Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics

  • Published:
Neural Computing & Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Several state-of-the-art techniques – a neural network, Bayesian neural network, support vector machine and naive Bayesian classifier – are experimentally evaluated in discriminating fluorescence

in situ hybridisation (FISH) signals. Highly-accurate classification of valid signals and artifacts of several cytogenetic probes (colours) is required for detecting abnormalities in FISH images. More than 3100 FISH signals are classified by each of the techniques into colour and as real or artifact with accuracies of around 98% and 88%, respectively. The results of the comparison also show a trade-off between simplicity represented by the naive Bayesian classifier, and high classification performance represented by the other techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lerner, B., Lawrence, N. A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques with Application to Cytogenetics . Neural Computing & Applications 10, 39–47 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005210170016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005210170016

Navigation