Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consensus proposal for 5HT3 antagonists in the prevention of acute emesis related to highly emetogenic chemotherapy

Dose, schedule, and route of administration

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective antagonists to the Type 3 serotonin receptor (5HT3) in combination with corticosteroids are now considered the standard of care for the prevention of emesis from moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Here we address issues of optimal dose, schedule and route of administration of four currently available selectable 5HT3 antagonists. This paper utilizes an evidence based medicine approach to the literature regarding this class of drugs, emphasizing the results large, randomized, controlled trials to make formal recommendations concerning optimal use of this important new class of anti-emetic agents. We conclude that for each drug there is a plateau in therapeutic efficacy at a definable dose level above which further dose escalation does not improve outcome. Furthermore, a single dose is as effective as multiple doses or continuous infusion, and finally, emerging data demonstrate that the oral route is equally efficacious as the intravenous route of administration, even with highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gandara, D., Roila, F., Warr, D. et al. Consensus proposal for 5HT3 antagonists in the prevention of acute emesis related to highly emetogenic chemotherapy . Support Care Cancer 6, 237–243 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200050160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005200050160

Navigation