Skip to main content
Log in

Structure of pseudotachylyte vein systems as a key to co-seismic rupture dynamics: the case of Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone, central India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The secondary fractures associated with a major pseudotachylyte-bearing fault vein in the sheared aplitic granitoid of the Proterozoic Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone in central India are mapped at the outcrop scale. The fracture maps help to identify at least three different types of co-seismic ruptures, e.g., X–X′, T1 and T2, which characterize sinistral-sense shearing of rocks, confined between two sinistral strike-slip faults slipping at seismic rate. From the asymmetric distribution of tensile fractures around the sinistral-sense fault vein, the direction of seismic rupture propagation is predicted to have occurred from west-southwest to east-northeast, during an ancient (Ordovician?) earthquake. Calculations of approximate co-seismic displacement on the faults and seismic moment (M 0) of the earthquake are attempted, following the methods proposed by earlier workers. These estimates broadly agree to the findings from other studied fault zones (e.g., Gole Larghe Fault zone, Italian Alps). This study supports the proposition by some researchers that important seismological information can be extracted from tectonic pseudotachylytes of all ages, provided they are not reworked by subsequent tectonic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen JL (2005) A multi-kilometer pseudotachylyte system as an exhumed record of earthquake rupture geometry at hypocentral depth (Colorado, USA). Tectonophysics 402:37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho A, Vernon RH, Fitz Gerald JD (1995) Large volumes of anhydrous pseudotachylyte in the Woodroff Thrust, Eastern Musgrave Ranges, Australia. J Struct Geol 17:371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay A, Holdsworth RE (2009) Photo-of-the-month: ductilely deformed pseudo-tachylite layer in sheared granite of Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone, central India. J Struct Geol 31:353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay A, Khasdeo L (2011) Structural evolution of Gavilgarh–Tan shear zone, central India: a possible case of partitioned transpression during Mesoproterozoic oblique collision within the Central Indian Tectonic Zone. Precambr Res 186:70–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay A, Khasdeo L, Holdsworth RE, Smith SAF (2008) Fault reactivation and pseudotachylyte generation in the semi-brittle and brittle regimes: examples from Gavilgarh–Tan shear zone, central India. Geol Mag 145:766–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay A, Holdsworth RE, Kontak DJ, Sherlock SC, Widdowson M, Petrus J (2012) Neoproterozoic partitioned transpression and subsequent polyphase fault reactivation in Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone, central India: implications for Rodinia and Gondwana supercontinents. Abstract: ‘Gondwana to Asia’ Meeting: Adelaide, 2012

  • Cowan DS (1999) Do faults preserve a record of seismic slip? A field geologist’s opinion. J Struct Geol 21:995–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Toro G, Goldsby DL, Tullis TE (2004) Friction falls towards zero in quartz rocks as slip velocity approaches seismic rates. Nature 427:436–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Toro G, Pennacchioni G, Teza G (2005a) Can pseudotachylytes be used to infer earthquake source parameters? An example of limitations in the study of exhumed faults. Tectonophysics 402:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Toro G, Nielsen S, Pennacchioni G (2005b) Earthquake rupture dynamics frozen in exhumed ancient faults. Nature 436:1009–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Toro G, Pennacchioni G, Nielsen S (2009) Pseudotachylytes and earthquake source mechanics. In: Fukuyama E (ed) International geophysics, vol 94. Academic Press, New York, pp 87–133

  • Fagereng Å, Toy V (2011) Geology of earthquake source: an introduction. In: Fagereng Å, Toy V, Rowland JV (eds) Geology of the earthquake source: a volume in Honour of Rick Sibson. Geological Society, London. Special Publications 359, 1–16

  • Ferré EC, Allen JL, Lin A (2005) Pseudotachylites and seismogenic friction. Tectonophysics 402:1–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamond JF (1983) Displacement features associated with fault zones: a comparison between observed examples and experimental models. J Struct Geol 5:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith WA, Di Toro G, Pennacchioni G, Pollard DD (2008) Thin pseudotachylytes in faults of the Mt. Abbot quadrangle, Sierra Nevada: physical constraints for small seismic slip events. J Struct Geol 30:1086–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith WA, Rosakis A, Pollard D, Ko CW (2009) Dynamic rupture experiments elucidate tensile crack development during propagating earthquake ruptures. Geology 37:795–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grocott J (1981) Fracture geometry of pseudotachylyte generation zones: a study of shear fractures formed during seismic events. J Struct Geol 3:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84:2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose T, Shimamoto T (2003) Fractal dimension of molten surfaces as a possible parameter to infer the slip-weakening distance of faults from natural pseudotachylytes. J Struct Geol 25:1569–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Heaton T (2000) Microscopic and macroscopic physics of earthquakes. In: Rundle J, Turcotte D, Klein W (eds) Geocomplexity and the physics of earthquakes. Geophysical Monograph, 20. American Geophysical Union, DC, 127–141

  • Lin A (2008) Fossil earthquakes: the formation and preservation of pseudotachylytes. Springer,Berlin, 348 p

  • Lin A, Maruyama T, Aaron SB, Michibayashi K, Camacho A, Kano K (2005) Propagation of seismic slip from brittle to ductile crust: evidence from pseudotachylyte of the Woodroffe thrust, central Australia. Tectonophysics 402:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddock RH (1983) Melt origin of fault generated pseudotachylites as demonstrated by textures. Geology 11:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magloughlin JF (1992) Microstructural and chemical changes associated with cataclasis and friction melting at shallow crustal levels, the cataclasite- pseudotachylyte connection. Tectonophysics 204:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magloughlin JF, Spray JG (1992) Frictional melting processes and products in geological materials, introduction and discussion. Tectonophysics 204:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer A, Di Toro G, Griffith WA, Bistacchi A, Smith SAF, Nielsen S (2012) Inferring earthquake physics and chemistry using an integrated field and laboratory approach. J Struct Geol 39:2–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passchier CW (1982) Pseudotachylite and the development of ultramylonite bands in the Saint Barthelemy Massif, French Pyrenees. J Struct Geol 4:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy A, Prasad MH (2003) Tectonothermal events in Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ) and its implications in Rodinian crustal assembly. J Asian Earth Sci 22:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CH (1990) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 439p

  • Shimamoto T, Nagahama H (1992) An argument against the crush origin of pseudotachylytes based on the analysis of clast size distribution. J Struct Geol 14:999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibson RH (1975) Generation of pseudotachylyte by ancient seismic faulting. Geophys J Roy Astron Soc 43(3):775–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibson RH (1980) Transient discontinuities in ductile shear zones. J Struct Geol 2:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spray JG (1992) A physical basis for the frictional melting of some rock-forming minerals. Tectonophysics 204:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spray JG (1995) Pseudotachylyte controversy: fact or friction? Geology 23:1119–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson MT (1988) Pseudotachylyte-bearing strike-slip duplex structures in the Fort Foster Brittle Zone, S. Maine. J Struct Geol 10:813–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson MT (1992) Fault structure, wear mechanisms and rupture processes in pseudo-tachylyte generation. Tectonophysics 204:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empiricl relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1131–1137

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechmeister MS, Ferré EC, Cosca MA, Geissman JW (2007) Slow and fast deformation in the Dora Maira Massif, Italian Alps: Pseudotachylytes and inferences on exhumation history. J Struct Geol 29:1114–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research on pseudotachylytes of Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone was funded partly by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, and the University of Delhi in the form of sponsored research projects to AC. Department of Geology, University of Delhi provided the microscopic facility. L. Khasdeo is thanked for assistance during field work. We thank two anonymous reviewers of the journal for their excellent constructive and critical remarks which greatly benefited the paper. The Editor-in-chief Prof. W-C Dullo is thanked for his editorial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Chattopadhyay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chattopadhyay, A., Bhattacharjee, D. & Mukherjee, S. Structure of pseudotachylyte vein systems as a key to co-seismic rupture dynamics: the case of Gavilgarh–Tan Shear Zone, central India. Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) 103, 953–965 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0986-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-013-0986-1

Keywords

Navigation