Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of the timing principle with high-dose rocuronium during rapid sequence induction with lidocaine, remifentanil and propofol

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the timing principle with 1 mg kg−1 rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation. As secondary outcomes, propofol and lidocaine with or without remifentanil were examined to note their effects on the cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Methods

Thirty patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups of 15 patients each: a lidocaine-treated group (L) and a lidocaine/remifentanil-treated group (LR). Thirty seconds after lidocaine 1 mg kg−1 with or without infusion of remifentanil 1 μg kg−1 min−1, all patients received a bolus of rocuronium 1 mg kg−1. Shortly afterwards, patients were given propofol 2–2.5 mg kg−1. Intubating conditions and cardiovascular responses were observed 60 s after rocuronium. The time to spontaneous recovery of visible train-of-four (TOF) counts of 4 was observed at the thumb during 1.0–1.5% end-tidal sevoflurane and remifentanil anesthesia.

Results

All patients had excellent or good intubating conditions. Hypertension and tachycardia during laryngoscopy were well prevented in group LR, whereas they were significantly observed in group L. The times to reappearance of TOF counts of 4 were comparable in all groups [mean (SD); 63.6 (8.6) min in group L and 63.5 (11.6) min in group LR].

Conclusion

Application of the timing principle with 1 mg kg−1 rocuronium is beneficial for rapid tracheal intubation. Co-administered lidocaine, remifentanil and propofol can definitely suppress cardiovascular responses during laryngoscopy and intubation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Culling RD, Middaugh RE, Menk EJ. Rapid tracheal intubation with vecuronium: the timing principle. J Clin Anesth. 1989;1:422–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koh KF, Chen FG. Rapid tracheal intubation with atracurium: the timing principle. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:688–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng A, Smith G. Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anesthetic practice. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:494–513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Janda M, Scheeren TWL, Nöldge-Schomburg GFE. Management of pulmonary aspiration. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20:409–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson JM, Morell RC, Butterworth IVJF. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid-sequence induction using a variation of the timing principle. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:317–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sieber TJ, Zbinden AM, Curatolo M, Shorten GD. Tracheal intubation with rocuronium using the “timing principle”. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:1137–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkegaard-Nielsen H, Caldwell JE, Berry PD. Rapid tracheal intubation with rocuronium. A probability approach to determining dose. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrews JI, Kumar N, van den Brom RHG, Olkkola KT, Roest GJ, Wright PMC. A large simple randomized trial of rocuronium versus succinylcholine in rapid–sequence induction of anaesthesia along with propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43:4–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson JAH, Gillespie JA. Tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with propofol, alfentanil and i.v. lignocaine. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:163–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKeating K, Bali IM, Dundee JW. The effects of thiopentone and propofol on upper airway integrity. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:638–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barker P, Langton JA, Wilson IG, Smith G. Movements of the vocal cords on induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:23–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park HJ, Lee JR, Kim CS, Kim SD, Kim HS. Remifentanil halves the EC50 of propofol for successful insertion of the laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yazicioglu H, Muslu S, Yamak B, Erdemli O. Laryngeal mask airway insertion with remifentanil. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2005;56:171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’hara DA, Fragen RJ, Shanks CA. Comparison of visual and measured train-of-four recovery after vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade using two anaesthetic techniques. Br J Anaesth. 1986;58:1300–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim KS, Cheong MA, Lee HJ, Lee JM. Tactile assessment for the reversibility of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1080–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lowry DW, Mirakhur RK, McCarthy GJ, Carroll MT, McCourt KC. Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:936–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki T, Mizutani H, Miyake E, Fukano N, Saeki S, Ogawa S. Infusion requirements and reversibility of rocuronium at the corrugator supercilii and adductor pollicis muscles. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:1336–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Turan A, Memiş D, Karamanlioğlu B, Süt N, Pamukçu Z. The prevention of pain from injection of rocuronium by magnesium sulphate, lignocaine, sodium bicarbonate and alfentanil. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31:277–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abou-Madi MN, Keszler H, Yacoub JM. Cardiovascular reactions to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation following small and large intravenous doses of lidocaine. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1977;24:12–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tam S, Chung F, Campbell M. Intravenous lidocaine: optimal time of injection before tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:1036–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Albertin A, Casati A, Federica L, Roberto V, Travaglini V, Bergonzi P, Torri G. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during bispectral index-guided propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was performed using the institutional fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Suzuki.

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, T., Aono, M., Fukano, N. et al. Effectiveness of the timing principle with high-dose rocuronium during rapid sequence induction with lidocaine, remifentanil and propofol. J Anesth 24, 177–181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-0880-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-0880-y

Keywords

Navigation