Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in clinical practice: comparison between anti-tumour necrosis factor-naïve and non-naïve patients

  • Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 24 November 2016

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment is focused to achieve mucosal healing, avoiding disease progression. The study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) in UC and to identify predictors of remission to ADA.

Methods

This cohort study used data from the ENEIDA registry. Clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic remission, adverse events (AE), colectomy, and hospitalisations were evaluated; baseline characteristics and biological parameters were compared to determine predictors of response.

Results

We included 263 patients (87 naïve and 176 previously exposed to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha, TNF). After 12 weeks, clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission rates were 51, 26, and 14 %, respectively. The naïve group demonstrated better response to treatment than the anti-TNF-exposed group at short-term. Clinical and endoscopic remission within 1 year of treatment was better in the naïve group (65 vs. 49 and 50 vs. 35 %, respectively). The rates of AE, dose-escalation, hospitalisations, and colectomy during the first year were higher in anti-TNF-exposed patients (40, 43, and 27 % vs. 26, 21, and 11 %, respectively). Patients with primary failure and intolerance to the first anti-TNF and severe disease were associated with worse clinical response. Primary non-response to prior anti-TNF treatment and severe disease were predictive of poorer clinical remission. Low levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) at baseline were predictors of clinical remission.

Conclusions

In clinical practice, ADA was effective in UC, especially in anti-TNF naïve patients. FC and CRP could be predictors of treatment effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 November 2016

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

  1. Park SC, Jeen YT. Current and emerging biologics for ulcerative colitis. Gut Liver. 2015;9:18–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Seo GS, Chae SC. Biological therapy for ulcerative colitis: an update. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:13234–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tursi A, Penna A. Onset of ulcerative colitis under treatment with adalimumab. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2410–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barreiro-de Acosta M, Lorenzo A, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Adalimumab in ulcerative colitis: two cases of mucosal healing and clinical response at two years. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3814–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Laclotte C, Roblin X, et al. Adalimumab induction therapy for ulcerative colitis with intolerance or lost response to infliximab: an open-label study. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2328–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taxonera C, Estelles J, Fernandez-Blanco I, et al. Adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis previously treated with infliximab. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Afif W, Leighton JA, Hanauer SB, et al. Open-label study of adalimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis including those with prior loss of response or intolerance to infliximab. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gies N, Kroeker KI, Wong K, et al. Treatment of ulcerative colitis with adalimumab or infliximab: long-term follow-up of a single-centre cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:522–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Hommes DW, et al. Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2011;60:780–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandborn WJ, van Assche G, Reinisch W, et al. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:257–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Armuzzi A, Biancone L, Daperno M, et al. Adalimumab in active ulcerative colitis: a “real-life” observational study. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver. 2013;45:738–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott E, Murphy S, Keegan D, et al. Efficacy of Adalimumab as a long term maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:150–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Bosch O, Gisbert JP, Canas-Ventura A, et al. Observational study on the efficacy of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and predictors of outcome. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:717–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Danese S. Adalimumab in ulcerative colitis: ready for prime time. Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver. 2013;45:8–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dignass A, Eliakim R, Magro F, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 1: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2012;6:965–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie. 2005;19(Suppl A):5A–36A.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gisbert JP, Marin AC, McNicholl AG, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:613–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Armstrong BG, Sloan M. Ordinal regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129:191–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Suzuki Y, Motoya S, Hanai H, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:283–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma C, Panaccione R, Heitman SJ, et al. Systematic review: the short-term and long-term efficacy of adalimumab following discontinuation of infliximab. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:977–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guardiola J, Lobaton T, Rodriguez-Alonso L, et al. Fecal level of calprotectin identifies histologic inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical and endoscopic remission. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2014;12:1865–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Christensen KR, Steenholdt C, Brynskov J. Clinical outcome of adalimumab therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis previously treated with infliximab: a Danish single-center cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:1018–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen RD, Yu AP, Wu EQ, et al. Systematic review: the costs of ulcerative colitis in Western countries. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:693–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Busquets D, Aldeguer X. Clinical experience with adalimumab in anti-TNF-naive patients with ulcerative colitis. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:e195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moss AC, Brinks V, Carpenter JF. Review article: immunogenicity of anti-TNF biologics in IBD—the role of patient, product and prescriber factors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:1188–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma C, Huang V, Fedorak DK, et al. Outpatient ulcerative colitis primary anti-TNF responders receiving adalimumab or infliximab maintenance therapy have similar rates of secondary loss of response. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49:675–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Reinisch W. How to manage loss of response to anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease? Curr Drug Targets. 2010;11:152–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scrivo R, Conti F, Spinelli FR, et al. Switching between TNFalpha antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis: personal experience and review of the literature. Reumatismo. 2009;61:107–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sands BE. Biomarkers of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(1275–1285):e1272.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Soubieres AA, Poullis A. Emerging role of novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016;7:41–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Oussalah A, Laclotte C, Chevaux JB, et al. Long-term outcome of adalimumab therapy for ulcerative colitis with intolerance or lost response to infliximab: a single-centre experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:966–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Balint A, Farkas K, Palatka K, et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapy in routine clinical practice. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2016;10:26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hussey M, Mc Garrigle R, Kennedy U, et al. Long-term assessment of clinical response to adalimumab therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:217–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tursi A, Elisei W, Picchio M, et al. Effectiveness of adalimumab for ambulatory ulcerative colitis patients after failure of infliximab treatment: a first “real-life” experience in primary gastroenterology centers in Italy. Ann Gastroenterol Q Publ Hell Soc Gastroenterol. 2014;27:369–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors were involved in the acquisition of data and approval of the manuscript; Dr. Iborra was involved in the conception and design of the study, as well as the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; Drs. Iborra, Nos, and Pérez-Gisbert also oversaw the critical revision and incorporation of important intellectual content. Statistical assistance was provided by David Hervas, Unidad Bioestadística. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia. Editorial assistance (English language editing and formatting of the manuscript) was provided by Matt Weitz of Springer Healthcare Communications. This was funded by Abbvie ES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marisa Iborra.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest and source of funding

Dr. Gisbert has served as a speaker, a consultant and advisory member for or has received research funding from MSD, Abbvie, Hospira, Kern Pharma, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Ferring, Faes Farma, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Dr. Falk Pharma, Chiesi, Casen Fleet, Gebro Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Vifor Pharma. Dr. García-Sánchez has served as a speaker, a consultant and advisory member for MSD and Abbvie. Dr. López-Sanromán has served as a speaker, a consultant and advisory member for MSD and Abbvie. Dr. Jordi Guardiola has received grant support from Abbvie, MSD, and GE, advisory board fees from Abbvie, Ferring, Gebro Pharma and Kern Pharma, lecture fees from Abbvie, MSD, GE, Ferring, Shire, Gebro Pharma, Thermo Fisher and Tillots. Dr. Cabriada has served as a speaker for MSD, Abbvie and Otsuka. Dr. Nos has served as a speaker for MSD, Abbvie, and Ferring. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This work was not supported by any funding.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1293-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iborra, M., Pérez-Gisbert, J., Bosca-Watts, M.M. et al. Effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in clinical practice: comparison between anti-tumour necrosis factor-naïve and non-naïve patients. J Gastroenterol 52, 788–799 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1274-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1274-1

Keywords

Navigation