Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perception of side effects associated with anticancer treatment in women with breast or ovarian cancer (KEM-GO-1): a prospective trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Due to advances in anticancer treatment and supportive care, patients increasingly complained about nonphysical side effects of chemotherapy and targeted therapy in recent years. Therefore, continuous assessment of side effects and patients’ perceptions is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the identification and severity of side effects perceived by ovarian cancer (OC) and breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing contemporary anticancer therapy.

Methods

Between 2015 and 2017, consecutive chemo-naïve OC and BC patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Interviews were performed 12 ± 3 weeks after start of anticancer therapy, and patients were asked to select and rank, according to severity, 72 physical or nonphysical symptoms potentially related to their treatment. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

Forty-five OC patients and 98 BC patients completed the interview. Sleeping difficulties were ranked as the most troublesome symptom, followed by concerns about family or partner, and loss of hair. Alopecia was the most predominant side effect for BC patients, whereas OC patients were highly afflicted by numbness in limbs. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with targeted therapy caused pronounced sleep disturbances. Prolonged taxane treatment led to shortness of breath and numbness in limbs. Vomiting was ranked by one and nausea by eight women among the five most bothersome symptoms.

Conclusions

Sleep disturbances have lately emerged as the most severe problem in women with OC or BC receiving anticancer therapy. Concerns about family and partner were ranked second in the current study and first in previous investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pierce SR, Clark LH (2018) Current first-line therapy for ovarian Cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv 73:650–657. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Thill M, Thomssen C, Müller V, Janni W, AGO Breast Committee (2018) AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early breast Cancer: update 2018. Breast Care (Basel) 13:196–208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ataseven B, Chiva LM, Harter P, Gonzalez-Martin A, du Bois A (2016) FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer revisited. Gynecol Oncol 142:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A et al (2019) ESMO–ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29:728–760. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kayl AE, Meyers CA (2006) Side-effects of chemotherapy and quality of life in ovarian and breast cancer patients. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000192996.20040.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu C, Ling W, Zhang J, Gao H, Shen K, Ma X (2017) Safety and efficacy evaluation of pertuzumab in patients with solid tumors. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6870. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marchetti C, Muzii L, Romito A, Benedetti Panici P (2019) First-line treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer: focus on bevacizumab. Onco Targets Ther Volume 12:1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S155425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stark D, Nankivell M, Pujade-Lauraine E, Kristensen G, Elit L, Stockler M, Hilpert F, Cervantes A, Brown J, Lanceley A, Velikova G, Sabate E, Pfisterer J, Carey MS, Beale P, Qian W, Swart AM, Oza A, Perren T (2013) Standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer: quality-of-life outcomes from the international collaboration on ovarian neoplasms (ICON7) phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70567-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, Hsieh YC, Beer TM (2004) How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? a comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the quality-of-life questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol 22:3485–3490. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.03.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Maio M, Gallo C, Leighl NB et al (2015) Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 33:910–915. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, Sowerbutts T, Frewin C, Fox RM, Tattersall MH (1983) On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:203–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin AM, Butow PN, Coates AS, Childs AM, Ellis PM, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH (1996) On the receiving end. V: patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993. Ann Oncol 7:189–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Boer-Dennert M, de Wit R, Schmitz PI, Djontono J, v Beurden V, Stoter G, Verweij J (1997) Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. Br J Cancer 76:1055–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A, Germanaud J, Thuillier A, Khayat D (2002) Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 95:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Russo S, Cinausero M, Gerratana L, Bozza C, Iacono D, Driol P, Deroma L, Sottile R, Fasola G, Puglisi F (2014) Factors affecting patient’s perception of anticancer treatments side-effects: an observational study. Expert Opin Drug Saf 13:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2013.830710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Molassiotis A, Aapro M, Herrstedt J, Gralla R, Roila F (2017) MASCC/ESMO antiemetic guidelines: introduction to the 2016 guideline update. Support Care Cancer 25:267–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3324-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Strittmatter G, Tilkorn M, Mawick R (2002) How to identify patients in need of psychological intervention. Recent Results Cancer Res 160:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedlander M, Rau J, Lee CK, Meier W, Lesoin A, Kim JW, Poveda A, Buck M, Scambia G, Shimada M, Hilpert F, King MT, Debruyne P, Bologna A, Malander S, Monk BJ, Petru E, Calvert P, Herzog TJ, Barrett C, du Bois A (2018) Quality of life in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) randomized to maintenance pazopanib or placebo after first-line chemotherapy in the AGO-OVAR 16 trial. Measuring what matters—patient-centered end points in trials of maintenance therapy. Ann Oncol 29:737–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fallowfield LJ (2018) Quality of life assessment using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: still a Cinderella outcome? Ann Oncol 29:2286–2287. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sasaki H, Tamura K, Naito Y, Ogata K, Mogi A, Tanaka T, Ikari Y, Masaki M, Nakashima Y, Takamatsu Y (2017) Patient perceptions of symptoms and concerns during cancer chemotherapy: ‘affects my family’ is the most important. Int J Clin Oncol 22:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1117-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Roscoe JA, Kaufman ME, Matteson-Rusby ES et al (2007, 2007) Cancer-related fatigue and sleep disorders. Oncologist (12 Suppl 1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.12-S1-35

  22. Fiorentino L, Rissling M, Liu L, Ancoli-Israel S (2011) The symptom cluster of sleep, fatigue and depressive symptoms in breast Cancer patients: severity of the problem and treatment options. Drug Discov Today Dis Models 8:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmod.2011.05.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fiorentino L, Ancoli-Israel S (2006) Insomnia and its treatment in women with breast cancer. Sleep Med Rev 10:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2006.03.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Clevenger L, Schrepf A, Degeest K, Bender D, Goodheart M, Ahmed A, Dahmoush L, Penedo F, Lucci J 3rd, Thaker PH, Mendez L, Sood AK, Slavich GM, Lutgendorf SK (2013) Sleep disturbance, distress, and quality of life in ovarian cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis. Cancer 119:3234–3241. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28188

  25. Ohayon MM (2011) Epidemiological overview of sleep disorders in the general population. Sleep med res 2:1–9. https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2011.2.1.1

  26. Gordon AM, Mendes WB, Prather AA (2017) The social side of sleep: elucidating the links between sleep and social processes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 26:470–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417712269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Joffe H, Massler A, Sharkey KM (2010) Evaluation and management of sleep disturbance during the menopause transition. Semin Reprod Med 28:404–421. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262900

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121:1513–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frey MK, Ellis AE, Koontz LM, Shyne S, Klingenberg B, Fields JC, Chern JY, Blank SV (2017) Ovarian cancer survivors’ acceptance of treatment side effects evolves as goals of care change over the cancer continuum. Gynecol Oncol 146:386–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasconcelos I, Wiesske A, Schoenegg W (2018) Scalp cooling successfully prevents alopecia in breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy. Breast 40:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin H, Jo SJ, Kim DH, Kwon O, Myung SK (2015) Efficacy of interventions for prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 136:E442–E454. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Komen MMC, Smorenburg CH, van den Hurk CJG, Nortier JWR (2013) Factors influencing the effectiveness of scalp cooling in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Oncologist 18:885–891. https://doi.org/10.1634/THEONCOLOGIST.2012-0332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mikuła-Pietrasik J, Witucka A, Pakuła M, Uruski P, Begier-Krasińska B, Niklas A, Tykarski A, Książek K (2019) Comprehensive review on how platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy of ovarian cancer affects biology of normal cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 76:681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2954-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuoka A, Maeda O, Mizutani T, Nakano Y, Tsunoda N, Kikumori T, Goto H, Ando Y (2016) Bevacizumab exacerbates paclitaxel-induced neuropathy: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 11:e0168707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beyhan Ataseven.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Ärztekammer Nordrhein, Germany; number: 2015147, 2015) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

Beyhan Ataseven reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche and Tesaro; personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, and Celgene; and nonfinancial support from PharmaMar, outside the submitted work.

Johanna Frindte, Gudrun Gebers, Caroline Vogt, Alexander Traut, and Vincenzo Bluni have nothing to disclose.

Philipp Harter reports grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Tesaro, and Public funding (ASCO, DKH, DFG); personal fees from Sotio, Stryker, Zai Lab, MSD, Clovis, and Immunogen; and grants from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medac, and Genmab, outside the submitted work.

Elisabeth Breit reports personal fees from Olympus Europa SE & CO and Sysmex Europe GmbH, outside the submitted work.

Mattea Reinisch reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Novartis and Pfizer; personal fees from Roche Pharma, Eli Lilly, Hexal, Daiichi Sankyo, and AstraZeneca; and nonfinancial support from Celgene, outside the submitted work.

Florian Heitz reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Clovis and personal fees and nonfinancial support from PharmaMar and Tesaro, outside the submitted work.

Athina Kostara reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Astra Zeneca and nonfinancial support from Tesaro and Somatex, outside the submitted work.

Sherko Kuemmel reports personal fees from Roche, Genomic Health, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Somatex, MSD, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Eli Lilly, Genentech, and PFM medical and personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work.

Sonia Prader reports nonfinancial support from Tesaro, outside the submitted work.

Mareike Bommert reports nonfinancial support from prIME Oncology, outside the submitted work.

Stephanie Schneider reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Tesaro, and Roche and nonfinancial support from Tesaro, outside the submitted work.

Andreas du Bois reports personal fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Tesaro, Clovis, Pfizer, Genmab, Pharmar, Biocad, and MSD, outside the submitted work.

Informed consent

Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The manuscript is part of a doctoral thesis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ataseven, B., Frindte, J., Harter, P. et al. Perception of side effects associated with anticancer treatment in women with breast or ovarian cancer (KEM-GO-1): a prospective trial. Support Care Cancer 28, 3605–3615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05216-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05216-y

Keywords

Navigation