Abstract
We conducted a laboratory study on six commercially available heat and moisture exchangers in order to determine and compare their water retaining efficiency and their contribution to airway resistance. The Gambro-Engstrom Edith Flex device was the most desirable of the six devices we evaluated in terms of its water retaining efficiency. The NMI Pneumoist 1 and the Siemens Servo Humidifier 153 units had good water retaining capacity but their higher airflow resistance need close monitoring, especially after prolonged clinical use. The Pall HME 15–22 and the Portex Humid-Vent 1 devices were also efficient in water retaining capacity. The Pall also demonstrated low airflow resistance and the minimum increase in airflow resistance after water immersion. The pathogen filtering capacity of the Pall should also be considered an additional advantage, especially in infected patients. The Terumo Breathaid device performed worst of all six devices, but it was still better than no HME at all.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chalon J, Patel C, Ali M, Ramanathan S, Capan L, Tang CK, Turndorf H: Humidity and the anesthetized patient. Anesthesiology 50:195–198, 1979
Fonkalsurd E, Sanchez M, Higashijima I, Arima E: Comparative study of the effects of dry vs humidified ventilation on canine lungs. Surgery 78:373–380, 1975
Knudsen J, Lombolt N, Wisborg K: Postoperative pulmonary complications using dry and humidified anesthetic gases. Br J Anaesth 45:363–368, 1973
Chalon J, Loew DA, Malenbranche J: Effects of dry anesthetic gases on tracheobronchial ciliated epithelium. Anesthesiology 37:338–342, 1972
Tausk HC, Miller R, Roberts RB: Maintenance of body temperature by heated humidification. Anesth Analg 55:719–723, 1976
Bancroft ML: Problems with humidifiers. Int Anesthesiol Clin 20:95–102, 1982
Craven DE, Goularte TA, Make BJ: Contaminated condensate in mechanical ventilator circuits: A risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia? Am Rev Resp Dis 129:625–628, 1984
Christopher CL, Saravolatz LD, Bush TL, Conway WA: The potential role of respiratory therapy equipment in cross infection. Am Rev Resp Dis 128:271–275, 1983
Sladen A, Laver M, Pontoppidan H: Pulmonary complications of water retention in prolonged mechanical ventilaltion. New Eng J Med 279:448–453, 1968
Klein EF, Graues SE: Hot pot tracheitis. Chest 65:225–226, 1974
Mapleson WW, Morgan JG, Hillard EK: Assessment of condenser humidifiers with special reference to a multiple gauze model. Brit Med J 1:300–305, 1963
Emergency Care Research Institute: Heat and moisture exchangers. Health Devices 12:155–167, 1983
Hay R, Miller WC: Efficacy of a new hygroscopic condenser humidifier. Crit Care Med 10:49–51, 1982
Oh TE, Thompson WR, Haywood DR: Disposable condenser humidifiers in intensive care. Anesth Intens Care 9:331–335, 1981
Ravenas B, Lindholm CE: The foam nose — a new disposable heat and moisture exchanger. Acta Anaesth Scand 23:34–39, 1979
Walker AKY, Bethune DW: A comparative study of condenser humidifiers. Anaesthesia 31:1086–1093,1976
Weeks DB: Evaluation of a disposable humidifier for use during anesthesia. Anesthesiology 54:337–340, 1981
Gedeon A, Mebius C: The hygroscopic condenser humidifier. Anaesthesia 34:1043–1047, 1979
Weeks DB, Ramsey FM: Laboratory investigation of six artificial noses during endotracheal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 62:758–763, 1983
Chalon J, Markham JP, Ali MM, Ramananthan S, Turndorf H: The Pall Ultipore breathing circuit filter — An effecient heat and moisture exchanger. Anesth Analg 63:366–370, 1984
Leigh JM, White MG: A new condenser humidifier. Anaesthesia 39:492–493, 1984
Mebius C: A comparative study of disposable humidifiers. Acta Anaesth Scand 27:403–409, 1983
MacIntyre NR, Anderson HR, Silver RM, Schuler FR, Coleman RE: Pulmonary function in mechanically ventilated patients during 24 hour use of a hygroscopic condenser humidifier. Chest 84:560–564, 1983
Ogino M, Koplic R, Mannino FL: Moisture conserving efficiency of condenser humidifiers. Anaesthesia 40:990–995, 1985
Shelly M, Bethune DW, Latimer RD: A comparison of five heat and moisture exchangers. Anaesthesia 41:527–532, 1986
Branson RD, Hurst JM: Laboratory evaluation of moisture output of seven airway heat and moisture exchangers. Resp Care 32:741–747,1987
Dery R: The evolution of heat and moisture in the respiratory tract during anesthesia with a non-rebreathing system. Can Anaesth Soc J 20:296–309, 1973
Tsuda T, Noguchi H, Takumi Y, Aochi O: Optimum humidification of air administered to a tracheostomy in dogs. Scanning electron microscopy and surfactant studies. Brit J Anaesth 49:965–977, 1977
Rashad K, Nilson K, Hunt HH Jr, Graff TD, Benson DW: Effect of humidification of anesthetic gases on static compliance. Anesth Analg 46:127–133, 1967
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kugimiya, T., Phuc, T.G. & Numata, K. Laboratory evaluation of heat-and-moisture exchangers. J Anesth 3, 80–85 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054090030080
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054090030080