Skip to main content
Log in

Genome-wide microsatellite analysis of focal nodular hyperplasia: a strong tool for the differential diagnosis of non-neoplastic liver nodule from hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Allelic imbalance (AI), which represents certain chromosomal gains or losses, has been described in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the significance of AI analysis in focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) has not been fully clarified. We hypothesized, therefore, that comprehensive allelotyping of FNH could be a useful tool for differentiating FNH from HCC. A 27-year-old man was admitted to the hospital because of general fatigue. A computed tomography (CT) scan disclosed a hepatic nodule 8 cm in diameter. No definite diagnosis was made after imaging or by biopsy before surgery. Macroscopically and microscopically, the surgical specimen showed typical features of FNH. Comprehensive microsatellite analysis was carried out with 382 microsatellite markers distributed throughout all chromosomes. To detect AI effectively, the cutoff value of the AI index was set at 0.70. Among the 382 microsatellite markers, 212 loci were informative, but no AI was detected. The absence of gross chromosomal alterations strongly suggested that the large nodule was FNH rather than HCC, in terms of its genetic background. The patient's subsequent clinical course revealed the nodule to be benign. The results suggest that this genome-wide microsatellite analysis is a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of non-neoplastic liver nodules from HCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BN Nguyen JF Flejou B Terris J Belghiti C Degott (1999) ArticleTitleFocal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. A comprehensive pathologic study of 305 lesions and recognition of new histologic forms Am J Surg Pathol 23 1441–54 Occurrence Handle10584697 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFeqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000478-199912000-00001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T Nishimura N Nishida T Itoh M Kuno M Minata T Komeda et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComprehensive allelotyping of well-differentiated human hepatocellular carcinoma with semiquantitative determination of chromosomal gain or loss Genes Chromosom Cancer 35 329–39 Occurrence Handle12378527 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XptVGisrk%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/gcc.10126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. T Nishimura N Nishida T Komeda Y Fukuda K Nakao (2005) ArticleTitleGenotype stability and clonal evolution of hepatocellular carcinoma assessed by autopsy-based genome-wide microsatellite analysis Cancer Genet Cytogenet 161 164–9 Occurrence Handle16102588 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXos1Wrtrg%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2005.02.011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G Wang Y Zhao X Liu L Wang C Wu W Zhang et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAllelic loss and gain, but not genomic instability, as the major somatic mutation in primary hepatocellular carcinoma Genes Chromosom Cancer 31 221–7 Occurrence Handle11391792 Occurrence Handle10.1002/gcc.1138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. F Niketeghad HJ Decker WH Caselmann P Lund F Geissler HP Dienes et al. (2001) ArticleTitleFrequent genomic imbalances suggest commonly altered tumour genes in human hepatocarcinogenesis Br J Cancer 85 697–704 Occurrence Handle11531255 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXns1yktrw%3D Occurrence Handle10.1054/bjoc.2001.1963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K Shiraishi K Okita N Kusano T Harada S Kondoh S Okita et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA comparison of DNA copy number changes detected by comparative genomic hybridization in malignancies of the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas Oncology 60 151–61 Occurrence Handle11244331 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXit1ekt7g%3D Occurrence Handle10.1159/000055313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. F Canzian R Salovaara A Hemminki P Kristo PB Chadwick LA Aaltonen et al. (1996) ArticleTitleSemiautomated assessment of loss of heterozygosity and relationship error in tumors Cancer Res 56 3331–7 Occurrence Handle8764130 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28Xktlaqt7k%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. IR Wanless C Mawdsley R Adams (1985) ArticleTitleOn the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver Hepatology 5 1194–200 Occurrence Handle4065824 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD2MjktlM%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D Cherqui A Rahmouni F Charlotte H Boulahdour JM Metreau M Meignan et al. (1995) ArticleTitleManagement of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma in young women: a series of 41 patients with clinical, radiological and pathology correlations Hepatology 22 1674–81 Occurrence Handle7489973 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD1cfot1U%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0270-9139(95)90190-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. YJ Chen PJ Chen MC Lee SH Yeh MT Hsu CH Lin (2002) ArticleTitleChromosomal analysis of hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia by comparative genomic hybridization Genes Chromosom Cancer 35 138–43 Occurrence Handle12203777 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XntVyjt7g%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/gcc.10103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nakayama, S., Kanbara, Y., Nishimura, T. et al. Genome-wide microsatellite analysis of focal nodular hyperplasia: a strong tool for the differential diagnosis of non-neoplastic liver nodule from hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13, 416–420 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1090-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1090-8

Key words

Navigation