Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the effect of physical workload on the occurrence of low back pain (LBP) has been extensively investigated, few quantitative studies have examined the morphological changes visualized via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in relation to occupational variables. The relationship between the severity of some abnormalities such as lumbar spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis and physical or psychosocial occupational risk factors has not been investigated previously. In this cross-sectional study patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) long-standing (minimum 1-year) LBP radiating down the leg (or not); (2) age more than 40 years; (3) willingness to undergo an MRI of the lumbar spine; and (4) ability to speak Italian. Primary objective of the study was to investigate the association between occupational exposure and morphological MRI findings, while controlling for the individual risk factors for LBP. Secondarily, we looked at the influence of this exposure and the degenerative changes in the lumbar spine on clinical symptoms and the related disability. Lumbar MRI scans from 120 symptomatic patients were supplemented by the results of structured interviews, which provided personal, medical, and occupational histories. All occupational factors were arranged on scales of increasing exposure, whereas pain and disability were assessed using ad hoc validated questionnaires. Evidence of intervertebral disc narrowing or herniation and the occurrence and severity of spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis was obtained from the MRI scans and a summative degenerative score was then calculated. We detected a direct association between increasing age and the global amount of degenerative change, the severity of intervertebral disc height loss, the number of narrowed discs, stenosis, the number of stenotic levels, and spondylolisthesis. Physical occupational exposure was not associated with the presence of lumbar disc degeneration and narrowing per se, but a higher degree of such an exposure was directly associated with a higher degree of degeneration (P=0.017). Spondylolistesis and stenosis were positively related to heavy workload (P=0.014) and the manual handling of materials (P=0.023), respectively. Psychosocial occupational discomfort was directly associated to stenosis (P=0.041) and number of stenotic levels (P=0.019). A heavier job workload was the only occupational factor positively related to the degree of disability at the multivariate analysis (P=0.002). Total amount of degeneration in the lumbar spine directly influenced pain duration (P=0.011) and degree of disability (P=0.050). These results suggest that caution should be exercised when symptomatic subjects with evidence of degenerative changes on MRI scans engage in strenuous physical labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amundsen T, Weber H, Lilleas F, Nordal HJ, Abdelnoor M, Magnaes B (1995) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiological features. Spine 20:1178–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Battiè MC, Videman T, Gibbson LE, Fisher LD, Manninen H, Gill K (1995) Determinants of lumbar disc degeneration: a study relating lifetime exposure and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine 20:2601–2612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Battié MC, Videman T, Gibbons LE, Manninen H, Gill K, Pope M, Kapiro J (2002) Occupational driving and lumbar disc degeneration: a case control study. Lancet 360:1369–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard BP, Fine LJ (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. US Department of Health and Human Services. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biering-Sorensen F, Thomsen CE, Hilden J (1989) Risk indicators for low back trouble. Scand J Rehab Med 21:151–157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bono CM (2004) Low-back pain in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:382–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Moe JH (1979) Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:479–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burdorf A, Naaktgeboren B, de Groot H (1993) Occupational risk factors for low back pain among sedentary workers. J Occup Med 35:1213–1220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burdorf A, Sorock G (1997) Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 23:243–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Symonds TL, Burke C, Mathewson T (1996) Occupational risk factors for the first-onset and subsequent course of low back trouble. A study of serving police officers. Spine 21:2612–2620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawson EG, Kanim LE, Sra P, Dorey FJ, Goldstein TB, Delamarter RB, Sandhu HS (2002) Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: outcomes analysis. Spine 27:984–993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ (1987) Functional disability due to back pain. A population-based study indicating the importance of socioeconomic factors. Arthritis Rheum 30:1247–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2002) Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 27:125–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. European Agency for Safety, Health at Work (2000) Research on work related low back disorders. Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fransen M, Woodward M, Norton R, Coggan C, Dawe M, Sheridan N (2002) Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain. Spine 27:92–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grotle M, Brox JI, Veierod MB, Glomsrod B, Lonn JH, Vollestad NK (2005) Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time. Spine 30:976–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A, the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group (2002) Characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain selected for surgery: a comparison with the general population reported from the Swedish lumbar spine study. Spine 27:1223–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heliovaara M (1987) Body height, obesity, and risk of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Spine 5:469–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heliovaara M (1987) Occupation and risk of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization. J Chronic Dis 40:259–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Herno A, Partanen K, Talaslahti T (1999) Long term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after laminectomy. Spine 24:1533–1537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Holmstrom EB, Lindell J, Moritz U (1992) Low back and neck/shoulder pain in construction workers occupational workload and psychosocial risk factors Part 1 relationship to low back pain. Spine 17:663–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MNM, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM (2000) Systematic review of psychococial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine 25:2114–2125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HC, Douwes M, Koes BW, Miedema MC, Ariens GA, Bouter LM (2000) Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 25:3087–3092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 331:69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jensen MP, Turner LR, Turner JA, Romano JM (1996) The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 67:35–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Johanning E (2000) Evaluation and management of occupational low back disorders. Am J Ind Med 37:94–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karacan I, Aydin T, Sahin Z, Cidem M, Koyuncu H, Aktas I, Uludag M (2004) Facet angles in lumbar disc herniation: their relation to anthropometric features. Spine 29:1132–1136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kelsey JL, Hardy RJ (1975) Driving of motor vehicles as a risk factor for acute herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Am J Epidemiol 102:63–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Latza U, Kohlmann T, Deck R, Raspe H (2000) Influence of occupational factors on the relation between socioeconomic status and self-reported back pain in a population-based sample of German adults with back pain. Spine 25:1390–1397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Lamminen A, Viikari-Juntura E (1998) Lumbar disc degeneration in relation to occupation. Scand J Work Environ Health 24:358–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A (2000) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 25:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Magora A (1973) Investigation of the relation between low back pain and occupation. IV. Physical requirements bending, rotation, reaching and sudden maximal effort. Scand J Rehabil Med 5:186–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE, Fathallah FA (1995) Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. Ergonomics 38:377–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Matsui H, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Yudoh K, Naruse Y, Tsuji H (1998) Familial predisposition for lumbar degenerative disc disease.A case control study. Spine 23:1029–1034

