Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic gastric bypass for gastric outlet obstruction is associated with smoother, faster recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery

  • Original articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Laparoscopic gastric bypass for relief of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is feasible and safe. However, comparative data to confirm the benefits of the laparoscopic approach remain scarce.

Methods

Between 1998 and 2003, 26 patients underwent 15 laparoscopic (surgeon A) and 12 open (surgeon B) gastrojejunostomies (GJs) for GOO. The indications for surgery included malignant (n = 17) and benign (n = 10) diseases.

Results

There were no conversions to open surgery in the laparoscopic group, and no operative mortality occurred in either group. The groups were comparable for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, frequencies of previous abdominal surgery and of malignant or benign disease, and type of GJ fashioned. There were no differences between the laparoscopic and open groups with regard to the operating time (median, 90 vs 111 min; P = 0.113), and patients receiving intraoperative blood transfusion. However, laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly shorter durations of postoperative intravenous hydration (60 vs 234 h; P = 0.001), opiate analgesia (49 vs 128 h; P = 0.025), and hospital stay (3 vs 15 days; P = 0.005). Operative morbidity occurred more frequently following open surgery (33% vs 13%; P = 0.219).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic GJ for the relief of GOO is associated with a smoother and more rapid postoperative recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. In experienced hands, the laparoscopic approach to GJ should become the new gold standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. YM Shyr CH Su CW Wu WY Lui (2000) ArticleTitleProspective study of gastric outlet obstruction in unresectable periampullary adenocarcinoma World J Surg 24 60–5 Occurrence Handle10594205 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689910012 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FmtlersQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A Watanabe Y Maehara T Okuyama Y Kakeji D Korenaga K Sugimachi (1998) ArticleTitleGastric carcinoma with pyloric stenosis Surgery 123 330–4 Occurrence Handle9526526 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7oslaktg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. SP Misra M Dwivedi V Misra (1998) ArticleTitleMalignancy is the most common cause of gastric outlet obstruction even in a developing country Endoscopy 30 484–6 Occurrence Handle9693898 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czlvVyjsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M Rhodes L Nathanson G Fielding (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic biliary and gastric bypass: a useful adjunct in the treatment of carcinoma of the pancreas Gut 36 778–80 Occurrence Handle7541010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3Mjms1I%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. IB Brune H Feussner H Neuhaus M Classen JR Siewert (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic gastrojejunostomy and endoscopic biliary stent placement for palliation of incurable gastric outlet obstruction with cholestasis Surg Endosc 11 834–7 Occurrence Handle9266646 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900465 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3M7ntFU%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J Kuriansky A Saenz E Astudillo V Cardona L Fernandez-Cruz (2000) ArticleTitleSimultaneous laparoscopic biliary and retrocolic gastric bypass in patients with unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas Surg Endosc 14 179–81 Occurrence Handle10656956 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900095 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7isVWjsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. YB Choi (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for palliation of gastric outlet obstruction in unresectable gastric cancer Surg Endosc 16 1620–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. R Bergamaschi R Marvik JE Thoresen B Ystgaard G Johnsen HE Myrvold (1998) ArticleTitleOpen versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for palliation in advanced pancreatic cancer Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 92–6 Occurrence Handle9566559 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3is1aisw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. AS Ali BJ Ammori (2003) ArticleTitleConcomitant laparoscopic gastric and biliary bypass and bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnotomy: the full package of minimally invasive palliation for pancreatic cancer Surg Endosc 17 2028–31 Occurrence Handle14973750 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-003-4243-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FosVShug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. BJ Ammori (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic pancreas-preserving distal duodenectomy for duodenal stricture related to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) Surg Endosc 16 1362–3

    Google Scholar 

  11. BJ Ammori B Boreham (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic devine exclusion gastroenterostomy for the palliation of unresectable and obstructing gastric carcinoma Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12 353–5 Occurrence Handle12409703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. A Farooq R Patel N Sorefan BJ Ammori (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic exclusion gastroenterostomy for palliation of gastric outlet obstruction secondary to recurrent cholangiocarcinoma Hepatogastroenterology 51 1886–8 Occurrence Handle15532850 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crmtV2jsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S Laine A Rantala R Gullichsen J Ovaska (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs conventional Nissen fundoplication. A prospective randomized study Surg Endosc 11 441–4 Occurrence Handle9153171 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB1MfhvV0%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T Kiviluoto J Siren P Luukkonen E Kivilaakso (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis Lancet 351 321–5 Occurrence Handle9652612 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhsVOhsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. HI Hendolin ME Paakonen EM Alhava R Tarvainen T Kemppinen P Lahtinen (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response Eur J Surg 166 394–9 Occurrence Handle10881952 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FksVSitQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C Ottosen G Lingman L Ottosen (2000) ArticleTitleThree methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome BJOG 107 1380–5 Occurrence Handle11117766 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FmtlWktg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado A Castells P Taura JM Pique et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial Lancet 359 2224–9 Occurrence Handle12103285 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. KL Leung SP Kwok SC Lam JF Lee RY Yiu SS Ng et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial Lancet 363 1187–92 Occurrence Handle15081650 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A Donini U Baccarani G Terrosu V Corno A Ermacora A Pasqualucci et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs open splenectomy in the management of hematologic diseases Surg Endosc 13 1220–5 Occurrence Handle10594270 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fmtlemuw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C Franciosi R Caprotti F Romano G Porta G Real G Colombo et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a comparative study Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10 291–5 Occurrence Handle11083211 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-200010000-00006 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gtFGhsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. D Hazzan E Shiloni D Golijanin O Jurim D Gross P Reissman (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasm Surg Endosc 15 1356–8 Occurrence Handle11727150 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080052 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnotV2kuw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. T Mala B Edwin I Gladhaug E Fosse O Soreide A Bergan et al. (2002) ArticleTitleA comparative study of the short-term outcome following open and laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastases Surg Endosc 16 1059–63 Occurrence Handle12165823 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9176-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vhtFCqtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. NT Nguyen SL Lee C Goldman N Fleming A Arango R McFall et al. (2001) ArticleTitleComparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial J Am Coll Surg 192 469–77 Occurrence Handle11294404 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ivFSktg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. A Westling S Gustavsson (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective, randomized trial Obes Surg 11 284–92 Occurrence Handle11433902 Occurrence Handle10.1381/096089201321336610 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FhslSrsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. JA Lujan MD Frutos Q Hernandez R Liron JR Cuenca G Valero et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open gastric bypass in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized prospective study Ann Surg 239 433–7 Occurrence Handle15024302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. NT Nguyen HS Ho LS Palmer BM Wolfe (2000) ArticleTitleA comparison study of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity J Am Coll Surg 191 149–57 Occurrence Handle10945358 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgvFKitw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. A Courcoulas Y Perry P Buenaventura J Luketich (2003) ArticleTitleComparing the outcomes after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a matched paired analysis Obes Surg 13 341–6 Occurrence Handle12841890 Occurrence Handle10.1381/096089203765887624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. M Eccles Z Clapp J Grimshaw PC Adams B Higgins I Purves et al. (1996) ArticleTitleNorth of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development BMJ 321 760–2

    Google Scholar 

  29. R Razzaq HU Laasch R England A Marriott D Martin (2001) ArticleTitleExpandable metal stents for the palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24 313–8 Occurrence Handle11815836 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00270-001-0031-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FosFymtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. DG Adler TH Baron (2002) ArticleTitleEndoscopic palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction using self-expanding metal stents: experience in 36 patients Am J Gastroenterol 97 72–8 Occurrence Handle11808972 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05423.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. YT Wong DM Brams L Munson L Sanders F Heiss M Chase et al. (2002) ArticleTitleGastric outlet obstruction secondary to pancreatic cancer Surg Endosc 16 310–2 Occurrence Handle11967685 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9061-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jtVWqug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D Maosheng T Ohtsuka J Ohuchida K Inoue K Yokohata K Yamaguchi et al. (2001) ArticleTitleSurgical bypass versus metallic stent for unresectable pancreatic cancer J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8 367–73 Occurrence Handle11521183 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005340170010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvnslektQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. KD Lillemoe JL Cameron JM Hardacre TA Sohn PK Sauter J Coleman et al. (1999) ArticleTitleIs prophylactic gastrojejunostomy indicated for unresectable periampullary cancer? A prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 230 322–8 Occurrence Handle10493479 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvitFahsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. JY Jeong JK Han AY Kim KH Lee JY Lee JW Kang et al. (2002) ArticleTitleFluoroscopically guided placement of a covered self-expandable metallic stent for malignat antroduodenal obstructions: preliminary results in 18 patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 847–52 Occurrence Handle11906861

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. MJ Campbell D Machin (1997) The randomised controlled trial MJ Campbell D Machin (Eds) Medical statistics John Wiley & Sons Chichester 105–15

    Google Scholar 

  36. CB Terwee EJ Nieveen Van Dijkum DJ Gouma KE Bakkevold JH Klinkenbijl TP Wade et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePooling of prognostic studies in cancer of the pancreatic head and periampullary region: the Tiple-P study. Triple-P Study Group Eur J Surg 166 706–12 Occurrence Handle11034467 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvosFyjtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Rashedy, M., Dadibhai, M., Shareif, A. et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for gastric outlet obstruction is associated with smoother, faster recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12, 474–478 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-005-1013-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-005-1013-0

Key words

Navigation