Skip to main content
Log in

Evolving neuro-fuzzy network for real-time high impedance fault detection and classification

  • Soft Computing Techniques: Applications and Challenges
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns the application of a neuro-fuzzy learning method based on data streams for high impedance fault (HIF) detection in medium-voltage power lines. A wavelet-packet-transform-based feature extraction method combined with a variation of evolving neuro-fuzzy network with fluctuating thresholds is considered for recognition of spatial–temporal patterns in the data. Wavelet families such as Haar, Symlet, Daubechie, Coiflet and Biorthogonal were investigated as a way to provide the most discriminative features for fault detection. The proposed evolving neuro-fuzzy classification model has shown to be particularly suitable for the problem because the HIF environment is subject to concept changes. Different from other statistical and intelligent approaches to the problem, the developed neuro-fuzzy model for HIF classification is not only parametrically, but also structurally adaptive to cope with nonstationarities and novelties. New neurons and connections are incrementally added to the neuro-fuzzy network when necessary for the identification of new patterns, such as faults and usual transients including sag, swell and spikes due to the switching of 3-phase capacitors and energization of transformers. Experimental evaluations compare the proposed classifier with other well-established computational intelligence methods, viz. multilayer perceptron neural network, learning vector quantization neural network and a support vector machine model. Results have shown that the evolving neuro-fuzzy system is effective and robust to changes. The system is able to maintain its detection and classification accuracy even in situations in which other classifiers exhibit a significant drop in accuracy due to gradual and abrupt changes of the fault patterns. Fuzzy rules are useful for interpretability purposes and help to enhance model credibility for decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ATP:

Alternative transients program

DWT:

Discrete wavelet transform

ECoS:

Evolving connectionist system

EFuNN:

Evolving fuzzy neural network

HIF:

High impedance fault

HP:

High-pass filter

MF:

Membership function

LP:

Low-pass filter

LVQ:

Learning vector quantization

MLP:

Multilayer perceptron

SVM:

Support vector machine

WPT:

Wavelet packet transform

\(D_i\) :

i-th diode

\(L_i\) :

i-th inductance

\(R_i\) :

i-th resistance

V :

Voltage

N :

Number of samples

x :

Input vector

y :

Output vector

H(x):

Entropy of x

W :

Weight vector

\(S_{\mathrm{thr}}\) :

Sensitivity threshold

\(E_{\mathrm{thr}}\) :

Error threshold

\(A_j\) :

Activation degree of the j-th neuron

\(D_j\) :

j-th normalized fuzzy distance

\(\eta\) :

Learning rate

References

  1. Sedighizadeh M, Rezazadeh A, Elkalashy NI (2010) Approaches in high impedance fault detection: a chronological review. Adv Electr Comput Eng 10(3):114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghaderi A, Ginn H, Mohammadpour H (2017) High impedance fault detection: a review. Electr Power Syst Res 143:376–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Santos WC, Lopes FV, Brito N, Souza B (2017) High impedance fault identification on distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 32(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva S, Costa P, Gouvea M, Lacerda A, Alves F, Leite D (2018) High impedance fault detection in power distribution systems using wavelet transform and evolving neural network. Electr Power Syst Res 154:474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Samantaray SR, Panigrahi BK, Dash PK (2008) High impedance fault detection in power distribution networks using time–frequency transform and probabilistic neural network. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2(2):261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Etemadi AH, Pasand MS (2008) High impedance fault detection using multi-resolution signal decomposition and adaptive neural fuzzy inference system. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2(1):110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baqui I, Zamora I, Mazon J, Buigues G (2011) High impedance fault detection methodology using wavelet transform and artificial neural networks. Electr Power Syst Res 81:1325–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen J, Phung B, Zhang D, Blackburn T, Ambikairajah E (2013) Study on high impedance fault arcing current characteristics. In: Australasian universities power engineering conference, pp 1–6

  9. Torres V, Guardado JL, Ruiz HF, Maximov S (2014) Modelling and detection of high impedance faults. Electr Power Energy Syst 61:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leite D, Ballini R, Costa P, Gomide F (2012) Evolving fuzzy granular modeling from nonstationary fuzzy data streams. Evolv Syst 3(2):65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Angelov P, Filev D, Kasabov N (2010) Evolving intelligent systems: methodology and applications, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohamad S, Sayed-Mouchaweh M, Bouchachia A (2018) Active learning for classifying data streams with unknown number of classes. Neural Netw 98:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andonovski G, Music G, Blazic S, Skrjanc I (2018) Evolving model identification for process monitoring and prediction of non-linear systems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 68:214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyde R, Angelov P, Mackenzie A (2017) Fully online clustering of evolving data streams into arbitrarily shaped clusters. Inf Sci 382:96–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pratama M, Lughofer E, Lim C, Rahayu W, Dillon T, Budiyono A (2017) A novel evolving semi-supervised classifier. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19:863–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasabov N (2007) Evolving connectionist systems: the knowledge engineering approach. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pratama M, Anavatti SG, Angelov P, Lughofer E (2014) PANFIS: a novel incremental learning machine. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 25(1):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leite D, Costa P, Gomide F (2013) Evolving granular neural networks from fuzzy data streams. Neural Netw 38(1):1–16

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Leite D, Costa P, Gomide F (2010) Evolving granular neural network for semi-supervised data stream classification. In: IEEE international joint conference on neural networks, pp 1–8

  20. Rubio JJ (2014) Evolving intelligent algorithms for the modelling of brain and eye signals. Appl Soft Comput 14(B):259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubio JJ (2018) Error convergence analysis of the SUFIN and CSUFIN. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lughofer E, Pratama M, Skrjanc I (2018) Incremental rule splitting in generalized evolving fuzzy systems for autonomous drift compensation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(4):1854–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leite D, Palhares R, Campos V, Gomide F (2015) Evolving granular fuzzy model-based control of nonlinear dynamic systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(4):923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zamanan N, Sykulski J (2014) The evolution of high impedance fault modeling. In: IEEE 16th international conference on harmonics and quality of power, pp 77–81

  25. Kersting WH (2001) Radial distribution test feeders. In: Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Columbus, pp 908–912

  26. Ghaffarzadehand N, Vahidi B (2010) A new protection scheme for high impedance fault detection using wavelet packet transform. Adv Electr Comput Eng 81(3):17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barros J, Diego RI (2008) Analysis of harmonics in power systems using the wavelet-packet transform. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(1):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Costa F, Souza B, Brito N, Silva J, Santos W (2015) Real-time detection of transients induced by high impedance faults based on the boundary wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 51(6):5313–5323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haykin S (2009) Neural networks and learning machines, 3rd edn. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rubio J, Lughofer E, Meda-Campana J, Paramo LA, Novoa J, Pacheco J (2018) Neural network updating via argument Kalman filter for modeling of Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy models. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(2):2585–2596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lughofer E (2012) Single-pass active learning with conflict and ignorance. Evolv Syst 3(4):251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubio J, Lughofer E, Angelov P, Novoa J, Meda-Campana J (2018) A novel algorithm for the modeling of complex processes. Kybernetika 54(1):79–95

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Abe S (2010) Support vector machines for pattern classification. Advances in pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Leite.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, S., Costa, P., Santana, M. et al. Evolving neuro-fuzzy network for real-time high impedance fault detection and classification. Neural Comput & Applic 32, 7597–7610 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3789-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3789-2

Keywords

Navigation