Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intervertebral disc structures are exposed to wide ranges of intradiscal hydrostatic pressure during different loading excercises and are at their minimum during lying or relaxed sitting and at maximum during lifting weights with a round back. We hypothesize that these different loading magnitudes influence the intervertebral disc (IVD) by alteration of disc matrix turnover depending on their magnitudes. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess changes in gene expression of human nucleus cells after the application of low hydrostatic pressure (0.25 MPa) and high hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa). IVD cells isolated from the nucleus of human (n = 18) and bovine (n = 24 from four animals) disc biopsies were seeded into three-dimensional collagen type-I matrices and exposed to the different loading magnitudes by specially developed pressure chambers. The lower pressure range (0.25 MPa, 30 min, 0.1 Hz) was applied with a recently published device by using an external compression cylinder. For the application of higher loads (2.5 MPa, 30 min, 0.1 Hz) the cell-loaded collagen gels were sealed into sterile bags with culture medium and stimulated in a newly developed water-filled compression cylinder by using a loading frame. These methods allowed the comparison of loading regimes in a wide physiological range under an equal three-dimensional culture conditions. Cells were harvested 24 h after the end of stimulation and changes in the expression of genes known to influence IVD matrix turnover (collagen-I, collagen-II, aggrecan, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP13) were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test1 and a Wilcoxon 2-sample test2 were performed to detect differences between the stimulated and control samples1 and differences between low and high hydrostatic pressure2. Multiple testing was considered by adjusting the p value appropriately. Both regimes of hydrostatic pressure influenced gene expression in nucleus cells with opposite tendencies for the matrix forming proteins aggrecan and collagen type-I in response to the two different pressure magnitudes: Low hydrostatic-pressure (0.25 MPa) tended to increase collagen-I and aggrecan expression of human nucleus cells (P < 0.05) but only to a small degree. High hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa) tended to decrease gene expression of all anabolic proteins with significant effects on aggrecan expression of nucleus cells (P = 0.004). Low hydrostatic pressure had no influence on the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP13). In contrast, high hydrostatic pressure tended to increase the expression of MMP1, MMP3 and MMP13 of human nucleus cells with high individual-individual variations. The decreased expression of aggrecan (P = 0.008) and collagen type II (P = 0.023) and the increased MMP3 expression (P = 0.008) in response to high hydrostatic pressure could be confirmed in additional experiments with bovine nucleus cells. These results suggest that hydrostatic pressure as one of the physiological stimuli of the IVD may influence matrix turnover in a magnitude dependent way. Low hydrostatic pressure (0.25 MPa) has quite small influences with a tendency to anabolic effects, whereas high hydrostatic pressure (2.5 MPa) tends to decrease the matrix protein expression with a tendency to increase some matrix-turnover enzymes. Therefore, hydrostatic pressure may regulate disc matrix turnover in a dose-dependent way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(6):965–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bibby SR, Urban JP (2004) Effect of nutrient deprivation on the viability of intervertebral disc cells. Eur Spine J 13 (8):695–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brand RA, Stanford CM, Nicolella DP (2001) Primary adult human bone cells do not respond to tissue (continuum) level strains. J Orthop Sci 6(3):295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckwalter JA (1995) Aging and degeneration of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 20(11):1307–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehrenbacher A, Steck E, Rickert M, Roth W, Richter W (2003) Rapid regulation of collagen but not metalloproteinase 1, 3, 13, 14 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, 2, 3 expression in response to mechanical loading of cartilage explants in vitro. Arch Biochem Biophys 410(1):39–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 4. Mechanical influences on intact fibrous tissues. Anat Rec 226(4):433–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall AC (1999) Differential effects of hydrostatic pressure on caution transport pathways of isolated articular chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol 178(2):197–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Handa T, Ishihara H, Ohshima H, Osada R, Tsuji H, Obata K (1997) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis and matrix metalloproteinase production in the human lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 22(10):1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishihara H, McNally DS, Urban JP, Hall AC (1996) Effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in different regions of the intervertebral disk. J Appl Physiol 80(3):839–846

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kasra M, Goel V, Martin J, Wang ST, Choi W, Buckwalter J (2003) Effect of dynamic hydrostatic pressure on rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J Orthop Res 21(4):597–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maclean JJ, Lee CR, Alini M, Iatridis JC (2004) Anabolic and catabolic mRNA levels of the intervertebral disc vary with the magnitude and frequency of in vivo dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 22(6):1193–1200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wurtz K, Liedert A et al (2005) A three-dimensional collagen matrix as a suitable culture system for the comparison of cyclic strain and hydrostatic pressure effects on intervertebral disc cells. J Neurosurg Spine 2(4):457–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Setton LA, Chen J (2004) Cell mechanics and mechanobiology in the intervertebral disc. Spine 29(23):2710–2723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shirazi-Adl A, Ahmed AM, Shrivastava SC (1986) A finite element study of a lumbar motion segment subjected to pure sagittal plane moments. J Biomech 19(4):331–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stanford CM, Morcuende JA, Brand RA (1995) Proliferative and phenotypic responses of bone-like cells to mechanical deformation. J Orthop Res 13(5):664–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stokes IA, Iatridis JC (2004) Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine 29(23):2724–2732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Urban JP, Roberts S (2003) Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther 5(3):120–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Videman T, Leppavuori J, Kaprio J et al (1998) Intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor gene associated with intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 23(23):2477–2485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Videman T, Gibbons LE, Battie MC et al (2001) The relative roles of intragenic polymorphisms of the vitamin d receptor gene in lumbar spine degeneration and bone density. Spine 26(3):E7–E12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Mrs. Daniela Wasiak for excellent technical assistance and Mr. Herbert Schmitt for expert construction of the stimulation apparatus. Special thanks goes to Ars Arthro AG (Esslingen, Germany) for providing the collagen gel. This work was supported by the European Union research project EURODISC QLK6-CT-2002-02582.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neidlinger-Wilke, C., Würtz, K., Urban, J.P.G. et al. Regulation of gene expression in intervertebral disc cells by low and high hydrostatic pressure. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 3), 372–378 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0112-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0112-1

Keywords

Navigation