Skip to main content
Log in

Locating center of gravity in geological contexts

  • Short note
  • Published:
International Journal of Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This short article at first deduces center of gravity (C.G.) for horizontal single-layered and multi-layered rock bodies. Spatial variation of density is also incorporated using geologically realistic density–depth linear and exponential algebraic relations. These are the two well-known depth-wise density variation patterns. The derivations are then extended for dipping rock bodies. Location of C.G. depends on the (i) dimension (length, width and thickness) and (ii) dip amount of the geological body, (iii) the densities of the solid matrix and the pore fluid of one or more than one layers, (iv) gradient of density change with depth and along other two perpendicular directions-for individual layers, and for sedimentary units (v) on the porosity at the surface and (vi) the compaction constant. This work would be useful in gravity- and isostatic studies, and in deciphering stabilities of crustal blocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Athy LF (1930) Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks. AAPG Bull 14:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock Y, Melgar D (2016) Physical applications of GPS geodesy: a review. Rep Prog Phys 79:106801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buryakovsky LA, Djevanshir RDj, Chilingar GV (1995) Abnormally-high formation pressures in Azerbaijan and the South Caspian Basin (as related to smectite—illite transformations during diagenesis and catagenesis). J Petrol Sci Eng 13:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das BC, Mukherjee BN (2012) Statics, 25th edn. U.N. Dhur & Sons, Kolkata, pp 1–374

  • de Blasio FV (2011) Introduction to the physics of landslides. (Lecture notes on the dynamics of mass wasting). Springer, Dordrecht, p 196

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denny M (2010) Super structures: the science of bridges, buildings, dams, and other feats of engineering. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p. 206

    Google Scholar 

  • Djomani YHP, O’Reilly SY, Griffin WL et al (2001) The density structure of subcontinental lithosphere through time. Earth Planet Sci Lett 184:605–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorbatsevich FF, Kovalevskiy MV, Trishina OM (2017) Density and velocity model of metamorphic rock properties in the upper, middle and lower crust in the geospace of Kola superdeep borehole (SG-3). Geophys Res Abs 19:EGU2017–2155

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes A (1945) Principles of physical geology. The Ronald Press Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurol Y (2016) The tectonics of structural systems: an architectural approach. Routledge, Abingdon, p 33

  • Hwang C, Hsiao Y-S (2003) Orthometric corrections from leveling, gravity, density and elevation data: a case study in Taiwan. J Geodesy 77:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi W, Smilde PL (2009) Gravity interpretation: fundamentals and application of gravity inversion and geological interpretation. Springer, Berlin, p 137

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerche I, O’Brien JJ (1987) Modelling of buoyant salt diapirism. In: Lerche I, O’Brien JJ (eds) Dynamical geology of salt and related structures. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 129–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maxant J (1975) Distribution and regional variation of density in the western Canada Basin. Geophys 40:56–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S (2017a) Airy’s isostatic model: a proposal for a realistic case. Arab J Geosci. 10:268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S (2017b) Moment of inertia for rock blocks subject to bookshelf faulting with geologically plausible density distributions. J Earth Syst Sci (submitted DOI not yet assigned)

  • Mukherjee S (2018) Locating center of pressure in 2D geological situations. J Indian Geophys Union 22:49–51

  • Mukherjee S, Khonsari MM (2017) Brittle rotational faults and the associated shear heating. Mar Petrol Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.09.003

  • Patwardhan AM (2012) The dynamic earth system. Third Edn. PHI Learning Pvt Ltd, pp 491. ISBN: 978–81-203-4655-0

  • Peel FJ (2014) The engines of gravity-driven movement on passive margins: quantifying the relative contribution of spreading vs. gravity sliding mechanisms. Tectonophysics 633:126–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

  • Rieke HH, Chilingarian CV (1974) Compaction of argillaceous sediments. Elsevier, Amsterdam. ISBN: 0–444-41054-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenzer R, Bagherbandi M, Vajda P (2012) Depth-dependent density change within the continental upper mantle. Contrib Geophys Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10126-012-0001-z

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

CPDA grant and a research sabbatical for the year 2017 provided by IIT Bombay. Reviewed positively by two anonymous reviewers. Chief Editor: Wolf-Christian Dullo, Managing Editor: Monika Dullo. Vide Mukherjee (2017a, b, 2018) for other derivations on isostatic cases, moment of inertia and center of pressure, respectively, for inhomogeneous rock mass as considered in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumyajit Mukherjee.

Appendix

Appendix

The minor derivation in Mukherjee (2017a) is redone

Consider a porous sedimentary layer, and that the pore space is filled up by a single phase (Eq. 2–1 in pp. 32 of Rieke and Chilinganian 1974):

$${\rho _{bw}}={\text{ }}{\rho _m}-{\text{ }}\left( {{\rho _m}-{\text{ }}{\rho _f}} \right)\emptyset ,$$
(29)

where ρ bw is the wet bulk density of sediments or the rock, ρ m is the matrix or mineral or grain density, ρ f is the fluid density, and \({\emptyset}\) is the porosity expressed as a fraction. If Athy’s (1930) empirical law works for the porosity reduction with depth in an exponential manner

$${\emptyset _z}={\emptyset _0}{{\text{e}}^{ - {\text{b}}z}},$$
(30)

where \({\emptyset _z}\) is the porosity at depth \(z,\,{\emptyset _z}\) 0 is the porosity at surface: z = 0, e is the exponential series, and b: a constant such that b −1 = λ is compaction constant.

Using the above two eqns,

$${\rho _{{\text{bw}}}}={\text{ }}{\rho _{\text{m}}}-{\text{ }}({\rho _{\text{m}}}-{\text{ }}{\rho _{\text{f}}}){\emptyset _0}{e^{ - {\text{b}}z}}.$$
(31)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, S. Locating center of gravity in geological contexts. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 107, 1935–1939 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-017-1560-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-017-1560-z

Keywords

Navigation