Skip to main content
Log in

Acceleration sensitivity of tuning fork gyroscopes: theoretical model, simulation and experimental verification

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A two degrees of freedom (DOF) coupled model is investigated in this paper to analyze the acceleration sensitivity of MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes (TFG) and approaches of decreasing the acceleration sensitivity are presented. Since two tines of TFGs are asymmetric in the mass, stiffness and damping caused by the technological defects, there exists the coupled effect between two tines leading to the invalidity of a single DOF model. Therefore, a two DOFs model is established and the matrix perturbation technique is used to calculate the dynamic responses of the two tines by applying the common-mode acceleration. Our quantitative analysis reveals that the displacement difference is large in the in- and anti-phase modal frequencies between two tines, arising from the unsynchronized motion of two tines due to stiffness imbalance. The FEM simulations coincide with our theoretical calculations. Meanwhile, we take advantage of the experimental data from the other researches to verify our theoretical model and analytical expressions. Our results demonstrate that the acceleration sensitivity of TFGs can be reduced by increasing the coupled stiffness ratio, modal frequency and sense beams widths which are insensitive to technological dispersions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alper SE, Akin T (2004) Symmetrical and decoupled nickel microgyroscope on insulating substrate. Sens Actuator A Phys 115(2):336–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azgin k, Temiz Y, Akin T (2007) An SOI-MEMS tuning fork gyroscope with linearly coupled drive mechanism. In: Proceedings IEEE MEMS’07, Kobe, 2007, pp 607–610

  • Chen JC, Wada BK (1977) Matrix perturbation for structural dynamic analysis. AIAA J 15(8):1095–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SH, Liu YL, Huang DP (1984) Matrix perturbation of vibration modal analysis. In: Proceedings international modal analysis conference, Orlando, 1984, pp 698–704

  • Cho J, Gregory J, Naiafi K (2012) High-Q, 3kHz single-crystal silicon cylindrical rate-integrating gyro (CING). In: Proceedings MEMS, Paris, pp 172–175

  • Geen J (2004) Progress in integrated gyroscopes. In: Proceedings position, location, and navigation symposium (PLANS), Monterey, pp 1–6

  • Geen JA, Sherman SJ, Chang JF, Lewis SR (2002) Single-chip surface micromachined integrated gyroscope with 50/spl deg//h Allan deviation. IEEE J Solid-State Cir 37(12):1860–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazinczi R, Mollinger JR, Bossche A (2002) Environment-induced failure modes of thin film resonators. In: Proceedings SPIE, Melbourne, pp 258–268

  • Palaniapan M, Howe RT, Yasaitis J (2003) Performance comparison of integrated Z-axis frame gyroscopes. In: Proceedings IEEE MEMS’03, Kyoto, pp 482–485

  • Prikhodko IP, Zotov SA, Trusov AA, Shkel AM (2011) Sub-degree-per-hour silicon MEMS rate sensor with 1 million Q-factor. In: Proceedings TRANSDUCERS’11, Beijing, pp 2809–2812

  • Prikhodko IP, Zotov SA, Trusov AA, Shkel AM (2012) Foucault pendulum on a chip: rate integrating silicon MEMS gyroscope. Sens Actuator A Phys 177:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield A, Trusov A, Shkel A (2007) Multi degree of freedom tuning fork gyroscope demonstrating shock rejection. In: Proceedings IEEE SENSORS Conference, Atlanta, pp 120–123

  • Shkel AM (2006) Type I and type II micromachined vibratory gyroscopes. In: Proceedings position, location, and navigation symposium (PLANS), San Diego, pp 586–593

  • Singh TP, Sugano K, Tsuchiya T, Tabata O (2012) Frequency response of in-plane coupled resonators for investigating the acceleration sensitivity of MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes. Microsyst Technol 18(6):797–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh TP, Sugano K, Tsuchiya T, Tabata O (2013) Experimental verification of frequency decoupling effect on acceleration sensitivity in tuning fork gyroscopes using in-plane coupled resonators. Microsyst Technol 20(3):403–411

  • Trusov AA, Schofield AR, Shkel AM (2011) Micromachined rate gyroscope architecture with ultra-high quality factor and improved mode ordering. Sens Actuator A Phys 165(1):26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther A, Blanc CL, Delorme N, Deimerly Y, Anciant R, Willemin J (2013) Bias contributions in a MEMS tuning fork gyroscope. J Microelectromech Syst 22(2):303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie H, Fedder GK (2003) Integrated microelectromechanical gyroscopes. J Aerosp Eng 16(2):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon SW, Lee SW, Perkins NC, Najafi K (2007) Vibration sensitivity of MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes. In: IEEE SENSORS conference, pp 115–118

  • Yoon SW, Lee S, Najafi K (2012) Vibration-induced errors in MEMS tuning fork gyroscopes. Sens Actuators A Phys 180:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman MF, Sharma A, Ayazi F (2006) High performance matched-mode tuning fork gyroscope. In: Proceedings MEMS, Istanbul, pp 66–69

  • Zotov SA, Trusov A, Shkel A (2012) High-Range Angular rate sensor based on mechanical frequency modulation. J Microelectromech Syst 21(2):398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Defense Preliminary Research Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanwei Guan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guan, Y., Gao, S., Liu, H. et al. Acceleration sensitivity of tuning fork gyroscopes: theoretical model, simulation and experimental verification. Microsyst Technol 21, 1313–1323 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-014-2185-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-014-2185-9

Keywords

Navigation