ortiz AO (2002) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy in the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedman BA, Cohen SP, Kuklo TR et al (2003) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for chronic low back pain in active-duty soldiers: 2-year follow-up. Spine J 3:502–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman BJC, Fraser RD, Cain CMJ et al (2005) A randomised double-blind controlled trial: intra-discal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine 30:2369–2377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerszten PC, Welch WC, McGrath PM et al (2002) A prospective outcomes study of patients undergoing intradiscal electrothermy (IDET) for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 5:360–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsia AW, Isaac K, Katz JS (2000) Cauda equina syndrome from intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Neurology 55:320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapural L, Hayek S, Malak O et al (2005) Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of discogenic pain: a prospective matched control trial. Pain Med 6:425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karasek M, Bogduk N (2000) Twelve-month follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disruption. Spine 25:2601–2607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee MS, Cooper G, Lutz GE et al (2003) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for treatment of chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimum 2-year clinical outcome study. Pain Physician 6:443–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutz C, Lutz GE, Cooke PM (2003) Treatment of chronic lumbar diskogenic pain with intradiskal electrothermal therapy: a prospective outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orr RD, Thomas S (2005) Intradural migration of broken IDET catheter causing a radiculopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:185–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SY, Mood SH, Park MS et al (2005) Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic lower back pain patients with internal disc disruption. Yonsei Med J 46:539–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P et al (2004) A randomised, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J 4:27–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Philips B, Ball C, Sackett D et al (2001) The oxford centre for evidence-based levels of evidence. www.cebm.net

  23. Saal JA, Saal JS (1999) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) training course syllabus. Oratec Interventions Inc., Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saal JS, Saal JA (2000a) Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with a thermal intradiscal catheter: a preliminary report. Spine 25:382–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saal JA, Saal JS (2000b) Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain. A prospective outcome study with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Spine 25:2622–2627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Saal JA, Saal JS (2002) Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain. A prospective outcome study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 27:966–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scholl BM, Theiss SM, Lopez-Ben R, et al (2003) Vertebral osteonecrosis related to intradiscal electrothermal therapy: a case report. Spine 28:E161–E164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith and Nephew Sustainability report published 28th April 2003 (www.smith-nephew.com)

  29. Spruit M, Jacobs WCH (2002) Pain and function after intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) for symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 11:589–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Webster BS, Verma S, Pransky GS (2004) Outcomes of workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain undergoing intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Spine 29:435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wetzel FT (2001) Cauda equina syndrome from intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Neurology 56:1607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK

    Brian J. C. Freeman

Authors
  1. Brian J. C. Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. C. Freeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeman, B.J.C. IDET: a critical appraisal of the evidence. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 3), 448–457 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0156-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0156-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation