Abstract
Purpose
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report questionnaire designed to screen anxious and depressive states in patients in non-psychiatric settings. In spite of its large use, no agreement exists in literature on HADS accuracy in case finding. The present research addresses the issue of HADS accuracy in cancer patients, comparing its two subscales (HADS-A and HADS-D) against tools not in use in psychiatry, which are able to detect prolonged negative emotional states.
Methods
2121 consecutive adult cancer inpatients were administered the HADS together with the State Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Scale on Depression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to identify a cut-off for anxious and depressive states in cancer patients. All indicators were computed together with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
Results
Data of 1628 and 1035 participants were used to assess the accuracy in case finding of HADS-A and HADS-D, respectively. According to the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off was > 9 units for the HADS-A and > 7 units for the HADS-D. The area under the ROC curve was 0.90 for HADS-A (95% CI 0.88–0.91) and 0.84 for HADS-D (95% CI 0.81–0.86).
Conclusions
This study suggested that risk scores of anxious and depressive states above specific HADS cut-offs are useful in identifying anxious and depressive states in cancer patients, and they may thus be applicable in clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370
Snaith RP, Zigmond AS (1994) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale manual. Nelson, Windsor, NFER
Snaith RP (2003) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:29
Herrmann C (1997) International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res 42:17–41
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77
Vodermaier A, Linden W, Siu C (2009) Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: a systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(21):1464–1488
Mitchell AJ, Meader N, Symonds P (2010) Diagnostic validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in cancer and palliative settings: a metaanalysis. J Affective Disord 126:335–348
Brennan C, Worrall-Davies A, McMillan D, Gilbody S, House A (2010) The hospital anxiety and depression scale: a diagnostic meta-analysis of case-finding ability. J Psychosom Res 69:371–378
Carey M, Noble N, Sanson-Fisher R, Mackenzie L (2012) Identifying psychological morbidity among people with cancer using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: time to revisit first principles? Psycho-Oncol. 21:229–238
Vodermaier A, Millman RD (2011) Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 19:1899–1908
Annunziata MA, Muzzatti B, Altoè G (2011) Defining Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) structure by confirmatory factor analysis: a contribution to validation for oncological settings. Ann Oncol 22:2330–2333
Spielberger CD (1983) State-trait anxiety inventory (form Y). Mind Garden, Palo Alto (CA)
Radloff L (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1:385–401
Spielberger CD (1989) S.T.A.I. (State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory). Inventario per l’ansia di stato e di tratto. Forma Y. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze
Pedrabissi L, Santinello M (1989) Verifica della validità dello STAI forma Y di Spielberger. BPA. 191:11–14
Macor A, Pedrabissi L, Santinello M. (190). Ansia di stato e di tratto: ulteriore contributo alla verifica della validità psicometrica e teorica dello S.T.A.I. forma Y di Spielberger. Psicologia e Società. 15: 67–74
Pierfederici A, Fava GA, Munari F et al (1982) Validazione italiana del CES-D per la misurazione della depressione. In: Canestrari R (ed) Nuovi metodi in psicoterapia. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze, pp 95–103
Fava GA (1983) Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. J Clin Psychol 39:249–251
Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P (1999) Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). J Psychosom Res 46:437–443
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 143:29–36
Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283–298
Rodgers J, Martin C, Morse R et al (2005) An investigation into the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with breast cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 3:41
Cosco TD, Doyle F, Ward M, McGee H (2012) Latent structure of the Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale: a 10-year systematic review. J Psychosom Res 72:180–184
Norton S, Cosco T, Doyle F, Done J, Sacker A (2013) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a meta confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychosom Res 74:74–81
Straat JH, van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K (2013) Methodological artifacts in dimensionality assessment of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). J Psychosom Res 74:116–121
Maters GA, Sanderman R, Kim AY, Coyne JC (2013) Problems in cross-cultural use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: “no butterflies in the desert”. PLoS One 8:e70975
Cameron IM, Scott NW, Adler M, Reid IC (2014) A comparison of three methods of assessing differential item functioning (DIF) in the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale: ordinal logistic regression, Rasch analysis and the Mantel chi square procedure. Qual Life Res 23:2883–2888
Verdam MG, Oort FJ, Sprangers MA (2017) Item bias detection in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using structural equation modeling: comparison with other item bias detection methods. Qual Life Res 26:1439–1450
Saboonchi S, Wennman-Larsen A, Alexanderson K, Petersson ML (2013) Examination of the construct validity of the Swedish version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in breast cancer patients. Qual Life Res 22:2849–2856
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ms. Luigina Mei for her editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All participants gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS (CRO-2011-27).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Maria Antonietta Annunziata and Barbara Muzzatti should be considered joint first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Annunziata, M.A., Muzzatti, B., Bidoli, E. et al. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) accuracy in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 28, 3921–3926 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05244-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05244-8