Skip to main content
Log in

Moderators of intervention efficacy for Finding My Way: A web-based psychosocial intervention for cancer-related distress

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The present analysis explores whether demographic, psychosocial, or intervention adherence factors moderated treatment efficacy of Finding My Way (FMW), an efficacious self-directed web-based psychosocial program for newly diagnosed curatively treated cancer patients.

Methods

Participants (n = 191) completed a 6-module intervention (n = 94) or attention-control (n = 97) program. Outcome measures were completed at baseline (T0), post-program (T1), 3-month (T2), and 6-month (T3) follow ups. Age, gender, social support, information processing style (monitoring vs blunting), emotion-regulation difficulties, and intervention adherence were examined as potential moderators.

Results

Age moderated emotional functioning and general distress at T3 with significant intervention benefits only observed in younger participants; age moderated cognitive functioning at T1, with intervention benefits only found in older participants. Gender moderated helplessness/hopelessness, emotional functioning, and cognitive avoidance at T1 with men benefitting more from receiving the intervention vs control. Monitoring information-processing style moderated cancer distress and anxious preoccupation at T3: higher monitors benefitted more from receiving the intervention vs control. Program adherence moderated global QOL, emotional functioning and social functioning at T2 and T3; cognitive avoidance (T1), anxious preoccupation (T2) and role function (T3), with those who completed more of the program benefitting more if they received the intervention than control. Emotion dysregulation and social support each moderated role function at T2, with those more dysregulated and less socially supported benefitting more if they received the intervention than control.

Conclusions

For select outcomes, FMW is more effective for patients with specific characteristics; these findings can inform future tailoring and targeting of online programs for cancer-distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fridriksdottir N, Gunnarsdottir S, Zoega S, Ingadottir B, Hafsteinsdottir EJG (2018) Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients’ symptoms: review of randomized trials. Support Care Cancer 26(2):337–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McAlpine H, Joubert L, Martin-Sanchez F, Merolli M, Drummond KJ (2015) A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns 98(3):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouma G (2015) Internet-based support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 95:26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beatty L, Koczwara B, Wade T (2016) Evaluating the efficacy of a self-guided Web-based CBT intervention for reducing cancer-distress: a randomised controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 24(3):1043–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chambers SK, Ritterband LM, Thorndike F, Nielsen L, Aitken JF, Clutton S, Scuffham PA, Youl P, Morris B, Baade PD, Dunn J (2018) Web-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for distressed cancer patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 20(1):e42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Urech C, Grossert A, Alder J, Scherer S, Handschin B, Kasenda B, Borislavova B, Degen S, Erb J, Faessler A, Gattlen L, Schibli S, Werndli C, Gaab J, Berger T, Zumbrunn T, Hess V (2018) Web-based stress management for newly diagnosed patients with cancer (STREAM): a randomized, wait-list controlled intervention study. J Clin Oncol 36(8):780–788. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.8491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Beatty L, Kemp E, Coll JR, Turner J, Butow P, Milne D, Yates P, Lambert S, Wootten A, Yip D, Koczwara B (2019) Finding My Way: results of a multicentre RCT evaluating a web-based self-guided psychosocial intervention for newly diagnosed cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 27(7):2533–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4526-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalter J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Sweegers MG, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, Newton RU, Courneya KS, Aitken JF, Armes J, Arving C, Boersma LJ, Braamse AMJ, Brandberg Y, Chambers SK, Dekker J, Ell K, Ferguson RJ, Gielissen MFM, Glimelius B, Goedendorp MM, Graves KD, Heiney SP, Horne R, Hunter MS, Johansson B, Kimman ML, Knoop H, Meneses K, Northouse LL, Oldenburg HS, Prins JB, Savard J, van Beurden M, van den Berg SW, Brug J, Buffart LM (2018) Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 22 RCTs. Psychooncology 27(4):1150–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Küffner R (2013) Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.40.8922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heron-Speirs HA, Baken DM, Harvey ST (2012) Moderators of psycho-oncology therapy effectiveness: meta-analysis of socio-demographic and medical patient characteristics. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 19(4):402–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Willems RA, Mesters I, Lechner L, Kanera IM, Bolman CAW (2017) Long-term effectiveness and moderators of a web-based tailored intervention for cancer survivors on social and emotional functioning, depression, and fatigue: randomized controlled trial. J Cancer Surviv 11(6):691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heckman CJ, Handorf EA, Darlow SD, Ritterband LM, Manne SL (2017) An online skin cancer risk-reduction intervention for young adults: Mechanisms of effects. Health Psychol 36(3):215–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kornblith AB, Herndon JE, Zuckerman E, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI, Cooper MR, Harris L, Tkaczuk KH, Perry MC, Budman D, Norton L, Holland JC (2001) Social support as a buffer to the psychological impact of stressful life events in women with breast cancer. Cancer 91:443–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vodermaier A, Linden W (2019) Social support buffers against anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with cancer only if support is wanted: a large sample replication. Support Care Cancer 27(7):2345–2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04737-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roussi P, Miller SM (2014) Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 37(5):931–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9553-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaughan E, Koczwara B, Kemp E, Freytag C, Tan W, Beatty L (2019) Exploring emotion regulation as a mediator of the relationship between resilience and distress in cancer. Psychooncology 28(7):1506–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1991) 1989–1990 National health survey users’ guide. ABS. Cat No. 4363.0., Canberra

