Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Functional results and the risk factors of reoperations after lumbar disc surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors such as driving motor vehicles, sedentary occupations, vibration, smoking, previous full-term pregnancies, physical inactivity, increased body mass index (BMI), and a tall stature are associated with symptomatic disc herniations. Fitness and strength is postulated to protect an individual from disc rupture. The objective of our study was to determine the pain levels and differences of functional and economic situations of patients who had undergone one or more than one operation due to lumbar disc herniation and to put forward the effect of risk factors that may be potential, especially from the aspect of undergoing reoperation. Patients who had undergone one (n=46) or more than one operation (n=34) due to lumbar disc herniation were included in the study. It was a prospective study with evaluation on the day the patients were discharged and at second and sixth months after lumbar disc operation. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used in determining the functional disability associated with back pain; the Prolo Functional Economic Rating Scale (Prolo scale) was used in determining the effect of back pain on functional and economic situations. In the ODI measurements made in the postoperative second and sixth months, significant differences appeared in favor of patients who had undergone one operation (p<0.05). According to the Prolo scale, it was found that the economic situation was better in the sixth month and the functional situation was better in the second and sixth months in patients having undergone one operation (p<0.05). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the lack of regular physical exercise was a significant predictor for reoperation (OR, 4.595; CI, 1.38–15.28), whereas gender, age, BMI, occupation, or smoking did not indicate so much significance as regular exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA, Mannion AF, Dolan P (1999) Personal risk factors for first-time low back pain. Spine 24 (23):2497–2505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui JI, Bjornsson A (1990) Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 3:205–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruske-Hohlfeld I, Merritt JL, Onofrio BM, Stonnington HH, Offord KP, Bergstralh ES, Beard CM, Melton LJ 3rd, Kurland LT (1990) Incidence of lumbar disc surgery: A population-based study in Olmsted country, Minnesota, 1950–1979. Spine 15:31–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cassisi JE, Robinson ME, O’Conner P, MacMillan M (1993) Trunk strength and lumbar paraspinal muscle activity during isometric exercise in chronic low back pain. Spine 18:245–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Bigos S (1994) Characteristics in medicare beneficiaries associated with reoperation after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 19:1329–1334

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E (2000) Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine 25(8):1015–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001) Basic and clinical bioistatistics. 3rd edn, Langemedical, Mc Graus-Hill Medical Publish Division, pp. 245–46,138–139

  8. Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW (2000) Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy? Spine 25(12):1523–1532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2002) Young investigator award 2001 winner: risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 27(2):125–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank JC, Abdu WA, Hanscom B, Winstein J N (2002) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability scale. Physical Ther 81:776–788

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritzell P, Hagg O,Wessberg PA (2001) 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies.Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 26, 2521–32, discussion 2532–2434

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gustavsen R (1985) Training therapy. Thieme, New York, p. 33

  14. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2002) Characteristics of patients with chronic low back pain selected for surgery. A comparison with the general population. A report from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27(11):1223–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagen KB,Tambs K,Bjerkedal T (2002) A prospective cohort study of risk factors for disability retirement because of back pain in the general working population. Spine 27(16):1790–1796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Howe J, Frymoyer JW (1985) The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 10:804–805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keskimaki I, Seitsalo S, Österman H, Rissanen P (2000) Reoperations after lumbar disc surgery. Spine 25(12):1500–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kjellby-Wendt G, Styf J (1988) Early active training after lumbar discectomy: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Spine 23:2345–2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Korres DS, Loupassis G, Stamos K (1992) Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods. Eur Spine J 1:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lefort SM, Hannah E (1994) Return to work following an aquafitness and muscle strenthening program for the low back injured. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75

  23. Lewis PS, Weir BK, Broad RW, Grace MG (1987) Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67:49–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Little DG, MacDonald D (1994) The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index Score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 19:2139–2143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Juntura EV, Lamminen A (2000) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 25(4):487–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Manniche C, Skall HF, Braendhohlt L, Christensen BH, Christophersen L, Ellegard B, Ingerslev M, Jorgensen OE, Larsen E (1993) Clinical trial of postoperative dynamic back exercises after first lumbar discectomy. Spine 18(3):92–97

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose- Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A (1994) Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson’s and modified Spengler’s score systems. Dan Med Bull 41:110–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhoft J, Jordan A (1994) Back pain, sciatica and disability following first-time conventional haemilaminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Use of “ low back pain rating scale” as a postal questionnaire. Dan Med Bull 41:103–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pappas CTE, Harrigton T, Sonntag V (1992) Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 30(6):862–865

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pransky G, Benjamin K, Hill-Fotouhi C, Fletcher KE, Himmelstein J, Katz JN (2002) Work-related outcomes in occupational low back pain. Spine 27(8):864–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Prolo DJ, Okulund SA, Butcher M (1986) Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operation. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar inter body fusions. Spine 11:601–606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roland M, Fairbankt J (2000) The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 25(24):3115–3124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roy SH, CJ DL, Casavant DA (1989) Lumbar muscle fatigue and chronic lower back pain. Spine 14:992–1001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, Kim NH (2001) Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: results of operative management. Spine 26(6):672–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Taimela S, Diederich, Hubsch Marc, Heinricy M (2000) The role of physical exercise and ınactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain. Spine: 25(14) 1809–1816

  36. Thorvaldsen P, Sorensen EB (1989) Short-term outcome in lumbar spine surgery. Acta Neurochir 101:121–125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Weber H (1994) The natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention. Spine 19(19):2234–2238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Videman T, Battiie M (1999) The influence of occupation on lumbar degeneration. Spine 241164–1168

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dokuz Eylül University School of Physical Therapy, 35340 İnciraltı, Izmir, Turkey

    Bilge Kara & Zeliha Tulum

  2. Dokuz Eylül University Medicine Faculty Neurosurgical Department, 35340 İnciraltı, Izmir, Turkey

    Ümit Acar

Authors
  1. Bilge Kara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeliha Tulum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ümit Acar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilge Kara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kara, B., Tulum, Z. & Acar, Ü. Functional results and the risk factors of reoperations after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 14, 43–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0695-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0695-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation