Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lower intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway in the lateral and prone positions compared with that in the supine position

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the intracuff pressure (ICP) of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the lateral and prone positions with that in the supine position. One hundred and eight patients, weighing 50–70 kg, scheduled for elective orthopedic and plastic surgery, were assigned to three groups, based on their body position during surgery. General anesthesia was induced and then a size 4 deflated LMA was inserted in each patient in the supine (group 1; n = 42), lateral (group 2; n = 45), or prone position (group 3; n = 21). The LMA cuff was inflated with 15 ml of air. Anesthesia was maintained without nitrous oxide, and the ICP was measured until LMA removal in the supine position. ICP in groups 2 and 3 was significantly lower than that in group 1 from immediately after insertion to the end of surgery. After surgery, turning from the lateral (group 2) or prone (group 3) position to the supine position significantly raised the ICP. Because the ICP is related to the seal pressure of the LMA and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity, we recommend evaluating and adjusting the ICP appropriately in each body position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verghese C, Smith TG, Young E. Prospective survey of the use of the laryngeal mask airway in 2359 patients. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:58–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen CH, Lin CC, Tan PP. Clinical experience of laryngeal mask airway in lateral position during anesthesia (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1995;33:31–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS, Iatrou C, Brimacombe J. Flexible lightwand-guided intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway in the supine, right, and left lateral positions in healthy patients by experienced users. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:896–898.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng A, Raitt DG, Smith G. Induction of anesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in the prone position for minor surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1194–1198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brimacombe JR, Wenzel V, Keller C. The proseal laryngeal mask airway in prone patients: a retrospective audit of 245 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:222–225.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ono T, Otsuka R, Kuroda T, Honda E, Sasaki T. Effects of head and body position on two-and three-dimensional configurations of the upper airway. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1879–1884.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Litman RS, Wake N, Chan LM, McDonough JM, Sin S, Mahboubi S, Arens R. Effect of lateral positioning on upper airway size and morphology in sedated children. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:484–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pevernagie DA, Stanson AW, Sheedy PF 2nd, Daniels BK, Shepard JW Jr. Effects of body position on the upper airway of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:179–185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuzawa Y, Hayashi S, Yamaguchi S, Yoshikawa S, Okada K, Fujimoto K, Sekiguchi M. Effect of prone position on apnea severity in obstructive sleep apnea. Intern Med. 1995;34:1190–1193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Brimacombe N, Scully M, Barry J, Talbutt P, Sartain J, McMahon P. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Barry J, Mecklem D, Blinco A, Weidmann K. Emergence characteristics and post-operative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:338–343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller C, Puhringer F, Brimacombe JR. Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:186–187.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brimacombe J. Seal with the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts. In: Brimacombe J, editor. Laryngeal mask anesthesia: principles and practice. Philadeiphia: Saunders; 2005. p. 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brimacombe J, Berry A. Insertion of the laryngeal mask airway—a prospective study of four techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993;21:89–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lumb AB, Wrigley MW. The effect of nitrous oxide on laryngeal mask cuff pressure. In vitro and in vivo studies. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:320–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Does efficacy of seal and fibreoptic view change during anaesthesia with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of oxygen and oxygen-nitrous oxide gas mixtures. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:1258–1260.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brimacombe J. Anatomy. In: Brimacombe J, editor. Larygeal mask anesthesia: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005. p. 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83:480–482.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brimacombe J, Berry A. Laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure and position during anaesthesia lasting 1 to 2 hours. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:589–593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brimacombe JR. Positive pressure ventilation with the size 5 laryngeal mask. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:113–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Inagawa G, Okuda K, Miwa T, Hiroki K. Higher airway seal does not imply adequate positioning of laryngeal mask airways in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12:322–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Anesthesia, Kumamoto Kinoh Hospital, 6-8-1 Yamamuro, Kumamoto, 860-8518, Japan

    Toshiyuki Yano, Takashi Imaizumi, Chiho Uneda & Ryosuke Nakayama

Authors
  1. Toshiyuki Yano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Imaizumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chiho Uneda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ryosuke Nakayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Yano, T., Imaizumi, T., Uneda, C. et al. Lower intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway in the lateral and prone positions compared with that in the supine position. J Anesth 22, 312–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-008-0635-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-008-0635-1

Key words

Search

Navigation