  18. Bronner MB, Nguyen MH, Smets EMA, Ven AWH, Weert JCM (2018) Anxiety during cancer diagnosis: Examining the influence of monitoring coping style and treatment plan. Psychooncology 27(2):661–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beatty L, Kemp E, Wade T, Koczwara B (2015) Finding My Way: protocol of a randomised controlled trial evaluating an internet self-help program for cancer-related distress. BMC Cancer 15(1):328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1322-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Foa EB, Riggs DS, Dancu CV, Rothbaum BO (1993) Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 6:459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PH (1995) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS). University of New South Wales, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechter H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JCJM, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osobo D, Razavi D, Rofe PB, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F (1993) The European Organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Watson M, Law M, dos Santos M, Greer S, Baruch J, Bliss J (1994) The Mini-MAC: Further development of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale. J Psychosoc Oncol 12(3):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL (1991) The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 32(6):705–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller SM (1987) Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:345–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gratz KL, Roemer L (2004) Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 26(1):41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Joba.0000007455.08539.94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beatty L, Kemp E, Binnion C, Turner J, Milne D, Butow P, Lambert S, Yates P, Yip D, Koczwara B (2017) Uptake and adherence to an online intervention for cancer-related distress: older age is not a barrier to adherence but may be a barrier to uptake. Support Care Cancer 25(6):1905–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamilton J, Kruse H, Holcomb L, Freche R (2018) Distress and psychosocial needs: demographic predictors of clinical distress after a diagnosis of cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs 22(4):390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pergolotti M, Battisti NML, Padgett L, Sleight AG, Abdallah M, Newman R, Van Dyk K, Covington KR, Williams GR, van den Bos F, Pollock Y, Salerno EA, Magnuson A, Gattás-Vernaglia IF, Ahles TA (2020) Embracing the complexity: Older adults with cancer-related cognitive decline-A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology position paper. J Geriatr Oncol 11(2):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Altman M, Huang TT, Breland JY (2018) Design thinking in health care. Prev Chron Dise 15:E117. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180128

  31. National Institute of Health and Care Guidelines (NICE) (2016) Community engagement: improving health and wellbeing and reducing health inequalities. NICE guideline [NG44]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng44. Accessed 15 June 2021

  32. Jackson SE, Chester JD (2015) Personalised cancer medicine. Int J Cancer 137(2):262–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28940

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cuijpers P, Christensen H (2016) Are personalised treatments of adult depression finally within reach? Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 26(1):40–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204579601600007X

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the National Health & Medical Research Council (Grant No. 1042942). Dr Lisa Beatty is funded by a Cancer Council SA Fellowship. We would like to thank Dr Joseph Coll for conducting all the project’s statistical analyses, and our late colleague and co-investigator, Mr Paul Katris, for his invaluable support and input into the Finding My Way project. The Finding My Way authorship group includes: Professor Tracey Wade, Ms Caroline Richards, Mr Michael Fitzgerald, Professor Desmond Yip, Dr. Sarah McKinnon, Ms. Simone Noelker, Dr. Louise Gorman, Ms. Bernadette Zappa, Ms. Judy Allen, Ms. Sally Sara, Ms. Lisa Mackenzie, Mr. Edward Craft, Ms. Kathryn Stafford, Ms. Ruby Lipson-Smith, and Ms. Rose Kamateros.

Thank you to consumer representative Ms Julie Marker (Cancer Voices SA), who reviewed the concept outline/protocol, assisted with the intervention development phase, and provided input with recruitment throughout the study. We also thank Breast Cancer Network Australia and Register4, and their staff, for assistance with recruitment.

Thank you to the men and women who participated in this trial, we hope you found, and continue to find, the program helpful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Beatty.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (RTF 773 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 942 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beatty, L., Kemp, E., Turner, J. et al. Moderators of intervention efficacy for Finding My Way: A web-based psychosocial intervention for cancer-related distress. Support Care Cancer 29, 7669–7678 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06291-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06291-w

Keywords

Navigation