Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of colorectal cancer morphology in relation to sex, age, location, and family history

  • Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies of colorectal cancer (CRC) have suggested different mechanisms of carcinogenesis in men and women, young and old patients, right- and left sided tumors, and sporadic and familial tumors. These differences might be reflected in morphology.

Methods

CRCs from 1613 patients operated on in 2004–2006 in Sweden were histologically reviewed. Morphology was examined in relation to sex, age groups, location, and family history.

Results

Tumors in the right colon were larger, of higher stage, more often poorly differentiated, more mucin-producing, more often had a peritumoral lymphocytic infiltrate and a high level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and more seldom had an infiltrating margin than tumors in the left colon and rectum (p < 0.0001 for most features). Young patients (<60 years) more seldom had multiple tumors but more often had perineural invasion, an infiltrative tumor margin, and high-stage tumors. Three features, TILs, medullary tumors, and invasive tumor margin, were related to sex. Only vascular invasion was related to familiality.

Conclusion

Location is the factor that has the most influence on tumor morphology. The results support the idea that different carcinogenic mechanisms may be involved in the right and left colon. Age is the most important determinant for the presence of multiple tumors and is a crucial factor for the aggressiveness of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George B, Kopetz S. Predictive and prognostic markers in colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 [Epub ahead of print].

  2. Woods SE, Narayanan K, Engel A. The influence of gender on colon cancer stage. J Womens Health. 2005;14:502–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koo JH, Jalaludin B, Wong SK, Kneebone A, Connor SJ, Leong RW. Improved survival in young women with colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;6:1488–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods SE, Basho S, Engel AJ. The influence of gender on colorectal cancer stage: the state of Ohio, 1996–2001. J Womens Health. 2006;15:877–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fairley TL, Cardinez CJ, Martin J, Alley L, Friedman C, Edwards B, et al. Colorectal cancer in U.S. adults younger than 50 years of age, 1998–2001. Cancer. 2006;107:1153–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heys SD, Sherif A, Bagley JS, Brittenden J, Smart C, Eremin O. Prognostic factors and survival of patients aged less than 45 years with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1994;81:685–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Snaebjornsson P, Jonasson L, Jonsson T, Möller PH, Theodors A, Jonasson JG. Colon cancer in Iceland—a nationwide comparative study on various pathology parameters with respect to right and left tumor location and patients’ age. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2645–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nawa T, Kato J, Kawamoto H, Okada H, Yamamoto H, Kohno H, et al. Difference in right- and left-sided colon cancer in patient characteristics, cancer morphology and histology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:418–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meguid RA, Slidell MB, Wolfgang CL, Wolfgang CL, Chang DC, Ahuja N. Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2388–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levi F, Randimbison L, La Vecchia C. Trends in subsite distribution of colorectal cancers and polyps from the Vaud Cancer Registry. Cancer. 1993;72:46–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Obrand DI, Gordon PH. Continued change in the distribution of colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1998;85:246–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grady WM. Genetic testing for high-risk colon cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1574–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindblom A, Ghazi S, Liu T, Lagerstedt K, Papadogiannakis N. Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); definition and diagnostics in 2005. Research Trends. 2006;2:21–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fink D, Aebi S, Howell SB. The role of DNA mismatch repair in drug resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4:1–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ward R, Meagher A, Tomlinson I, O’Connor T, Norrie M, Wu R, et al. Microsatellite instability and the clinicopathological features of sporadic colorectal cancer. Gut. 2001;48:821–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Khan PM, Lynch HT. The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:424–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghazi S, von Holst S, Picelli S, Lindforss U, Tenesa A, Farrington SM, et al. Colorectal cancer susceptibility loci in a population-based study: associations with morphological parameters. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:2688–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wittekind C, Greene FL, Hutter RV, Sobin LH, Klimpfinger M. TNM atlas. 5th ed. Paris: Springer; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. World Health Organization classification of tumors, pathology and genetics of tumors of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chandler I, Houlston RS. Interobserver agreement in grading colorectal cancers–findings from a nationwide web-based survey of histopathologists. Histopathology. 2008;52:494–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Young J, Simms LA, Biden KG, Wynter C, Whitehall V, Karamatic R, et al. Features of colorectal cancers with high-level microsatellite instability occurring in familial and sporadic settings: parallel pathways of tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:2107–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smyrk TC, Watson P, Kaul K, Lynch HT. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are a marker for microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;91:2417–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jass JR. Role of the pathologist in the diagnosis of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Dis Marker. 2004;20:215–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ueno H, Murphy J, Jass JR, Mochizuki H, Talbot IC. Tumor “budding” as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. Histopathology. 2002;40:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jass JR, Ajioka Y, Allen JP, Chan YF, Cohen RJ, Nixon JM, et al. Assessment of invasive growth pattern and lymphocytic infiltration in colorectal cancer. Histopathology. 1996;28:543–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Samowitz WS, Curtin K, Ma KN, Schaffer D, Coleman LW, Leppert M, et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic colon cancer is associated with an improved prognosis at the population level. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;9:917–23.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wong NA, Malcomson RD, Jodrell DI, Groome NP, Harrison DJ, Saunders PT. ERbeta isoform expression in colorectal carcinoma: an in vivo and in vitro study of clinicopathological and molecular correlates. J Pathol. 2005;207:53–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Breivik J, Lothe RA, Meling GI, Meling GI, Rognum TO, Børresen-Dale AL, et al. Different genetic pathways to proximal and distal colorectal cancer influenced by sex-related factors. Int J Cancer. 1997;74:664–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Slattery ML, Potter JD, Curtin K, Edwards S, Ma KN, Anderson K, et al. Estrogen reduces and withdrawal of estrogens increase risk of microsatellite instability-positive colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61:126–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Börger ME, Gosens MJEM, Jeuken JWM, van Kempen LC, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, et al. Signet ring cell differentiation in mucinous colorectal carcinoma. J Pathol. 2007;212:278–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gopalan V, Smith RA, Ho YH, Lam AK. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of colorectum–current perspectives and molecular biology. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li F-Y, Lai M-D. Colorectal cancer, one entity or three. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009;10:219–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Compton CC. Colorectal carcinoma: diagnostic, prognostic, and molecular features. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:376–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Horn A, Dahl O, Morild I. Venous and neural invasion as predictors of recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:798–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee YT. Local and regional recurrence of carcinoma of the colon and rectum: tumour-host factors and adjuvant therapy. Surg Oncol. 1995;4:283–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harrison JC, Dean PJ, el-Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R. From Dukes through Jass: pathological prognostic indicators in rectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 1994;25:498–505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Heys SD, O’Hanrahan TJ, Brittenden J, Eremin O. Colorectal cancers in young patients: a review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1994;3:225–31.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Newland RC, Dent OF, Lyttle MN, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL. Pathologic determinants of survival associated with colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases. A multivariate analysis of 579 patients. Cancer. 1994;73:2076–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Michelassi F, Ayala JJ, Balestracci T, Goldberg R, Chappell R, Block GE. Verification of a new clinicopathologic staging system for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1991;214:11–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Takebayashi Y, Akiyama SI, Yamada K, Akiba S, Aikou T. Angiogenesis as an unfavorable prognostic factor in human colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;78:226–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Compton CC, Fielding L, Burgart LJ. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;124:979–94.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sternberg A, Amar A, Alfici R, Groisman G. Conclusions from a study of venous invasion in stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Blenkinsopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP. Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1981;34:509–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zlobec I, Höller S, Tornillo L, Terracciano L, Lugli A. Combined histomorphologic and immunohistochemical phenotype to predict the presence of vascular invasion in colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1114–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lin M, Lin H-Z, Ma S-P, Ji P, Xie D, Yu JX. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A and -C: expression and correlations with lymphatic metastases and prognosis in colorectal cancer. Med Oncol. 2011;28:151–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lagerstedt Robinson K, Liu T, Vandrovcova J, Halvarsson B, Clendenning M, Frebourg T, et al. Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) diagnostics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:291–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Olsson L, Lindblom A. Family history of colorectal cancer in a Swedish county. Fam Cancer. 2003;2:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ueno H, Jones AM, Wilkinson KH, Jass JR, Talbot IC. Histological categorization of fibrotic cancer stroma in advanced rectal cancer. Gut. 2004;53:581–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all patients and their spouses. We also thank Berith Wejderot for excellent technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Ghazi.

