Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classification presented in this paper is the first specifically designed to guide surgical treatment of L5–S1 spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. It also presents objective criteria to differentiate between low- and high-dysplastic spondylolisthesis and incorporates recent knowledge in the study of sagittal spinopelvic balance. The proposed classification is based on the following: (1) the degree of slip, (2) the degree of dysplasia, and (3) the sagittal spinopelvic balance. To classify a patient, the degree of slip is quantified first to determine if it is low-grade, high-grade, or a spondyloptosis. Then, the degree of dysplasia is evaluated based on seven criteria, in order to separate patients with low- and high-dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Finally, the sagittal spinopelvic balance is assessed from the measurement of the pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT). For low-grade spondylolisthesis, it is classified as low PI/low SS (nutcracker type) or high PI/high SS (shear type). For high-grade spondylolisthesis, it is classified as high SS/low PT (balanced pelvis) or low SS/high PT (retroverted pelvis). Such a comprehensive classification could allow to better evaluate and compare available surgical techniques, and to optimize the treatment of L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Because the classification was designed so that groups are organized in an ascending order of severity, it becomes easier and more intuitive to develop an associated surgical algorithm because the complexity of the surgery should increase as the severity of the spondylolisthesis increases. A tentative treatment algorithm is proposed but it is not definitive because further studies are required to define the most appropriate treatment for each group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Khawashki H, Al-Sebai W (2001) Combined dysplastic and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Possible etiology. Spine 26:E542–E546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amundson G, Edwards CC, Garfin SR (1992) Spondylolisthesis. In: Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Balderston RA et al (eds) The spine, 3rd edn. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 913–969

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ani N, Keppler L, Biscup RS et al (1991) Reduction of high-grade slips (grade III-V) with VSP instrumentation. Report of a series of 41 cases. Spine 16(Suppl 6):S302–S310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Askar Z, Wardlaw D, Koti M (2003) Scott wiring for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. Spine 28:354–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker D, McHollick W (1956) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 38:933–934

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berthonnaud É, Dimnet J, Roussouly P et al (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord 18:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburne JS, Velikas EP (1977) Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59:490–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohlman HH, Cook SS (1982) One-stage decompression and posterolateral and interbody fusion for lumbosacral spondyloptosis through a posterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:415–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boos N, Marchesi D, Aebi M (1991) Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 4:472–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boos N, Marchesi D, Zuber K et al (1993) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by reduction and pedicular fixation. A 4–6 years follow-up study. Spine 18:1655–1661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB et al (1979) Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:479–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bradford DS (1979) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Curr Pract Orthop Surg 8:12–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bradford DS (1983) Management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Instruct Course Lect 32:151–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradford DS, Iza J (1985) Repair of the defect in spondylolysis or minimal degrees of spondylolisthesis by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Spine 10:673–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O (1990) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by anterior and posterior reduction and stabilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1060–1066

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:432–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cunningham BW, Lewis SJ, Long J et al (2002) Biomechanical evaluation of lumbosacral reconstruction techniques for spondylolisthesis. An in vitro porcine model. Spine 27:2321–2327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Curylo LJ, Edwards C, DeWald RW (2002) Radiographic markers in spondyloptosis. Implications for spondylolisthesis progression. Spine 27:2021–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dubousset J (1997) Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop 337:77–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W et al (1985) Towards standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 10:83–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Duval-Beaupère G, Schmidt C, Cosson P (1992) A barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng 20:451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edwards CC (2003) High-grade spondylolisthesis: gradual instrumentation reduction. Presented at the Scoliosis Research Society CME Course, September 10

