Skip to main content
Log in

Expanding endoscopic interventions for pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recently, several endoscopists have described the usefulness of the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided, single transluminal gateway technique (SGT) using transmural placement of single or multiple plastic stents or metal stents for a pancreatic pseudocyst (PC) and walled-off necrosis (WON). Moreover, the uses of the multiple transluminal gateway technique (MTGT) and single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainages (SGTMD) for complicated pancreatic walled-off necrosis have recently been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the feasibility and efficacy of endotherapy for the treatment of complicated PC and WON cases.

Methods

Eighty-nine patients with a PC (n = 14) and WON (n = 75) were treated under EUS guidance.

Results

In a total of 89 cases using SGT in combination with MTGT or SGTMD, the present study showed a technical success rate of 100 %, a final clinical success rate of 97.8 %, an adverse event during procedure rate of 0 %, an early adverse event rate of 12.4 %, and a mortality rate of 2.2 %.

Conclusions

Even complicated WON cases can be treated using combination endotherapies, although a surgical approach as well as a percutaneous approach should be considered in the cases refractory to endoscopic therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasonography

SEMS:

Self-expandable metal stent

PCD:

Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage

DEN:

Direct endoscopic necrosectomy

SGT:

Single transluminal gateway technique

MTGT:

Multiple transluminal gateway technique

SGTMD:

Single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainages

ERP:

Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography

PC:

Pancreatic pseudocyst

WON:

Walled-off necrosis

AE:

Adverse event

References

  1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vosoghi M, Sial S, Garrett B, et al. EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: review and experience at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. MedGenMed 2002;18:4(3):2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Walter A, et al. Transpapillary and transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:219–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giovannini M, Bernardini D, Seitz JF. Cystogastrostomy entirely performed under endosonography guidance for pancreatic pseudocyst: results in six patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:200–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park DH, Lee SS, Moon SH, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2009;41:842–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1102–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baron TH, Harewood GC, Morgan DE, et al. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:7–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron TH, Thaggard WG, Morgan DE, et al. Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology. 1996;111:755–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baron TH, Kozarek RA. Endotherapy for organized pancreatic necrosis: perspectives after 20 years. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1202–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, et al. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:92–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varadarajulu S, Phadnis M, Christein J, et al. Multiple transluminal gateway technique for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic wall-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukai S, Itoi T, Sofuni A, et al. Novel single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainages after EUS-guided drainage for complicated multilocular walled-off necrosis (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.004 (Epub ahead of print).

  13. Seifert H, Werhmann T, Schmit T, et al. Retroperitoneal endoscopic debridement for infected pancreatic necrosis. Lancet. 2000;356:653–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Seifert H, et al. Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut. 2009;58:1260–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardner TB, et al. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter U.S. series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:718–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yasuda I, et al. Japanese multicenter experience of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: The JENIPaN study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:627–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1491–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross A, Gluck M, Irani S, et al. Combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:79–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison S, Kakade M, Vaadaarjulu S, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing debridement of pancreatic necrosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Warner EA, Ben-David K, Cendan JC, et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: What now and what next? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2009;11:128–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van Brunschot S, et al. Endoscopic transgastric vs surgical necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;10:1053–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Itoi T, Yasuda I, Kurihara K, Itokawa F, Kasuya K. Technique of EUS-guided pancreatic duct intervention (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013 (in press).

  23. Itoi T, Kasuya K, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Yasuda I, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Moriyasu F. Ultrasonography-guided pancreatic duct access: technique and literature review of pancreatography, transmural drainage and rendezvous techniques. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:241–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ch Yu S, Hg Lo R, Kan PS, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: treatment with needle aspiration. Clin Radiol 1997;52:912–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sofuni A, Itoi T, Itokawa F, et al. New advances in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for pancreatic disease-usefulness of the new generation contrast agent and contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic imaging method. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res. 2012;1:233–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Maya Vardaman and Associate Professor Edward Barroga of the Department of International Medical Communications of Tokyo Medical University for the editorial review of the English manuscript. We are grateful to Dr. Todd. H. Baron of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, for his valuable editing suggestions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuntaro Mukai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukai, S., Itoi, T., Sofuni, A. et al. Expanding endoscopic interventions for pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis. J Gastroenterol 50, 211–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-014-0957-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-014-0957-8

Keywords

Navigation