Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparison between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system for in vitro biomechanical testing of the L5-S1 spinal unit was conducted. The objective was to compare the compliance and the coupling of the L5-S1 unit measured with an unconstrained and a partially constrained test for the three major physiological motions of the human spine. Very few studies have compared unconstrained and partially constrained testing systems using the same cadaveric functional spinal units (FSUs). Seven human L5-S1 units were therefore tested on both a pneumatic, unconstrained, and a servohydraulic, partially constrained system. Each FSU was tested along three motions: flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR). The obtained kinematics on both systems is not equivalent, except for the FE case, where both motions are similar. The directions of coupled motions were similar for both tests, but their magnitudes were smaller in the partially constrained configuration. The use of a partially constrained system to characterize LB and AR of the lumbosacral FSU decreased significantly the measured stiffness of the segment. The unconstrained system is today’s “gold standard” for the characterization of FSUs. The selected partially constrained method seems also to be an appropriate way to characterize FSUs for specific applications. Care should be taken using the latter method when the coupled motions are important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a,b
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abumi K, Panjabi MM, Duranceau J (1989) Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices. Part III. Stability provided by six spinal fixation devices. Spine 14:1249–1255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams M, Hutton W (1981) The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine. Spine 6:241–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed AM, Duncan NA, Burke DL (1990) The effect of facet geometry on the axial torque-rotation response of lumbar motion segments. Spine 15:391–401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson GBJ, Schultz AB (1979) Effects of fluid injection on mechanical properties of intervertebral discs. J Biomech 12:453–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asazuma T, Stokes IAF, Moreland MS et al (1990) Intersegmental spinal flexibility with lumbosacral instrumentation: an in vitro biomechanical investigation. Spine 15:1153–1158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashman RB, Birch JB, Bone LB et al (1988) Mechanical testing of spinal instrumentation. Clin Orthop 227:113–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boden SD, Martin C, Rudolph R et al (1994) Increase of motion between lumbar vertebrae after excision of the capsule and cartilage of the facets-a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1847–1853

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brodke DS, Dick JC, Kunz DN et al (1997) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage. Spine 22:26–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Charrière E (2002) A calcium phosphate implant with controlled macroporosity for anterior L5-S1 interbody fusion. Ph.D. Thesis No. 2507, EPFL-Lausanne

  10. Edwards WT (1991) Biomechanics of posterior lumbar fixation. Analysis of testing methodologies. Spine 16:1224–1232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goel VK, Goyal S, Clark C et al (1985) Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine: effect of discectomy. Spine 10:543–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goel VK, Wilder DG, Pope MH et al (1995) Controversy: biomechanical testing of the spine. Load-controlled versus displacement-controlled analysis. Spine 20:2354–2357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grassmann S, Oxland TR, Gerich U et al (1998) Constrained testing conditions affect the axial rotation response of the lumbar functional spinal units. Spine 23:1155–1162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunzburg R, Hutton W, Fraser R (1991) Axial rotation of the lumbar spine and the effect of flexion. Spine 16:22–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haher T, O’Brien M, Felmly WT et al (1992) Instantaneous axis of rotation as a function of the three columns of the spine. Spine 17 (Suppl):S149–S154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haher TR, O’Brien M, Dryer JW et al (1994) The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability: identification of alternative paths of loading. Spine 19:2667–2671

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YE, Goel VK (1990) Effects of testing mode on the biomechanical response of a spinal motion segment. J Biomech 23:289–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinzel GL, Hall AS, Hillberry BM (1972) Measurement of the total motion between two body segments-I analytical development. J Biomech 5:93–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunz DN, McCabe RP, Zdeblick TA et al (1994) A multi-degree of freedom system for biomechanical testing. J Biomech Eng 116:371–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lund T, Oxland TR, Jost B et al (1998) Interbody cage stabilization in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:351–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nachemson AL, Schultz AB, Berkson MH. Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments: influence of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration. Spine 4:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oxland TR, Crisco JJ III, Panjabi MM et al (1992) The effect of injury on rotational coupling at the lumbosacral joint. A biomechanical investigation. Spine 17:74–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Panjabi MM (1988) Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: 1. A conceptual framework. Spine 13:1129–1134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Panjabi MM, Brand RM, White AA (1976) Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine. J Biomech 9:185–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Panjabi MM, Kato Y, Hoffman H et al (2000) A study of stiffness protocol as exemplified by testing of a burst fracture model in sagittal plane. Spine 21:2748–2754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Yamamoto I, et al (1994) Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by the three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:413–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pearcy M, Portek I, Shepherd J (1984) Three-dimensional X-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 9:294–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB (1984) Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine 9:582–587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schultz AB, Warwick DN, Berkson MH et al (1979) Mechanical properties of human lumbar motion segments-part I: responses in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. J Biomech Eng 101:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tencer AF, Ahmed AM, Burke DL (1982) Some static mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral joint, intact and injured. J Biomech Eng 104:193–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tencer AF, Hampton D, Eddy S (1995) Biomechanical properties of threaded inserts for lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Spine 20:2408–2414

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Schmitt H et al (1994) A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Eur Spine J 3:91–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Woltring HJ, Huiskes R, De Lange A et al (1985) Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. Biomechanics 18:379–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the “Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Laboratory of Applied Mechanics and Reliability Analysis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland

    E. A. Charriere, M. Caride & P. K. Zysset

  2. Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande, Lausanne, Switzerland

    E. A. Charriere & P. Mordasini

  3. M.E. Müller Institute for Biomechanics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    T. Beutler & T. E. Orr

  4. , Les Bosquets de Paudille 5, 1803, Chardonne, Switzerland

    E. A. Charriere

Authors
  1. E. A. Charriere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Beutler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Caride
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Mordasini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. E. Orr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. K. Zysset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Charriere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charriere, E.A., Beutler, T., Caride, M. et al. Compliance of the L5-S1 spinal unit: a comparative study between an unconstrained and a partially constrained system. Eur Spine J 15, 74–81 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0807-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0807-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation