Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial

  • Orginal Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This randomized controlled clinical trial compares the effectiveness of a biopsychosocial treatment with a solely conventional biomedical therapy in patients with subacute low back pain using parameters for pain intensity, functional status, depressive dysfunction and work performance. Sixty-four patients with a first-time sick leave between 3 and 12 weeks due to low back pain were randomly assigned to either a conventional biomedical therapy (MT; n=33) group, or a biopsychosocial therapy (BT; n=31) group including a psychotherapeutic module; both in accordance with a standardized 3 weeks inpatient treatment. Pain intensity, functional back capacity, clinical parameters and depressive dysfunction revealed significant improvement in both treatment groups at end of 3 weeks therapy (T1). However, at 6 months (T2), analysis revealed significant better results for nearly all parameters in the BT group that showed further improvement from T1 to T2, whereas the values in the MT group deteriorated from T1 back to the baseline values. During the 2-year period after therapy, 10% in MT and 59% in BT required no further sick leave due to low back pain. The results of the study indicate that a psychotherapeutic element in the treatment of low back pain appears to positively influence pain, functional status and work performance when conducted at an early stage of chronification and helps in the achievement of a better outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaranta H, Rytokoski U, Rissanen A et al (1994) Intensive physical and psychosocial training program for patients with chronic low back pain. A controlled clinical trial. Spine 19:1339–1349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Altmaier EM, Lehmann TR, Russell DW, Weinstein JN, Feng Kao C (1992) The effectiveness of psychological interventions for the rehabilitation of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial evaluation. Pain 49:329–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendix Af, Bendix T, Labriola M (1998) Functional restoration for chronic low back pain: two-year follow-up of two randomized trials. Spine 23:717–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bendix AF, Bendix T, Lund C et al (1997) Comparison of three intensive programs for chronic low back pain patients: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study with one year follow-up. Scand J Rehab Med 29:81–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bortz J, Döring N (2002) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burton AK, Waddell G et al (1999) Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. Spine 24:2484–2491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burton AK (1997) Back injury and work loss. Spine 22:2575–2580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherkin DC (1998) Primary care research on low back pain. The state of the science. Spine 23:1997–2002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clauw DJ, Williams D, Lauerman W et al (1999) Pain sensitivity as a correlate of clinical status in individuals with chronic low back pain. Spine 24:2035–2041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM. (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frost M, Stuckey S, Smalley LA et al (1982) Reliability of measuring trunk motions in centimeters. Phys Ther 62:1431–1437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K et al (2001) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. B Med J 322:1511–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haldorsen EM, Grasdal AL, Skouen JS, Risa AE, Kronholm K, Ursin H (2002). Is there a right treatment for a particular patient group? Comparison of ordinary treatment, light multidisciplinary treatment, and extensive multidisciplinary treatment for long-term sick-listed employees with musculoskeletal pain. Pain 95:49–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O (1995) Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 20:473–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jousset N, Fanello S, Bontoux L, Dubus V, Billabert C, Vielle B, Roquelaure Y, Penneau-Fontbonne D, Richard I (2004). Effects of functional restoration versus 3 hours per week physical therapy: a randomized controlled study. Spine 29:487–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M et al (2001) Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults. Spine 26:262–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koes BW, Bouter LM, Van Mameren H (1992) The effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy, and treatment by the general practitioner for nonspecific back and neck complaints: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 17:28–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kohlmann T, Raspe HH (1996) Der Funktionsfragebogen Hannover zur alltagsnahen Diagnostik der Funktionsbeeinträchtigung durch Rückenschmerzen (FFbH-R). Rehabilitation 35:1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kössler F (1998) Arbeitsbedingte Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen (MSE)—eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung. ErgoMed 5:220–236

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lenhardt U, Elkeles T, Rosenbrock R (1994) Rückenschmerzen—Befunde epidemiologischer Forschung. Z Allg Med 70:561–565

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C et al (1992) Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach. Spine 17:641–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindström I, Ohlund C, Eek C et al (1992) The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with a operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 72:279–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ljunggren AE, Weber H, Kogstad O et al (1997) Effect of exercise on sick leave due to low back pain. Spine 22:1610–1617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P et al (1997) A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 22:2911–2918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Main CJ, Waddell G (1998) Behavioral responses of examination. Spine 23:2367–2371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S et al (1999) A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain. Spine 24:2435–2448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin PR, Rose MJ, Nichols PJR et al (1980) Physiotherapy exercises for low back pain: process and clinical outcome. Int Rehabil Med 8:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mellin G (1985) Physical therapy for chronic low back pain: correlation between spinal mobility and treatment outcome. Scand J Rehab Med 17:163–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Moffett J, Torgerson D, Bell-Syer S et al (1999) Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. Br Med J 319:279–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nickolas MK, Wilson PH, Goyen J (1992) Comparison of cognitive behavioral group treatment and an alternative nonpsychological treatment for chronic low back pain. Pain 48:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Patijn J, Durinck JR (1991) Effects of manual medicine on absenteeism. J Man Med 6:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  32. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 3:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schonstein E, Kenny D, Keating J, Koes B, Herbert RD (2003). Physical conditioning programs for workers with back and neck pain; a cochrane systematic review. Spine 28:E391–E395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwartz FW, Bitzer EM, Döring H et al (1999) Gesundheitsausgaben für chronische Krankheit in Deutschland. Lengerich, Berlin, Düsseldorf, Leipzig, Riga, Scottsdale, Wien, Zagreb: Papst

  35. Szpalski M, Hayez JP (1994) Objective functional assessment of the efficacy of tenoxicam in the treatment of acute back pain. A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Rheumatol 33:74–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Taimela S, Takala EP, Asklöf T et al (2000) Active treatment of chronic neck pain. Spine 25:1021–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas E, Silman AJ, Croft PR et al (1999) Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care. A prospective study. Brit Med J 318:1662–1667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Turner JA, Clancy SC, Mc Quade KJ et al (1990) Effectiveness of behavioral therapy for chronic low back pain: a component analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 58:573–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Turner JA, Jensen MP (1993) Efficacy of cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain. Pain 52:169–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. van Tulder MW, Koes BW (2002) Low back pain and sciatica: chronic. Clin Evid 8:1171–87

    Google Scholar 

  41. Von Korff M (1994) Studying the natural history of back pain. Spine 19:2041S–2046S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Waddell G, Burton AK (2001) Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med 51:124–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E et al (1980) Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 5:117–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Waddell G (1987) A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 12:632–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany

    Marcus Schiltenwolf & Matthias Buchner

  2. Psychiatric Clinic, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Bernhard Heindl

  3. Druckkammerzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany

    Johannes von Reumont

  4. General and psychosomatic medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Annette Müller & Wolfgang Eich

Authors
  1. Marcus Schiltenwolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthias Buchner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernhard Heindl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes von Reumont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Annette Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wolfgang Eich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Schiltenwolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiltenwolf, M., Buchner, M., Heindl, B. et al. Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 15, 1083–1092 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0008-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0008-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation