Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of fetal state from the cardiotocogram recordings using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a new scheme was presented for the prediction of fetal state from fetal heart rate (FHR) and the uterine contraction (UC) signals obtained from cardiotocogram (CTG) recordings. CTG recordings are widely used in pregnancy and provide very valuable information regarding fetal well-being. The information effectively extracted from these recordings can be used to predict pathological state of the fetus and makes an early intervention possible before there is an irreversible damage to the fetus. The proposed scheme is based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS). Using features extracted from the FHR and UC signals, an ANFIS was trained to predict the normal and the pathological state. The method was tested with clinical data that consist of 1,831 CTG recordings. Out of these 1,831 recordings, 1,655 of them were classified as normal and the remaining 176 were classified as pathological by a consensus of three expert obstetricians. It was demonstrated that the ANFIS-based method was able to classify the normal and the pathologic states with 97.2 and 96.6 % accuracy, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers I (1985) The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152(5):524–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goddard R (2001) Electronic fetal monitoring is not necessary for low risk labours. Br Med J 322:1436–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R (1987) Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet 25:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van-Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L (1997) Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynecol Obstet 57(1):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palomaki O, Luukkaala T, Luoto R, Tuimala R (2006) Intrapartum cardiotocography—the dilemma of interpretational variation. J Perinat Med 34(4):298–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jongsma HW, Nijhuis JG (1986) Classification of fetal and neonatal heart rate patterns in relation to behavioural states. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 21(5–6):293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgoulas G, Stylios CD, Nokas G, Groumpos PP (2004) Classification of fetal heart rate during labour using hidden Markov models. Proc IEEE Int Joint Conf Neural Netw 3:2471–2474

    Google Scholar 

  8. Signorini MG, de Angelis A, Magenes G, Sassi R, Arduini D, Cerutti S (2000) Classification of fetal pathologies through fuzzy inference systems based on a multiparametric analysis of fetal heart rate. Comput Cardiol 27:435–438

    Google Scholar 

  9. Georgoulas G, Stylios CD (2006) Predicting the risk of metabolic acidosis for newborns based on fetal heart rate signal classification using support vector machines. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53(5):875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spilka J, Chudacek V, Koucky M, Lhotska L (2009) Assessment of non-linear features for intrapartal fetal heart rate classification. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on information technology and applications in biomedicine, ITAB 2009, Larnaca, pp 1–4

  11. Georgoulas G, Stylios CD, Groumpos PP (2005) Feature extraction and classification of fetal heart rate using wavelet analysis and support vector machines. Int J Artif Intell Tools 15:411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magenes G, Signorini MG, Arduini D (2000) Classification of cardiotocographic records by neural networks Neural Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE-INNS-ENNS international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN’00), vol 3, pp 637–641

  13. Magenes G, Signorini MG, Sassi R (2001) Multiparametric analysis of fetal heart rate: comparison of neural and statistical methods. Proc Medicon 2001:360–363

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jang J (1993) ANFIS: Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frank A, Asuncion A (2010) UCI machine learning repository. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  17. Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Garrido A, Marques-de-Sa J, Pereira-Leite L (2000) SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. J Matern Fetal Med 5:311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. MATLAB Documentation (2000) Fuzzy toolbox user’s guide of MATLAB. The MathWorks, Inc

  19. Chiu SL (1994) Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2:267–278

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang LC, Chang FJ (2001) Intelligent control of modeling of real time reservoir operation. Hydrol Process 15:1621–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Ocak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ocak, H., Ertunc, H.M. Prediction of fetal state from the cardiotocogram recordings using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Neural Comput & Applic 23, 1583–1589 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1110-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1110-3

Keywords

Navigation