Skip to main content
Log in

Discrepancy between estimated and actual weight of partial liver graft from living donors

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

Abstract

Background/purpose

A discrepancy between the actually obtained graft weight and the preoperative volumetric estimation is often observed in living donor liver transplantation. The aim of the study reported here was to clarify the prevalence and degree of this discrepancy between estimated and actual liver volume.

Materials and methods

Preoperative volumetric evaluations of 26 live donor livers were performed using three-dimensional computed tomography software. The weight of the liver graft and blood contained in the graft were measured immediately after procurement and compared with the preoperative estimate. The graft was also weighed after perfusion and after back-table procedures.

Results

Analysis of the results revealed that blood-free graft weight was significantly overestimated (p = 0.02) and blood weight was significantly underestimated (p < 0.001). The sum of the weight of the graft and blood best corresponded to the preoperative volume estimate (R 2 = 0.64, p < 0.001). The back-table procedures significantly decreased the weight of the liver graft (p < 0.001). Graft weight after perfusion and after venous reconstruction corresponded to 95 and 90% of the weight obtained before perfusion, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that donor age had the most significant influence on the ratio of the weight decrease in the University of Wisconsin solution (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

The weight of liver grafts decreases significantly during back-table procedures. Underestimation of the blood weight contained in the graft is one cause of the graft weight discrepancy, but weight loss while the graft was immersed in the University of Wisconsin solution was also observed. These phenomena should be taken into account when graft size is being determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

3D:

Three-dimensional

LDLT:

Living donor liver transplantation

UW:

University of Wisconsin

References

  1. Lo C, Fan S, Chan J, Wei W, Lo R, Lai C. Minimum graft volume for successful adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure. Transplantation. 1996;62:696–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami T, Chisuwa H, et al. Preoperative measurement of segmental liver volume of donors for living related liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1993;18:1115–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakamoto S, Uemoto S, Uryuhara K, Kim Id, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, et al. Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor liver transplantation using right lobe. Transplantation. 2001;71:1407–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamel I, Kruskal J, Warmbrand G, Goldberg S, Pomfret E, Raptopoulos V. Accuracy of volumetric measurements after virtual right hepatectomy in potential donors undergoing living adult liver transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:483–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiroshige S, Shimada M, Harada N, Shiotani S, Ninomiya M, Minagawa R, et al. Accurate preoperative estimation of liver-graft volumetry using three-dimensional computed tomography. Transplantation. 2003;75:1561–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frericks B, Caldarone F, Nashan B, Savellano D, Stamm G, Kirchhoff T, et al. 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:326–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yonemura Y, Taketomi A, Soejima Y, Yoshizumi T, Uchiyama H, Gion T, et al. Validity of preoperative volumetric analysis of congestion volume in living donor liver transplantation using three-dimensional computed tomography. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1556–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taniguchi M, Furukawa H, Shimamura T, Suzuki T, Oota M, Onodera Y, et al. Hepatic venous reconstruction of anterior sector using three-dimensional helical computed tomography in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;81:797–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakayama Y, Li Q, Katsuragawa S, Ikeda R, Hiai Y, Awai K, et al. Automated hepatic volumetry for living related liver transplantation at multisection CT. Radiology. 2006;240:743–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Itamoto T, Emoto K, Mitsuta H, Fukuda S, Ohdan H, Tashiro H, et al. Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2006;19:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Satou S, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Kishi Y, Kaneko J, Matsui Y, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography for planning donor hepatectomy. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Radtke A, Sotiropoulos G, Nadalin S, Molmenti E, Schroeder T, Lang H, et al. Preoperative volume prediction in adult living donor liver transplantation: how much can we rely on it? Am J Transplant. 2007;7:672–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu B, Yan L, Wang W, Li B, Zeng Y, Wen T, et al. Clinical study on safety of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in both donors and recipients. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:955–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Imura S, Shimada M, Miyake K, Ikemoto T, Morine Y, Yoshizumi T. A new technique to acquire additional liver volume for left lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1206–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kayashima H, Taketomi A, Yonemura Y, Ijichi H, Harada N, Yoshizumi T, et al. Accuracy of an age-adjusted formula in assessing the graft volume in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:1366–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang S, Lee S, Kim K, Park K, Ahn C, Moon D, et al. Correlation of blood-free graft weight and volumetric graft volume by an analysis of blood content in living donor liver grafts. Transplant Proc. 2002;34:3293–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcos A, Orloff M, Mieles L, Olzinski A, Renz J, Sitzmann J. Functional venous anatomy for right-lobe grafting and techniques to optimize outflow. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:845–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lemke A, Brinkmann M, Schott T, Niehues S, Settmacher U, Neuhaus P, et al. Living donor right liver lobes: preoperative CT volumetric measurement for calculation of intraoperative weight and volume. Radiology. 2006;240:736–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Thiel D, Hagler N, Schade R, Skolnick M, Heyl A, Rosenblum E, et al. In vivo hepatic volume determination using sonography and computed tomography Validation and a comparison of the two techniques. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:1812–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kokudo N, Sugawara Y, Imamura H, Sano K, Makuuchi M. Tailoring the type of donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:1694–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Sano K, Imamura H, Kaneko J, Ohkubo T, et al. Vein reconstruction in modified right liver graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 2003;237:180–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takemura N, Sugawara Y, Hashimoto T, Akamatsu N, Kishi Y, Tamura S, et al. New hepatic vein reconstruction in left liver graft. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:356–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kishi Y, Sugawara Y, Matsui Y, Akamatsu N, Motomura N, Takamoto S, et al. Alternatives to the double vena cava method in partial liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:101–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heinemann A, Wischhusen F, Püschel K, Rogiers X. Standard liver volume in the Caucasian population. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999;5:366–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Emiroglu R, Coskun M, Yilmaz U, Sevmis S, Ozcay F, Haberal M. Safety of multidetector computed tomography in calculating liver volume for living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:3576–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiko Sugawara.

About this article

Cite this article

Satou, S., Sugawara, Y., Tamura, S. et al. Discrepancy between estimated and actual weight of partial liver graft from living donors. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18, 586–591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0374-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0374-9

Keywords

Navigation