Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The videolaryngoscope is less traumatic than the classic laryngoscope for a difficult airway in an obese patient

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report describes the anesthetic management of an obese patient with a difficult airway and the merits of videolaryngoscopy, specifically in terms of the reduced risk of dental damage during intubation. A 49-year-old woman (body mass index; BMI, 36 kg·m−2), was scheduled to undergo an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of cholelithiasis. Based upon the obesity of the patient and preoperative metrics (Mallampati grade IV; interdental distance of 2.9 cm; thyromental distance, 5.5 cm) a difficult airway was anticipated. Classic direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade size IV failed, despite three intubation attempts—each resulting in a Cormack-Lehane grade IV view. Intubation using a video-assisted Macintosh laryngoscope (V-Mac; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was successful upon the first attempt. The maximum force exerted on the patient’s maxillary incisors was 61 N by direct laryngoscopy and 7.6 N using the indirect videolaryngoscope, both using a Macintosh blade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:611–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, Brambrink A, Chhibber AK, Heidegger T, Lozada L, Ovassapian A, Parsons D, Ramsay J, Wilhelm W, Zwissler B, Gerig HJ, Hofstetter C, Karan S, Kreisler N, Pousman RM, Thierbach A, Wrobel M, Berci G. Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:357–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan MB, Ward D, Hagberg CA, Berci G, Hagiike M. Seeing is believing: the importance of video laryngoscopy in teaching and in managing the difficult airway. Surg Endosc. 2006;20Suppl 2:S479–S483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope—an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:307–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:1105–1111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Ngan Kee WD. A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1867–1878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai LD, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32:429–434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee RA, van Zundert AAJ, Maassen RLJG, Willems RJ, Beeke LP, Schaaper JN, van Dobbelsteen J, Wieringa PA. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:187–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJM, Brock-Utne JG, Saidman LJ, Levitan R. Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery: proper positioning is important for laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1841–1842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rich JM. Use of an elevation pillow to produce the head-elevated laryngoscopy position for airway management in morbidly obese and large-framed patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:264–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knill RL. Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a “BURP”. Can J Anesth. 1993;40:279–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, Akama Y, Nozaka T, Matsumoto H, Ogawa H. The efficacy of the “BURP” maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:419–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Zundert A, Stessel B, De Ruiter F, Giebelen D, Weber E. Video-assisted laryngoscopy: a useful adjunct in endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2007;58:129–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bucx MJ, Snijders CJ. Force, torque, and stress relaxation with direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1130–1131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bucx MJ, van der Vegt MH, Snijders CJ, Stijnen T, Wesselink PR. Transverse forces exerted on the maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43:665–671.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Suzuki A, Abe N, Sasakawa T, Kunisawa T, Takata O, Iwasaki H. Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) and Airtraq: big difference between two similar devices. J. Anesth. 2008;22:191–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Airway Scope: early clinical experience in 405 patients. J Anesth. 2008;22:81–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki A, Terao M, Aizawa K, Sasakawa T, Henderson JJ, Iwasaki H. Pentax-AWS Airway Scope as an alternative for awake flexible fiberoptic intubation of a morbidly obese patient in the semi-sitting position. J Anesth. 2009;23:162–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Snider DD, Clarke D, Finucane BT. The “BURP” maneuver worsens the glottic view when applied in combination with cricoid pressure. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:100–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, Akama Y, Nozaka T, Matsumoto H, Ogawa H. The efficacy of the “BURP” maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:419–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Givol N, Gershtansky Y, Halamish-Shani T, Taicher S, Perel A, Segal E. Perianesthetic dental injuries: analysis of incident reports. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16:173–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Warner ME, Benenfeld SM, Warner MA, Schroeder DR, Maxon PM. Perianesthetic dental injuries: frequency, outcomes, and risk factors. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1302–1305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Newland MC, Ellis SJ, Peters KR, Simonson JA, Durham TM, Ullrich FA, Tinker JH. Dental injury associated with anesthesia: a report of 161 687 anesthetics given over 14 years. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:339–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Maassen, R., Lee, R., van Zundert, A. et al. The videolaryngoscope is less traumatic than the classic laryngoscope for a difficult airway in an obese patient. J Anesth 23, 445–448 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-009-0780-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-009-0780-1

Key words

Navigation