Skip to main content
Log in

An artificial neural network for prediction of gas holdup in bubble columns with oily solutions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gas holdup in a bubble column reactor filled with oil-based liquids was estimated by an artificial neural network (ANN). The ANN was trained using experimental data from the literature with various sparger pore diameters and a bubbly flow regime. The trained ANN was able to predict that the gas holdup of data did not seen during the training period over the studied range of physical properties, operating conditions, and sparger pore diameter with average normalized square error <0.05. Comparisons of the neural network predictions to correlations obtained from experimental data show that the neural network was properly designed and could powerfully estimate gas holdup in bubble column with oily solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Ar :

Archimedes number

d C :

Column diameter (m)

d p :

Mean pore diameter (m)

d S :

Sparger diameter (m)

Eo :

Eotvos number

Fr :

Froude number

H L :

Liquid heights before gas injection (m)

H D :

Liquid heights after gas injection (m)

n 1 :

Dimension of the input vector

n 2 :

Number of hidden neurons

t :

Time (s)

U g :

Superficial gas velocity (m/s)

v ij :

The connection weights from input neuron i to hidden neuron j

V :

Volume (m3)

w :

The connection weights

w ij :

Connection weight from input neuron i to hidden neuron j

x :

Input variable

y :

Output variable

g :

Acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2)

ε g :

Gas holdup

σ :

Surface tension (N/m)

μ :

Viscosity (Pa s)

ρ :

Density (kg/m3)

g:

Gas phase

L:

Liquid phase

References

  1. Camarasa E, Vial C, Wild G, Midoux N, Bouillard J (1999) Influence of coalescence behavior of liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column. Chem Eng Proc 38:329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kastanek F, Zahradnik J, Kratochvil J, Cermak J (1983) Chemical reactors for gas–liquid systems. Ellis Horwood, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deckwer WD, Schumpe A (1993) Improved tools for bubble column reactor design and scale-up. Chem Eng Sci 48(5):889–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delnoij E, Lammers F, Kuipers J, van Swaaij W (1997) Dynamic simulation of dispersed gas–liquid two-phase flow using a discrete bubble model. Chem Eng Sci 52:1429–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mudde RF (2005) Gravity-driven bubbly flows. Annual Rev Fluid Mec 37:393–423

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Sikun X, Yuhui Q, Chaouki J, Guy C (2005) Characterization of homogeneity of bubble flows in bubble columns using RPT and fiber optics. Int J Chem React Eng 3:Article A54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Homayouni SS, Mehrnia MR, Mostoufi N, Rajabi M, Yazdani A (2008) Bubble size distribution in oil-based bubble columns. Chem Eng Technol 31(11):1668–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krishna R, Urseanu MI, Van Batten JM, Ellenberger J (1999) Influence of scale on the hydrodynamics of bubble columns operating in the churn-turbulent regime: experiments vs. Eulerian simulations. Chem Eng Sci 54:4903–4911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorenz O, Schumpe A, Ekambara K, Joshi JB (2005) Liquid phase axial mixing in bubble columns operated at high pressures. Chem Eng Sci 60:3573–3586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang N, Chen J, Ge W, Li J (2010) A conceptual model for analyzing the stability condition and regime transition in bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci 65(1):517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehrnia MR, Towfighi J, Bonakdarpour B, Akbarnejad MM (2005) Gas hold-up and oxygen transfer in a draft-tube airlift bioreactor with petroleum-based liquids. Biochem Eng J 22:105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfleger D, Gomes S, Gilbert N, Wagner HG (1999) Hydrodynamic simulations of laboratory scale bubble columns fundamental studies of the Eulerian–Eulerian modeling approach. Chem Eng Sci 54:5091–5099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thakre SS, Joshi JB (1999) CFD simulation of bubble column reactors: importance of drag force formulation. Chem Eng Sci 54:5055–5060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ripley BD (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhat N, McAvoy TJ (1990) Use of neural nets for dynamic modeling and control of chemical process systems. Comput Chem Eng 14(4/5):573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollia M, Stanislaoa MD, Bagatinb R, Abu Bakra E (2002) Bubble size distribution in the sparger region of bubble columns. Chem Eng Sci 57(1):197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leib TM, Mills PL, Lerou JJ, Turner JR (1995) Evaluation of neural networks for simulation of three phase bubble column reactors. Trans IChemE 73:690–696

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakajima Y, Kikuchi R, Tsutsumi A, Otawara K (2001) Nonlinear modeling of chaotic dynamics in a circulating fluidized bed by an artificial neural network. J Chem Eng Jpn 34(2):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Alvarez E, Corea JM, Riverol C, Navaza JM (2000) Model based in neural networks for the prediction of the mass transfer coefficients in bubble columns. Study in Newtonian and non-Newtonianian fluids. Int Comm Heat Mass Transfer 27(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. AL-Masry WA (2006) Analysis of hydrodynamics of external loop circulating bubble columns with open channel gas separators using neural networks. Chem Eng Res Des 84(6):483–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin HY, Chen W, Tsutsumi A (2003) Long-term prediction of nonlinear hydrodynamics in bubble columns by using artificial neural networks. Chem Eng Proc 42(8–9):611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaikh A, Al-Dahhan M (2003) Development of an artificial neural network correlation for prediction of overall gas holdup in bubble column reactors. Chem Eng Proc 42(8–9):599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baawain MS, Gamal El-Din M, Smith DW (2007) Artificial neural networks modeling of ozone bubble columns: mass transfer coefficient, gas hold up, and bubble size. Ozone: Sci Eng 29:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yazdani A (2007) Hydrodynamic behavior of bubble column with oily solutions, M.Sc. thesis, University of Tehran, Iran

  25. Mouza AA, Dalakoglou GK, Paras SV (2005) Effect of liquid properties on the performance of bubble column reactors with fine pore spargers. Chem Eng Sci 60(5):1465–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kazakis NA, Papadopoulos SV, Mouza AA (2007) Bubble columns with fine pore sparger operating in the pseudo-homogeneous regime: gas hold up prediction and a criterion for the transition to heterogeneous regime. Chem Eng Sci 62:3092–3103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. El Ouahed AK, Tiab D, Mazouzi A (2005) Application of artificial intelligence to characterize naturally fractured zones in Hassi Messaoud Oil Field, Algeria. J Pet Sci Eng 49:122–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Mehrnia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amiri, S., Mehrnia, M.R., Barzegari, D. et al. An artificial neural network for prediction of gas holdup in bubble columns with oily solutions. Neural Comput & Applic 20, 487–494 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0566-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0566-x

Keywords

Navigation