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nachemson AL, Andersson GB (1982) Classification of low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 8:134–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Oleske DM, Neelakantan J, Andersson GB, Hinrichs BG, Lavender SA, Morrissey MJ, Zold-Kilbourn P, Taylor E (2004) Factors affecting recovery from work-related, low back disorders in autoworkers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1362–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Richardson JK, Chung T, Schultz JS, Hurvitz E (1997) A familial predisposition toward lumbar disc injury. Spine 22:1487–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Riihimäki H, Tola S, Videman T, Hänninen K (1989) Low back pain and occupation. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. Spine 14:204–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Riihimaki H, Mattsson T, Zitting A, Wickstrom G, Hanninen K, Waris P (1990) Radiographically detectable degenerative changes of the lumbar spine among concrete reinforcement workers and house painters. Spine 15:114–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schönström NSR, Bolender NF, Spengler DM (1985) The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine. Spine 10:806–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vanharanta H, Heliovaara M, Korpi J, Troup JD (1987) Occupation, work load and the size and shape of lumbar vertebral canals. Scand J Work Environ Health 13:146–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Videman T, Battié MC (1999) The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine 24:1164–1168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Videman T, Nurminen M, Troup JD (1990) 1990 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Lumbar spinal pathology in cadaveric material in relation to history of back pain, occupation, and physical loading. Spine 15:728–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Videman T, Battié MC, Gibbons LE, Maravilla K, Manninen H, Kaprio J (2003) Association between back pain history and lumbar MRI findings. Spine 28:582–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vingard E, Alfredsson L, Hagberg M, Kilbom A, Theorell T, Waldenstrom M, Hjelm EW, Wiktorin C, Hogstedt C (2000) To what extent do current and past physical and psychosocial occupational factors explain care-seeking for low back pain in a working population? Results from the Musculoskeletal Intervention Center-Norrtalje Study. Spine 25:493–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Von Korff M (2002) Point of view. Spine 27:994

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Naples, Italy

    Massimo Mariconda, Olimpio Galasso, Luigi Imbimbo & Carlo Milano

  2. Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Catanzaro “Magna Græcia”, Catanzaro, Italy

    Giovanni Lotti

Authors
  1. Massimo Mariconda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olimpio Galasso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luigi Imbimbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giovanni Lotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carlo Milano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Mariconda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mariconda, M., Galasso, O., Imbimbo, L. et al. Relationship between alterations of the lumbar spine, visualized with magnetic resonance imaging, and occupational variables. Eur Spine J 16, 255–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0036-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0036-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation