Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Whiplash injuries in Finland: the situation 3 years later

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to define the influence of whiplash injuries on the perceived condition of health 3 years after injury. We evaluated remaining symptoms and the use of health services. Insurance companies provided reports and medical certificates from traffic accidents in Finland in 1998, for those injured who had agreed to take part in the study. Participants in the 1-year follow-up study answered a self-report questionnaire. Three years after the whiplash-causing accident, 11.8% of participants reported that injury symptoms had caused their health to deteriorate significantly as compared with before the accident. Neck pain was the most common single symptom, reported by 14.6% of respondents. The severity of the initial symptoms according to the WAD classification is reflected in the subject’s self-perception of health after 3 years. A remarkable 10–17% of respondents still used health services regularly because of the symptoms. Although some of the injured had improved in the long term, some reported that their health condition was worse after 3 years than at the 1-year follow-up. The percentage of respondents reporting a significant health deterioration remains unchanged 3 years after the whiplash injury. These findings illuminate the importance of early recognition of risk factors for long-term disability and the primary treatment and rehabilitation procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berglund A, Alfredsson L, Jensen I, Cassidy D, Nygren Å (2001) The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future health complaints. Jour Clin Epidemiol 54:851–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunketrop L, Nordholm L, Carlsson J (2002) A descriptive analysis of disorders in patients 17 years following motor vehicle accidents. Eur Spine J 11:227–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Castro WHM, Meyer SJ, Becke MER, Nentwig CG, Hein MF, Ercan BI et al (2001) No stress—no whiplash? Prevalence of “whiplash” symptoms following exposure to a placebo rear-end collision. Int J Legal Med 114:316–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L (2000) Is a lifetime history of neck injury in a traffic collision associated with prevalent neck pain, headache and depressive symptomatology? Accid Anal Prev 32:151–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C (2001) A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 26:E445–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrari R, Kwan O, Russell AS, Pearce JMS, Schrader H (1999) The best approach to the problem of whiplash? One ticket to Lithuania, please. Clin Exp Rheumatol 17:321–326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hildingsson C, Toolanen G (1990) Outcome after soft-tissue injury of the cervical spine. A prospective study of 93 car-accident victims. Acta Orthop Scand 61:357–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovell ME, Galasko CSB (2002) Whiplash disorders—a review. Injury 33:97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayou R, Tyndel S, Bryant B (1997) Long-term outcome of motor vehicle accident injury. Psychosom Med 59:578–584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miettinen T, Lindgren KA, Airaksinen O, Leino E (2002) Whiplash injuries in Finland: A prospective 1-year follow-up study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20:399–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richrdson WJ, De Vellis RF (2002) Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine 27:515–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scmitz N, Kruse J, Tress W (1999) Psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in German primary care sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 100:462–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR et al (1995) Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine 20:S1-S73

    Google Scholar 

  14. Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC (1996) Soft-tissue injuries of the cervical spine, 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 78B:955–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suissa S, Harder S, Veilleux M (2001) The relation between initial symptoms and signs and prognosis of whiplash. Eur Spine J 10:44–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Söderlund A, Lindberg P (1999) Long-term functional and psychological problems in whiplash associated disorders. Int J Rehabil Res 22:77–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Varjonen J, Romanov K, Heikkilä K (1997) Self-rated depression in 12,603 middle-aged adults. Nord J Psychiatry 51:331–338

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported financially by the Finnish Motor Insurers’ Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Miettinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miettinen, T., Leino, E., Airaksinen, O. et al. Whiplash injuries in Finland: the situation 3 years later. Eur Spine J 13, 415–418 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0677-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0677-5

Keywords

Navigation