Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cement leakage during vertebroplasty: an underestimated problem?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Overall, vertebroplasty has a low complication rate. Nevertheless, severe complications can occur. The majority of these are related to cement extrusion. The rate of cement leakage is often obtained by X-ray, with only a single leak registration per vertebra. Detection rate of leaks in comparison with CT and inter-observer reliability for X-ray is, in large parts, unknown. We conducted this study to determine the value of fluoroscopy and X-ray used to detect cement leakage as compared to CT scans. Intraoperative findings in lateral fluoroscopy by the surgeon, and postoperative findings in X-rays by two orthopaedic surgeons, were compared with CT scans for the same study group. Multiple cement leakage was considered, and agreement rate was determined. The detection rate for leaks was 34% for lateral X-ray and 48% for lateral and AP view. Additional AP views only enhanced the detection of leaks in the segmental veins. The agreement rate between fluoroscopy/X-ray and CT scans ranged between 66% and 74%, while inter-observer reliability showed only fair agreement. The rate of cement leaks in vertebroplasty is high if multiple leaks are considered in CT scans. Detection rates using X-rays are low and complicated by only fair inter-observer agreement. Leaks in the basivertebral veins are frequently misinterpreted and can lead to severe complications. Therefore, CT scans should be obtained to calculate the exact leakage rate and to assess persistent or new pain occurring postoperatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez L, Pérez-Higueras A, Quinones D, Calvo E, Rossi RE (2003) Vertebroplasty in the treatment of vertebral tumors: postprocedural outcome and quality of life. Eur Spine J 12:356–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25:923–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradford DS, McBride GG (1987) Surgical management of thoracolumbar spine fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits. Clin Orthop 218:201–216

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Assaker R, Leblond D, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Clarisse J (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200:525–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, Le Gars D (1998) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate. Technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 36:533–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA (2003) Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 114:257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R, Chlan Fourney J, Suki D, Ahrar K, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL (2003) Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients. J Neurosurg 98:21–30

    Google Scholar 

  9. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D (1987) Note preliminaire sur le traitement des angiomes vertebraux par vertebroplastie acrylique percutanee. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA (2001) New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 26:1511–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaughen JR, Jensen ME, Schweickert PA, Kaufmann TJ, Marx WF, Kallmes DF (2002) Relevance of antecedent venography in percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:594–600

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harrington KD (2001) Major neurological complications following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate : a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A:1070–1073

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jang JS, Lee SH, Jung SK (2002) Pulmonary embolism of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a report of three cases. Spine 27:E416–E418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ and Dion JE (1997) Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1897–1904

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lane JI, Maus TP, Wald JT, Thielen KR, Bobra S, Luetmer PH (2002) Intravertebral clefts opacified during vertebroplasty: pathogenesis, technical implications, and prognostic significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1642–1646

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee BJ, Lee SR, Yoo TY (2002) Paraplegia as a complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. Spine 27:E419–E422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26:1631–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin JB, Jean B, Sugiu K, San Millan Ruiz D, Piotin M, Murphy K, Rufenacht B, Muster M, Rufenacht DA (1999) Vertebroplasty: clinical experience and follow-up results. Bone 25:11s–15s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McGraw JK, Lippert JA, Minkus KD, Rami PM, Davis TM, Budzik RF (2002) Prospective evaluation of pain relief in 100 patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty: results and follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:883–886

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moreland DB, Landi MK, Grand W (2001) Vertebroplasty: techniques to avoid complications. Spine J 1:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Padovani B, Kasriel O, Brunner P, Peretti Viton P (1999) Pulmonary embolism caused by acrylic cement: a rare complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:375–377

    Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips FM, Todd Wetzel F, Lieberman I, Campbell Hupp M (2002) An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine 27:2173–2178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ratliff J, Nguyen T, Heiss J (2001) Root and spinal cord compression from methylmethacrylate vertebroplasty. Spine 26:E300–E302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryu KS, Park CK, Kim MC, Kang JK (2002) Dose-dependent epidural leakage of polymethylmethacrylate after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg 96:56–61

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro S, Abel T, Purvines S (2003) Surgical removal of epidural and intradural polymethylmethacrylate extravasation complicating percutaneous vertebroplasty for an osteoporotic lumbar compression fracture. Case report. J Neurosurg 98:90–92

    Google Scholar 

  27. Watts NB, Harris ST and Genant HK (2001) Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int 12:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wenger M, Markwalder TM (1999) Surgically controlled, transpedicular methyl methacrylate vertebroplasty with fluoroscopic guidance. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:625–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE (1968) The Paraspinal sacrospinalis—splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:919–926

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong W, Reiley MA, Garfin S (2000) Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. J Womens Imag 2:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yeom JS, Kim WJ, Choy WS, Lee CK, Chang BS, Kang JW (2003) Leakage of cement in percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic compression fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:83–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and SCI, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

    R Schmidt, B Cakir, T Mattes, W Puhl & M Richter

  2. Department of Radiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

    M Wegener

  3. RKU, Orthopädische Klinik mit Querschnittgelähmtenzentrum der Universität Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    R Schmidt

Authors
  1. R Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B Cakir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T Mattes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M Wegener
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W Puhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, R., Cakir, B., Mattes, T. et al. Cement leakage during vertebroplasty: an underestimated problem?. Eur Spine J 14, 466–473 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0839-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0839-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation