Abstract
Efficiency of cantilever based continuous piezoelectric energy harvester is reduced by charge cancellation due to changes of mechanical strain in higher vibration modes. Therefore, in order to prevent the charge cancellation, various segmentation techniques are adopted at respective strain nodes of higher modes. In this paper, two distributed parameter models are developed for the traditional segment techniques of the cantilever with tip mass configuration in ‘n’ number of strain nodes. The electrodes of piezoelectric layer are segmented in 1st model whereas piezoelectric layer along with electrodes are segmented in 2nd model. In both the models, the bimorph segmented electrodes are connected parallel with external resistive loads. The analytical solutions of electrical frequency response under harmonic base excitations are obtained through Euler–Bernoulli beam theory for 1st model and extended Hamilton beam assumptions for 2nd model. The developed analytical models are validated using numerical models established by COMSOL. The results demonstrate that the performance of proposed segmented piezoelectric layer model outperforms than traditional model of segmented electrode piezoelectric energy harvester.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelkefi A (2016) Aeroelastic energy harvesting. A review. Int J Eng Sci 100:112–135
Abdelkefi A, Barsallo N, Tang L, Yang Y, Hajj MR (2013) Modeling, validation, and performance of low-frequency piezoelectric energy harvesters Smart Mater. Struct 0:1–16
Baruh H, Callahan J (1995) Modal analysis using segmented piezoelectric sensors. AIAA J 33:12
Baruh H, Callahan J (1999) Modal sensing of circular cylindrical shells using segmented piezoelectric elements. Smart Mater Struct 8:125–135
Batra RC, Vel SS (2001) Analysis of piezoelectric bimorphs and plates with segmented actuators. Thin-Walled Struct Elsevier 39:23–44
Batra RC, Senthil S, Vel (2000) Cylindrical bending of laminated plates with distributed and segmented piezoelectric actuators/sensors. AIAA J 38:5
Callahan J, Baruh H (1996) Active control of flexible structures by use of segmented piezoelectric elements. J Guid Control Dyn 19:4
Crawley et al (1987) Use of piezoelectric actuators as elements of intelligent structures. J AIAA 25:1373–1385
Dow ABA, Schneider M, Koo D, Al-Rubaye HA, Bittner A, Schmid U, Kherani N (2012) Modeling the performance of a micro machined piezoelectric energy harvester. Microsyst Technol 18:1035–1043
Dufour I, Heinrich SM, Josse F (2007) Theoretical analysis of strong-axis bending mode vibrations for resonant micro cantilever (Bio) chemical sensors in gas or liquid phase. J Microelectromech Syst 16(1):44–49
Erturk A, Inman DJ (2009) An experimentally validated bimorph cantilever model for piezoelectric energy harvesting from base excitations. Smart Mater Struct 18:025009
Erturk A, Inman DJ (2011) Piezoelectric energy harvesting, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Erturk A, Tarazaga PA, Inman DJ (2009) Effect of strain nodes and electrode configuration on piezoelectric energy harvesting from cantilevered beams. J Vib Acoust 13:10
Fang D, Zheng F, Chen B, Wang Y, Fang Y, Yang P, Wen X, Peng C, Xai S (2015) Computation of capacitance and electrostatic forces for the electrostatically driving actuators considering fringe effects. Microsyst Technol 21:2089–2096
Jafari H, Ghodsi A, Ghazavi MR, Azizi S (2017) Novel mass detection based on magnetic excitation in anti-resonance region. Microsyst Technol 23:1377–1383
Jia Y, Seshia AA (2016) Five topologies of cantilever-based MEMS piezoelectric vibration energy harvesters: a numerical and experimental comparison. Microsyst Technol 22:2841–2852
Kashyap R, Lenka TR, Baishya S (2015) A model for doubly clamped piezoelectric energy harvesters with segmented electrodes. IEEE Electron Device Lett 36:12
Kashyap R, Lenka TR, Baishya S (2016) Distributed parameter modeling of cantilevered-d33-mode piezoelectric energy harvesters. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 63:3
Kodali P (2014) Segmented electrodes for piezoelectric energy harvesters. IEEE Electron Device Lett 35:4
Krishnasamy M, Lenka TR (2017) Distributed parameter model for assorted piezoelectric harvester to prevent charge cancellation. IEEE Sens Lett 1:3
Lee S, Byeng D (2011) A new piezoelectric energy harvesting design concept: multimodal energy harvesting skin. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectr Freq 58:3
Li P, Gao S, Tong H, Lisen C (2016) Theoretical analysis and experimental study for nonlinear hybrid piezoelectric and electromagnetic energy harvester. Microsyst Technol 22:727–739
Ostasevicius V, Janusas G, Milasauskaite I, Zilys M, Kizauskiene L (2015) Peculiarities of the third natural frequency vibrations of a cantilever for the improvement of energy harvesting. Sensors 15:12594–12612
Shan X, Song R, Fan M, Deng J, Xie T (2016) A novel method for improving the energy harvesting performance of piezoelectric flag in a uniform flow. Ferroelectrics 500:283–290
Stewarta M, Weaver PM, Cain M (2012) Charge redistribution in piezoelectric energy harvesters. Appl Phys Lett 100:073901
Sze KY, Yao LQ (2000) Modelling smart structures with segmented piezoelectric sensors and actuators. J Sound Vib 235:495–520
Tzou HS, Fu HO (1992) A study on segmentation of distributed piezoelectric sensors and actuators. Active Control Noise Vib ASME 38:239–246
Wang H, Tang L, Shan X, Xie T, Yang Y (2014) Modeling and performance evaluation of a piezoelectric energy harvester with segmented electrodes. Smart Struct Syst 14:247–266
Zhou D et al (2005) Dynamic characteristics of a beam and distributed spring-mass system. Int J Solids Struct 10:0020–7683
Zizys D, Rimvydas G, Rolanas D, Vytautas O, Vytautas D (2016) Segmentation of a vibrio-shock cantilever-type piezoelectric energy harvester operating in higher transverse vibration modes. Sensors 16:11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishnasamy, M., Lenka, T.R. Distributed parameter modeling for autonomous charge extraction of various multilevel segmented piezoelectric energy harvesters. Microsyst Technol 24, 1577–1587 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3559-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3559-6