Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of rescue medication utilization with up to 3 subsequent doses of paclitaxel in patients who underwent an infusion rate escalation versus those who continued on the standard infusion rate after experiencing an initial paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) requiring rescue medications.
Methods
A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on patients who experienced a paclitaxel infusion HSR requiring rescue medications to their first or second lifetime dose of paclitaxel.
Results
A total of 99 patients were included for analysis, and from this group, 22 patients were continued on the standard infusion rate, while 77 patients were changed to an infusion rate escalation. The rate of subsequent rescue medication utilization was 5% in patients who were continued at the standard infusion rate versus 23% in patients who were changed to an infusion rate escalation (p = 0.064). The incidence of subsequent rescue medication utilization was unrelated to disease stage (p = 0.39), the paclitaxel dosing regimen (p = 0.99), or a diagnosis of asthma (p = 0.99).
Conclusion
This single-center, retrospective study suggests that while not statistically significant, there was a potentially clinically meaningful increase in the rate of subsequent rescue medication utilization in patients who were changed to an infusion rate escalation compared to those who continued on the same standard infusion rate after experiencing an initial HSR to paclitaxel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data was collected and managed using the secure software REDCap, behind the OSUWMC firewall. All patient identifiers were removed and coded data was saved in an Excel spreadsheet.
References
TAXOL (paclitaxel) [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Revised April 2011
Picard M (2017) Management of hypersensitivity reactions. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am 37:679–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2017.07.004
Picard M, Castells MC (2015) Re-visiting hypersensitivity reactions to taxanes: a comprehensive review. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol. 49:177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-014-8416-0
Boulanger J, Boursiquot JN, Cournoyer G, Lemieux J, Masse MS, Almanric K, Guay MP, Des pratiques en oncologie TC (2014) Management of hypersensitivity to platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy: cepo review and clinical recommendations. Curr Oncol. 21(4):e630–e641. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.1966
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf. Published November 27, 2017. Accessed August 8, 2019.
Feldweg AM, Lee CW, Matulonis UA, Castells M (2005) Rapid desensitization for hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel and docetaxel: a new standard protocol used in 77 successful treatments. Gynecol. Oncol. 96:824–829
Patton C, Hedgpeth N, Grabau K, Lu D. Evaluation of a standardized titration schedule to be utilized for the administration of all paclitaxel infusions. ONS 43rd Annual Congress; June 17-20, 2018; Washington, DC
Pagan J. Simple adjustment key to paclitaxel infusion protocol that reduced hypersensitivity reactions. Oncology Nurse Advisor. https://www.oncologynurseadvisor.com/home/headlines/conference-coverage/ons-annual-congress-2018/simple-adjustment-key-to-paclitaxel-infusion-protocol-that-reduced-hypersensitivity-reactions/. Published May 20, 2018. Accessed May 14, 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Principal investigator: Craig Vargo. Co-investigators: Kristen Nymberg, Michael Berger, Stephanie Folan, Jeffrey VanDeusen, Kyle Zanath, and Junan Li.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This study received approval by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board.
Consent to participate
N/A.
Consent for publication
N/A.
Code availability
N/A.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nymberg, K., Folan, S., Berger, M. et al. Comparison of subsequent infusion hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel using two different infusion strategies. Support Care Cancer 29, 4423–4429 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-05991-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-05991-7