Abstract
Background/purpose
A discrepancy between the actually obtained graft weight and the preoperative volumetric estimation is often observed in living donor liver transplantation. The aim of the study reported here was to clarify the prevalence and degree of this discrepancy between estimated and actual liver volume.
Materials and methods
Preoperative volumetric evaluations of 26 live donor livers were performed using three-dimensional computed tomography software. The weight of the liver graft and blood contained in the graft were measured immediately after procurement and compared with the preoperative estimate. The graft was also weighed after perfusion and after back-table procedures.
Results
Analysis of the results revealed that blood-free graft weight was significantly overestimated (p = 0.02) and blood weight was significantly underestimated (p < 0.001). The sum of the weight of the graft and blood best corresponded to the preoperative volume estimate (R 2 = 0.64, p < 0.001). The back-table procedures significantly decreased the weight of the liver graft (p < 0.001). Graft weight after perfusion and after venous reconstruction corresponded to 95 and 90% of the weight obtained before perfusion, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that donor age had the most significant influence on the ratio of the weight decrease in the University of Wisconsin solution (p = 0.03).
Conclusions
The weight of liver grafts decreases significantly during back-table procedures. Underestimation of the blood weight contained in the graft is one cause of the graft weight discrepancy, but weight loss while the graft was immersed in the University of Wisconsin solution was also observed. These phenomena should be taken into account when graft size is being determined.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- LDLT:
-
Living donor liver transplantation
- UW:
-
University of Wisconsin
References
Lo C, Fan S, Chan J, Wei W, Lo R, Lai C. Minimum graft volume for successful adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure. Transplantation. 1996;62:696–8.
Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami T, Chisuwa H, et al. Preoperative measurement of segmental liver volume of donors for living related liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1993;18:1115–20.
Sakamoto S, Uemoto S, Uryuhara K, Kim Id, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, et al. Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor liver transplantation using right lobe. Transplantation. 2001;71:1407–13.
Kamel I, Kruskal J, Warmbrand G, Goldberg S, Pomfret E, Raptopoulos V. Accuracy of volumetric measurements after virtual right hepatectomy in potential donors undergoing living adult liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:483–7.
Hiroshige S, Shimada M, Harada N, Shiotani S, Ninomiya M, Minagawa R, et al. Accurate preoperative estimation of liver-graft volumetry using three-dimensional computed tomography. Transplantation. 2003;75:1561–4.
Frericks B, Caldarone F, Nashan B, Savellano D, Stamm G, Kirchhoff T, et al. 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:326–33.
Yonemura Y, Taketomi A, Soejima Y, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Gion T, et al. Validity of preoperative volumetric analysis of congestion volume in living donor liver transplantation using three-dimensional computed tomography. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1556–62.
Taniguchi M, Furukawa H, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Oota M, Onodera Y, et al. Hepatic venous reconstruction of anterior sector using three-dimensional helical computed tomography in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;81:797–9.
Nakayama Y, Li Q, Katsuragawa S, Ikeda R, Hiai Y, Awai K, et al. Automated hepatic volumetry for living related liver transplantation at multisection CT. Radiology. 2006;240:743–8.
Itamoto T, Emoto K, Mitsuta H, Fukuda S, Ohdan H, Tashiro H, et al. Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19:177–83.
Satou S, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Kishi Y, Kaneko J, Matsui Y, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography for planning donor hepatectomy. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:145–9.
Radtke A, Sotiropoulos G, Nadalin S, Molmenti E, Schroeder T, Lang H, et al. Preoperative volume prediction in adult living donor liver transplantation: how much can we rely on it? Am J Transplant. 2007;7:672–9.
Liu B, Yan L, Wang W, Li B, Zeng Y, Wen T, et al. Clinical study on safety of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in both donors and recipients. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:955–9.
Imura S, Shimada M, Miyake K, Ikemoto T, Morine Y, Yoshizumi T. A new technique to acquire additional liver volume for left lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1206–10.
Kayashima H, Taketomi A, Yonemura Y, Ijichi H, Harada N, Yoshizumi T, et al. Accuracy of an age-adjusted formula in assessing the graft volume in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:1366–71.
Hwang S, Lee S, Kim K, Park K, Ahn C, Moon D, et al. Correlation of blood-free graft weight and volumetric graft volume by an analysis of blood content in living donor liver grafts. Transplant Proc. 2002;34:3293–4.
Marcos A, Orloff M, Mieles L, Olzinski A, Renz J, Sitzmann J. Functional venous anatomy for right-lobe grafting and techniques to optimize outflow. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:845–52.
Lemke A, Brinkmann M, Schott T, Niehues S, Settmacher U, Neuhaus P, et al. Living donor right liver lobes: preoperative CT volumetric measurement for calculation of intraoperative weight and volume. Radiology. 2006;240:736–42.
Van Thiel D, Hagler N, Schade R, Skolnick M, Heyl A, Rosenblum E, et al. In vivo hepatic volume determination using sonography and computed tomography Validation and a comparison of the two techniques. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:1812–7.
Kokudo N, Sugawara Y, Imamura H, Sano K, Makuuchi M. Tailoring the type of donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1694–703.
Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Sano K, Imamura H, Kaneko J, Ohkubo T, et al. Vein reconstruction in modified right liver graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2003;237:180–5.
Takemura N, Sugawara Y, Hashimoto T, Akamatsu N, Kishi Y, Tamura S, et al. New hepatic vein reconstruction in left liver graft. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:356–60.
Kishi Y, Sugawara Y, Matsui Y, Akamatsu N, Motomura N, Takamoto S, et al. Alternatives to the double vena cava method in partial liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:101–3.
Heinemann A, Wischhusen F, Püschel K, Rogiers X. Standard liver volume in the Caucasian population. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999;5:366–8.
Emiroglu R, Coskun M, Yilmaz U, Sevmis S, Ozcay F, Haberal M. Safety of multidetector computed tomography in calculating liver volume for living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:3576–8.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science of Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Satou, S., Sugawara, Y., Tamura, S. et al. Discrepancy between estimated and actual weight of partial liver graft from living donors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18, 586–591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0374-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0374-9