Skip to main content
Log in

Hyperbaric hyperoxia suppresses growth of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains

  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. We investigated the effects of increased oxygen tension on the in vitro growth of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and Escherichia coli (E. coli).

Methods. The effects of oxygen tension [normobaric normoxia (21% O2 at 1 atm), normobaric hyperoxia (100% O2 at 1 atm), hyperbaric normoxia (21% O2 at 2 atm), and hyperbaric hyperoxia (100% O2 at 2 atm) on the in vitro growth of MRSA, MSSA, and E. coli were investigated by population analysis.

Results. Compared with normobaric normoxia, a 90-min exposure to hyperbaric hyperoxia significantly inhibited growth of both MRSA (by 25.0 ± 3.0%, mean ± SEM; P < 0.01) and MSSA (by 24.0 ± 3.3%; P < 0.01). Normobaric hyperoxia and hyperbaric normoxia were without effect. In contrast, the growth of E. coli was not affected by any of the above treatments.

Conclusion. Our results indicate that the bacterium S. aureus, including resistant strains, is susceptible to oxygen stress. The observation that relatively brief (90-min) treatment with hyperbaric hyperoxia is sufficient to produce significant growth inhibition suggests that hyperbaric hyperoxia may be useful in the treatment of serious staphylococcal infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: March 6, 2000 / Accepted: August 7, 2000

About this article

Cite this article

Tsuneyoshi, I., Boyle III, W., Kanmura, Y. et al. Hyperbaric hyperoxia suppresses growth of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains. J Anesth 15, 29–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005400170048

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005400170048

Navigation