  23. Fabris DA, Costantini S, Nena U (1996) Surgical treatment of severe L5–S1 spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: results of intraoperative reduction, posterior interbody fusion, and segmental pedicle fixation. Spine 21:728–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Faro FD, Marks MC, Pawelek J et al (2004) Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:2284–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferguson RJ, McMaster JH, Stanitski CL (1975) Low back pain in college football linemen. J Sports Med 2:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ et al (1984) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:699–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frennered AK, Danielson BI, Nachemson AL (1991) Natural history of symptomatic isthmic low-grade spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: a seven-year follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop 11:209–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaines RW, Nichols WK (1985) Treatment of spondyloptosis by two stage L5 vertebrectomy and reduction of L4 onto S1. Spine 10:680–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaines RW (2005) L5 vertebrectomy for the surgical treatment of spondyloptosis. Thirty cases in 25 years. Spine 30:S66–S70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gillet P, Petit M (1999) Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw constructand bone grafting of the pars defect. Spine 24:1252–1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Grzegorzewski A, Kumar SJ (2000) In situ posterolateral spine arthrodesis for grades III, IV, and V spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 20:506–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hammerberg KW (2005) New concepts on the pathogenesis and classification of spondylolisthesis. Spine 30:S4–S11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanson DS, Bridwell KH, Rhee JM et al (2002) Correlation of pelvic incidence with low- and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:2026–2029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Harms J (1997) True spondylolisthesis reduction and monosegmental fusion in spondylolisthesis. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1337–1347

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harris IE, Weinstein SL (1987) Long-term follow-up of patients with grade-III and IV spondylolisthesis. Treatment with and without posterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:960–969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Helenius I, Lamberg T, Österman K et al (2005) Scoliosis Research Society outcome Instrument in evaluation of long-term surgical results in spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis in young patients. Spine 30:336–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Herman MJ, Pizzutillo PD, Cavalier R (2003) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the child and adolescent athlete. Orthop Clin North Am 34:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Herman MJ, Pizzutillo PD (2005) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the child and adolescent. A new classification. Clin Orthop 434:46–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH et al (2005) Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36’’ radiograph? Spine 30:427–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hresko MT, Labelle H, Roussouly P et al (2005) High grade spondylolisthesis: correlations between pelvic version and spine balance. Presented at the 2005 Meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Ottawa, Canada, May 13–15

  41. Hu SS, Bradford DS (2001) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine principles and practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 433–451

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ikata T, Miyake R, Katoh S et al (1996) Pathogenesis of sports-related spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Radiographic and magnetic imaging study. Am J Sports Med 24:94–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson DW, Wiltse LL, Cirincoine RJ (1976) Spondylolysis in the female gymnast. Clin Orthop 117:68–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C et al (2003) Pelvic lordosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine 28:151–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Johnson GV, Thompson AG (1992) The Scott wiring technique for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:426–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Johnson JR, Kirwan EO (1983) The long-term results of fusion in situ for severe spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:43–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kakiuchi M (1997) Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. Durable fixation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:818–825

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuklo TR, Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ et al (2001) Minimum 2-year analysis of sacropelvic fixation and L5–S1 fusion using S1 and iliac screws. Spine 26:1976–1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud É et al (2004) Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance. A correlation study. Spine 29:2049–2954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud É et al (2005) The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5–S1 developmental spondylolisthesis. A review of pertinent radiological measurements. Spine 30:S27–S34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Labelle H, Hresko T, Roussouly P et al (2006) Low-grade Spondylolisthesis: how pelvic tilt and sacral slope interact with spino-pelvic balance. Presented at the sixth annual meeting of the Canadian spine society, Lake Louise, Canada, March 22–25

  52. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D et al (2003) The importance of spino-pelvic balance after spinal instrumentation for high grade developmental spondylolisthesis. Presented at the scoliosis research society 38th annual meeting, Quebec, Canada, September 11–13

  53. Lehmer SM, Steffee AD, Gaines RW Jr (1994) Treatment of L5–S1 spondyloptosis by staged L5 resection with reduction and fusion of L4 into S1 (Gaines procedure). Spine 19:1916–1925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D et al (1992) Results of in-situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 5:433–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Letts M, Smallman T, Afanasiev R et al (1986) Fracture of the pars interarticularis in adolescent athletes: a clinical biomechanical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 6:40–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lindholm TS, Ragni P, Ylikoski M et al (1990) Lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Radiologic evaluation and results of operative treatment. Spine 15:1350–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mac-Thiong J-M, Berthonnaud É, Dimar II JR et al (2004) Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine 29:1642–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H, Berthonnaud É et al (2005) Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J Nov 26:1–8 (Epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Marchetti PC, Bartolozzi P (1997) Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guideline for treatment. In: Bridwell KH, DeWald RL, Hammerberg KW et al (eds) The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1211–1254