Additional information

The members of The Low-Risk Colorectal Cancer Study Group are listed in the Appendix.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Table 1 (DOC 73 kb)

Supplementary Table 2 (DOC 51 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

The members of the Low-Risk Colorectal Cancer Study Group are: David Edler, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset/Solna (Stockholm); Claes Lenander, Mag-tarm-centrum, Ersta sjukhus (Stockholm); Johan Dalén, S:t Görans sjukhus (Stockholm); Fredrik Hjern, Danderyds sjukhus (Danderyd); Nils Lundqvist, Norrtälje sjukhus (Norrtälje); Ulrik Lindforss, Södertälje sjukhus (Södertälje); Lars Påhlman, Akademiska sjukhuset (Uppsala); Kennet Smedh, Centrallasarettet (Västerås); Anders Törnqvist, Centralsjukhuset (Karlstad); Jörn Holm, Länssjukhuset Gävle-Sandviken (Gävle); Martin Janson, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset/Huddinge (Huddinge); Magnus Andersson, Universitetssjukhuset (Örebro); Susanne Ekelund, Södersjukhuset (Stockholm); and Louise Olsson, Mälarsjukhuset (Eskilstuna).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghazi, S., Lindforss, U., Lindberg, G. et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer morphology in relation to sex, age, location, and family history. J Gastroenterol 47, 619–634 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0520-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0520-9

Keywords

Navigation