Skip to main content
Log in

Nonparametric frontier analysis models for efficiency evaluation in insurance industry: a case study of Iranian insurance market

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance evaluation and efficiency analysis is considered to be one of the critical responsibilities of the management department. This paper investigates and assesses the efficiency and performance of Iranian insurance companies through nonparametric frontier analysis (FA) models. The two well-known nonparametric FA models, data envelopment analysis (DEA) and free disposal hull, are utilized to separate the efficient companies from the inefficient companies, and two well-known super-efficiency analysis models are utilized to rank the efficient units. For the further analysis, critical inputs are also identified for inefficient companies using DEA sensitivity analysis which is a powerful tool for planning performance improvement project, and the reference sets are also identified as the benchmark pattern for each inefficient unit. Managerial insights and implications of the study are discussed finally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.tse.ir.

References

  1. Al-Amri K, Gattoufi S, Al-Muharrami S (2012) Analyzing the technical efficiency of insurance companies in GCC. J Risk Financ 13(4):362–380

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen P, Petersen NC (1993) A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 39(10):1261–1264

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barros CP, Nektarios M, Assaf A (2010) Efficiency in the Greek insurance industry. Eur J Oper Res 205(2):431–436

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bikker JA, Van Leuvensteijn M (2008) Competition and efficiency in the Dutch life insurance industry. Appl Econ 40(16):2063–2084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Camp RC (1995) Business process benchmarking: finding and implementing best practices. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WS

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cummins JD, Weiss MA, Xie X, Zi H (2010) Economies of scope in financial services: a DEA efficiency analysis of the US insurance industry. J Bank Financ 34(7):1525–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labour-efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurement. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eling M, Luhnen M (2008) Frontier efficiency methodologies to measure performance in the insurance industry: overview and new empirical evidence. University of St. Gallen, Working Papers on Risk Management and Insurance Paper No. 56

  11. Eling M, Luhnen M (2010) Efficiency in the international insurance industry: a cross-country comparison. J Bank Financ 34(7):1497–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120(3):253–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fenn P, Vencappa D, Diacon S, Klumpes P, O’Brien C (2008) Market structure and the efficiency of European insurance companies: a stochastic frontier analysis. J Bank Financ 32(1):86–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardle W, Jeong SO (2005) Nonparametric productivity analysis. SFB 649 Discussion Papers

  15. Ho CT, Zhu DS (2004) Performance measurement of Taiwan’s commercial banks. Int J Prod Perform Manage 53(5):425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jandaghi G, Seresht MN, Mokhles A, Kharazi H (2011) Market-orientation and its impact on the performance of Asia Insurance Company in Kerman province. J Contemp Bus Stud 2(7):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kader HA, Adams M, Hardwick P (2010) The cost efficiency of Takaful insurance companies. Geneva Pap 35(1):161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):418–429

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Korhonen PJ, Siitari PA (2007) Using lexicographic parametric programming for identifying efficient units in DEA. Comput Oper Res 34(7):2177–2190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Leverty JT, Grace MF (2010) The robustness of output measures in property-liability insurance efficiency studies. J Bank Financ 34(7):1510–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luo X (2003) Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Bus Res 56(8):627–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Puyenbroeck TV (1998) Some remarks on modified FDH. J Prod Anal 9(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shih-Fang L, Wen-Min L (2006) Does size matter? Finding the profitability and marketability benchmark of financial holding companies. Asia Pac J Oper Res 23(2):229–247

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang M, Lin H (2011) The evaluation of the performance of 360 degree feedback system in insurance industry-a case study of a life insurance company. In: 2011 IEEE 18th international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IE&EM), pp 237–242

  25. Wang X (2010) Data envelopment analysis. Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved from http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-042910-114555/unrestricted/MQP_Report.pdf

  26. Wu H, Zeng XF (2011) Application of computer technology in efficiency analysis of China Life Insurance Company. J Comput 6(9):1832–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zanghieri P (2009) Efficiency of European Insurance Companies: Do Local Factors Matter? Working Paper, Association of Italian Insurers, Rome. Available at SSRN 1354108. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1354108

  28. Zhong C, Sun WJ (2011) Insurance Intermediary and Cost X-Efficiency of China’s Insurance Firms. In: 2011 International conference on management and service science (MASS), pp 1–4. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5998449

  29. Zhu J (2003) Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Hatami-Shirkouhi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahmani, I., Barati, B., Majazi Dalfard, V. et al. Nonparametric frontier analysis models for efficiency evaluation in insurance industry: a case study of Iranian insurance market. Neural Comput & Applic 24, 1153–1161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1320-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1320-8

Keywords

Navigation