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mardjetko S, Albert T, Andersson G et al (2005) Spine/SRS spondylolisthesis summary statement. Spine 30:3S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Marty C, Boisaubert B, Descamps H et al (2002) The sagittal anatomy of the sacrum among young adults, infants, and spondylolisthesis patients. Eur Spine J 11:119–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. McCarroll JR, Miller JM, Ritter MA (1986) Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in college football players. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 14:404–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Meyerding HW (1932) Spondylisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mihara H, Onari K, Cheng BC (2003) The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Spine 28:235–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 24:1701–1711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2002) Anterior column support in surgery for high-grade, isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 394:109–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Möller H, Hedlund R (2000) Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis. A prospective randomized study part 2. Spine 25:1716–1721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Muschik M, Zippel H, Perka C (1997) Surgical management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: anterior fusion in situ versus anterior spondylodesis with posterior transpedicular instrumentation and reduction. Spine 22:2036–2043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Miyake R, Ikata T, Katoh S et al (1996) Morphologic analysis of the facet joint in the immature lumbosacral spine with special reference to spondylolysis. Spine 21:783–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Newton PO, Johnston II CE (1997) Analysis and treatment of poor outcomes following in situ arthrodesis in adolescent spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop 17:754–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. O’Brien MF (2003) Low-grade isthmic/lytic spondylolisthesis in adults. Instruct Course Lect 52:511–524

    Google Scholar 

  72. O’Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM et al (2004) Spinal Deformity Study Group. Radiographic measurement manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek

  73. Pedersen AK, Hagen R (1988) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Treatment by internal fixation and bone-grafting of the defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:15–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG et al (1996) An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine 21:1133–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S et al (1993) Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Reduction or fusion in situ. Spine 18:894–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W et al (2002) The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 15:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  77. Roca J, Iborra M, Cavanilles-Walker JM et al (2005) Direct repair of spondylolysis using a new pedicle screw hook fixation. J Spinal Disord 18(Suppl 1):S82–S89

    Google Scholar 

  78. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud É et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5–S1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine (in press)

  79. Sairyo K, Katoh S, Ikata T et al (2001) Development of spondylolytic olisthesis in adolescents. Spine J 1:171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Poussa M et al (1988) Spondylolisthesis in children under 12 years of age: long-term results of 56 patients treated conservatvely or operatively. J Pediatr Orthop 8:516–521

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Hyvarinen H et al (1991) Progression of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. A long-term follow-up of 272 patients. Spine 16:417–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Shufflebarger HL, Geck MJ (2005) High-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Monosegmental surgical treatment. Spine 30:S42–S48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Smith MD, Bohlman HH (1990) Spondylolisthesis treated by a single stage operation combining decompression with in situ posterolateral and anterior fusion. An analysis of eleven patients who had long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:415–421

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Standaert CJ (2002) Spondylolysis in the adolescent athlete. Clin J Sport Med 12:119–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Stanton RP, Meehan P, Lovell WW (1985) Surgical fusion in childhood spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop 5:411–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Sys J, Michielsen J, Bracke P et al (2001) Nonoperative treatment of active spondylolysis in elite athletes with normal X-ray findings: literature review and results of conservative treatment. Eur Spine J 10:498–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Tonino A, van der Werf G (1994) Direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis: 10-year follow-up of 12 previously reported cases. Acta Orthop Scand 65:91–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Velikas EP, Blackburne JS (1981) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:67–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Whitesides Jr TE, Horton WC, Hutton WC et al (2005) Spondylotic spondylolisthesis. A study of pelvic and lumbosacral parameters of possible etiologic effect in two genetically and geographically distinct groups with high occurrence. Spine 30:S12–S21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I (1976) Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 117:23–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wu SS, Lee CH, Chen PQ (1999) Operative repair of symptomatic spondylolysis following a positive response to diagnostic pars injection. J Spinal Disord 12:10–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Yue W-M, Brodner W, Gaines RW (2005) Anatomical spinal anatomy in 27 cases of surgically corrected spondyloptosis. Proximal sacral endplate damage as a possible cause of spondyloptosis. Spine 30:S22–S26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was assisted by support from the Spinal Deformity Study Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Orthopaedics, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong & Hubert Labelle

  2. Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong & Hubert Labelle

Authors
  1. Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hubert Labelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mac-Thiong, JM., Labelle, H. A proposal for a surgical classification of pediatric lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on current literature. Eur Spine J 15, 1425–1435 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0101-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0101-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation