Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Emergence agitation (EA) from general anesthesia has been reported as an adverse effect of sevoflurane in children. We describe a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the incidence of EA between children who underwent sevoflurane anesthesia and those who underwent propofol anesthesia.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria. Prospective randomized trials comparing sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in children less than 15 years of age were included in the meta-analysis. Data from each trial were combined using the random effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The heterogeneity of data was assessed by Cochran’s Q and I 2 tests. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for study quality, patient age, and type of surgical procedure.

Results

The meta-analysis included 14 studies, in which 560 patients received sevoflurane and 548 received propofol. The pooled OR for EA was 0.25 with a 95 % CI of 0.16–0.39 (P = 0.000), which indicates that propofol anesthesia resulted in a lower incidence of EA. The heterogeneity of data was not statistically supported (P = 0.191). All sensitivity analyses strengthened the evidence for the lower incidence of EA with propofol.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that EA in children is less likely to occur after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1138–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cravero J, Surgenor S, Whalen K. Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10:419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuratani N, Oi Y. Greater incidence of emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane anesthesia as compared with halothane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:225–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsen B, Seitz A, Larsen R. Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia: a comparison with desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:168–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000;320:1574–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang J, Chen L, White PF, Watcha MF, Wender RH, Naruse R, Kariger R, Sloninsky A. Recovery profile, costs, and patient satisfaction with propofol and sevoflurane for fast-track office-based anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:253–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kol IO, Egilmez H, Kaygusuz K, Gursoy S, Mimaroglu C. Open-label, prospective, randomized comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Clin Ther. 2008;30:175–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanna MG, Said HA. Comparison of two rapid recovery anaesthetic techniques using propofol versus sevoflurane in adjustable strabismus surgery. Egypt J Anaesth. 2004;20:59–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guard BC, Sikich N, Lerman J, Levine M. Maintenance and recovery characteristics after sevoflurane or propofol during ambulatory surgery in children with epidural blockade. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:1072–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopéz Gil ML, Brimacombe J, Clar B. Sevoflurane versus propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 1999;9:485–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gürkan Y, Kiliçkan L, Toker K. Propofol-nitrous oxide versus sevoflurane-nitrous oxide for strabismus surgery in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 1999;9:495–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Picard V, Dumont L, Pellegrini M. Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uezono S, Goto T, Terui K, Ichinose F, Ishguro Y, Nakata Y, Morita S. Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:563–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koçak ÖZ, Altunkan AA, Atici S, Cinel I, Oral U. Comparison of remifentanil-propofol and sevoflurane for preventing cardiovascular response and quality of recovery in paediatric otolaryngologic surgery. Turk J Med Sci. 2001;31:559–64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kubo S, Kinouchi K, Taniguchi A, Fukumitsu K, Kitamura S. Recovery characteristics of propofol anesthesia in pediatric outpatients; comparison with sevoflurane anesthesia. Masui. 2001;50:371–7 (in Japanese).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen IT, Finkel JC, Hannallah RS, Hummer KA, Patel KM. Rapid emergence does not explain agitation following sevoflurane anaesthesia in infants and children: a comparison with propofol. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13:63–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Auerswald K, Behrends K, Burkhardt U, Olthoff D. Propofol for paediatric patients in ear, nose and throat surgery. Practicability, quality and cost-effectiveness of different anaesthesia procedures for adenoidectomy in infants. Anaesthesist. 2006;55:846–53 (in German).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakayama S, Furukawa H, Yanai H. Propofol reduces the incidence of emergence agitation in preschool-aged children as well as in school-aged children: a comparison with sevoflurane. J Anesth. 2007;21:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bryan YF, Hoke LK, Taghon TA, Nick TG, Wang Y, Kennedy SM, Furstein JS, Kurth CD. A randomized trial comparing sevoflurane and propofol in children undergoing MRI scans. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:672–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. König MW, Varughese AM, Brennen KA, Barclay S, Shackleford TM, Samuels PJ, Gorman K, Ellis J, Wang Y, Nick TG. Quality of recovery from two types of general anesthesia for ambulatory dental surgery in children: a double-blind, randomized trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19:748–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deng XQ, Wang M, Ji Y. Clinical comparison of propofol and remifentanil anaesthesia with sevoflurane and remifentanil anaesthesia for children with cleft lip and palate repair surgery. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009;27:531–4 (in Chinese).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pieters BJ, Penn E, Nicklaus P, Bruegger D, Mehta B, Weatherly R. Emergence delirium and postoperative pain in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a comparison of propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:944–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, Sakima N, Parker SD, Fleisher LA. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:632–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Komatsu H, Taie S, Endo S, Fukuda K, Ueki M, Nogaya J, Ogli K. Electrical seizures during sevoflurane anesthesia in two pediatric patients with epilepsy. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1535–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Woodforth IJ, Hicks RG, Crawford MR, Stephen JP, Burke DJ. Electroencephalographic evidence of seizure activity under deep sevoflurane anesthesia in a nonepileptic patient. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1579–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:917–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dahmani S, Stany I, Brasher C, Lejeune C, Bruneau B, Wood C, Nivoche Y, Constant I, Murat I. Pharmacological prevention of sevoflurane- and desflurane-related emergence agitation in children: a meta-analysis of published studies. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:216–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Oh AY, Seo KS, Kim SD, Kim CS, Kim HS. Delayed emergence process does not result in a lower incidence of emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:297–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehta N, DeMunter C, Habibi P, Nadel S, Britto J. Short-term propofol infusions in children. Lancet. 1999;354:866–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kill C, Leonhardt A, Wulf H. Lactic acidosis after short-term infusion of propofol for anaesthesia in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta. Paediatr Anaesth. 2003;13:823–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Akihiro Kanaya, Norifumi Kuratani, Daizoh Satoh, and Shin Kurosawa reported no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan

    Akihiro Kanaya & Shin Kurosawa

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Tochigi, Japan

    Norifumi Kuratani

  3. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Postgraduate Medical School, Sendai, Japan

    Daizoh Satoh

Authors
  1. Akihiro Kanaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norifumi Kuratani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daizoh Satoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shin Kurosawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihiro Kanaya.

About this article

Cite this article

Kanaya, A., Kuratani, N., Satoh, D. et al. Lower incidence of emergence agitation in children after propofol anesthesia compared with sevoflurane: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth 28, 4–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1656-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1656-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation