Abstract
Purpose
Due to advances in anticancer treatment and supportive care, patients increasingly complained about nonphysical side effects of chemotherapy and targeted therapy in recent years. Therefore, continuous assessment of side effects and patients’ perceptions is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the identification and severity of side effects perceived by ovarian cancer (OC) and breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing contemporary anticancer therapy.
Methods
Between 2015 and 2017, consecutive chemo-naïve OC and BC patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Interviews were performed 12 ± 3 weeks after start of anticancer therapy, and patients were asked to select and rank, according to severity, 72 physical or nonphysical symptoms potentially related to their treatment. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
Results
Forty-five OC patients and 98 BC patients completed the interview. Sleeping difficulties were ranked as the most troublesome symptom, followed by concerns about family or partner, and loss of hair. Alopecia was the most predominant side effect for BC patients, whereas OC patients were highly afflicted by numbness in limbs. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with targeted therapy caused pronounced sleep disturbances. Prolonged taxane treatment led to shortness of breath and numbness in limbs. Vomiting was ranked by one and nausea by eight women among the five most bothersome symptoms.
Conclusions
Sleep disturbances have lately emerged as the most severe problem in women with OC or BC receiving anticancer therapy. Concerns about family and partner were ranked second in the current study and first in previous investigations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pierce SR, Clark LH (2018) Current first-line therapy for ovarian Cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv 73:650–657. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000613
Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Thill M, Thomssen C, Müller V, Janni W, AGO Breast Committee (2018) AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early breast Cancer: update 2018. Breast Care (Basel) 13:196–208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489329
Ataseven B, Chiva LM, Harter P, Gonzalez-Martin A, du Bois A (2016) FIGO stage IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer revisited. Gynecol Oncol 142:597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.013
Colombo N, Sessa C, du Bois A et al (2019) ESMO–ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 29:728–760. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000308
Kayl AE, Meyers CA (2006) Side-effects of chemotherapy and quality of life in ovarian and breast cancer patients. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000192996.20040.24
Zhu C, Ling W, Zhang J, Gao H, Shen K, Ma X (2017) Safety and efficacy evaluation of pertuzumab in patients with solid tumors. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6870. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006870
Marchetti C, Muzii L, Romito A, Benedetti Panici P (2019) First-line treatment of women with advanced ovarian cancer: focus on bevacizumab. Onco Targets Ther Volume 12:1095–1103. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S155425
Stark D, Nankivell M, Pujade-Lauraine E, Kristensen G, Elit L, Stockler M, Hilpert F, Cervantes A, Brown J, Lanceley A, Velikova G, Sabate E, Pfisterer J, Carey MS, Beale P, Qian W, Swart AM, Oza A, Perren T (2013) Standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer: quality-of-life outcomes from the international collaboration on ovarian neoplasms (ICON7) phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70567-3
Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, Hsieh YC, Beer TM (2004) How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? a comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the quality-of-life questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol 22:3485–3490. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.03.025
Di Maio M, Gallo C, Leighl NB et al (2015) Symptomatic toxicities experienced during anticancer treatment: agreement between patient and physician reporting in three randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 33:910–915. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9334
Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, Sowerbutts T, Frewin C, Fox RM, Tattersall MH (1983) On the receiving end--patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:203–208
Griffin AM, Butow PN, Coates AS, Childs AM, Ellis PM, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH (1996) On the receiving end. V: patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993. Ann Oncol 7:189–195
de Boer-Dennert M, de Wit R, Schmitz PI, Djontono J, v Beurden V, Stoter G, Verweij J (1997) Patient perceptions of the side-effects of chemotherapy: the influence of 5HT3 antagonists. Br J Cancer 76:1055–1061
Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A, Germanaud J, Thuillier A, Khayat D (2002) Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 95:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10630
Russo S, Cinausero M, Gerratana L, Bozza C, Iacono D, Driol P, Deroma L, Sottile R, Fasola G, Puglisi F (2014) Factors affecting patient’s perception of anticancer treatments side-effects: an observational study. Expert Opin Drug Saf 13:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2013.830710
Molassiotis A, Aapro M, Herrstedt J, Gralla R, Roila F (2017) MASCC/ESMO antiemetic guidelines: introduction to the 2016 guideline update. Support Care Cancer 25:267–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3324-x
Strittmatter G, Tilkorn M, Mawick R (2002) How to identify patients in need of psychological intervention. Recent Results Cancer Res 160:353–361
Friedlander M, Rau J, Lee CK, Meier W, Lesoin A, Kim JW, Poveda A, Buck M, Scambia G, Shimada M, Hilpert F, King MT, Debruyne P, Bologna A, Malander S, Monk BJ, Petru E, Calvert P, Herzog TJ, Barrett C, du Bois A (2018) Quality of life in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) randomized to maintenance pazopanib or placebo after first-line chemotherapy in the AGO-OVAR 16 trial. Measuring what matters—patient-centered end points in trials of maintenance therapy. Ann Oncol 29:737–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx796
Fallowfield LJ (2018) Quality of life assessment using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: still a Cinderella outcome? Ann Oncol 29:2286–2287. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy481
Sasaki H, Tamura K, Naito Y, Ogata K, Mogi A, Tanaka T, Ikari Y, Masaki M, Nakashima Y, Takamatsu Y (2017) Patient perceptions of symptoms and concerns during cancer chemotherapy: ‘affects my family’ is the most important. Int J Clin Oncol 22:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1117-y
Roscoe JA, Kaufman ME, Matteson-Rusby ES et al (2007, 2007) Cancer-related fatigue and sleep disorders. Oncologist (12 Suppl 1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.12-S1-35
Fiorentino L, Rissling M, Liu L, Ancoli-Israel S (2011) The symptom cluster of sleep, fatigue and depressive symptoms in breast Cancer patients: severity of the problem and treatment options. Drug Discov Today Dis Models 8:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ddmod.2011.05.001
Fiorentino L, Ancoli-Israel S (2006) Insomnia and its treatment in women with breast cancer. Sleep Med Rev 10:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2006.03.005
Clevenger L, Schrepf A, Degeest K, Bender D, Goodheart M, Ahmed A, Dahmoush L, Penedo F, Lucci J 3rd, Thaker PH, Mendez L, Sood AK, Slavich GM, Lutgendorf SK (2013) Sleep disturbance, distress, and quality of life in ovarian cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis. Cancer 119:3234–3241. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28188
Ohayon MM (2011) Epidemiological overview of sleep disorders in the general population. Sleep med res 2:1–9. https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2011.2.1.1
Gordon AM, Mendes WB, Prather AA (2017) The social side of sleep: elucidating the links between sleep and social processes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 26:470–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417712269
Joffe H, Massler A, Sharkey KM (2010) Evaluation and management of sleep disturbance during the menopause transition. Semin Reprod Med 28:404–421. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262900
Sklenarova H, Krümpelmann A, Haun MW, Friederich HC, Huber J, Thomas M, Winkler EC, Herzog W, Hartmann M (2015) When do we need to care about the caregiver? supportive care needs, anxiety, and depression among informal caregivers of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Cancer 121:1513–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29223
Frey MK, Ellis AE, Koontz LM, Shyne S, Klingenberg B, Fields JC, Chern JY, Blank SV (2017) Ovarian cancer survivors’ acceptance of treatment side effects evolves as goals of care change over the cancer continuum. Gynecol Oncol 146:386–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.029
Vasconcelos I, Wiesske A, Schoenegg W (2018) Scalp cooling successfully prevents alopecia in breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy. Breast 40:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.012
Shin H, Jo SJ, Kim DH, Kwon O, Myung SK (2015) Efficacy of interventions for prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 136:E442–E454. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29115
Komen MMC, Smorenburg CH, van den Hurk CJG, Nortier JWR (2013) Factors influencing the effectiveness of scalp cooling in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Oncologist 18:885–891. https://doi.org/10.1634/THEONCOLOGIST.2012-0332
Mikuła-Pietrasik J, Witucka A, Pakuła M, Uruski P, Begier-Krasińska B, Niklas A, Tykarski A, Książek K (2019) Comprehensive review on how platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy of ovarian cancer affects biology of normal cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 76:681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2954-1
Matsuoka A, Maeda O, Mizutani T, Nakano Y, Tsunoda N, Kikumori T, Goto H, Ando Y (2016) Bevacizumab exacerbates paclitaxel-induced neuropathy: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 11:e0168707. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168707
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Ärztekammer Nordrhein, Germany; number: 2015147, 2015) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
Beyhan Ataseven reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche and Tesaro; personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, and Celgene; and nonfinancial support from PharmaMar, outside the submitted work.
Johanna Frindte, Gudrun Gebers, Caroline Vogt, Alexander Traut, and Vincenzo Bluni have nothing to disclose.
Philipp Harter reports grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Tesaro, and Public funding (ASCO, DKH, DFG); personal fees from Sotio, Stryker, Zai Lab, MSD, Clovis, and Immunogen; and grants from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medac, and Genmab, outside the submitted work.
Elisabeth Breit reports personal fees from Olympus Europa SE & CO and Sysmex Europe GmbH, outside the submitted work.
Mattea Reinisch reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Novartis and Pfizer; personal fees from Roche Pharma, Eli Lilly, Hexal, Daiichi Sankyo, and AstraZeneca; and nonfinancial support from Celgene, outside the submitted work.
Florian Heitz reports personal fees from Roche, AstraZeneca, and Clovis and personal fees and nonfinancial support from PharmaMar and Tesaro, outside the submitted work.
Athina Kostara reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Astra Zeneca and nonfinancial support from Tesaro and Somatex, outside the submitted work.
Sherko Kuemmel reports personal fees from Roche, Genomic Health, Novartis, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Astra Zeneca, Somatex, MSD, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Eli Lilly, Genentech, and PFM medical and personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche and Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work.
Sonia Prader reports nonfinancial support from Tesaro, outside the submitted work.
Mareike Bommert reports nonfinancial support from prIME Oncology, outside the submitted work.
Stephanie Schneider reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Tesaro, and Roche and nonfinancial support from Tesaro, outside the submitted work.
Andreas du Bois reports personal fees from Roche, Astra Zeneca, Tesaro, Clovis, Pfizer, Genmab, Pharmar, Biocad, and MSD, outside the submitted work.
Informed consent
Written consent was obtained from all participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The manuscript is part of a doctoral thesis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ataseven, B., Frindte, J., Harter, P. et al. Perception of side effects associated with anticancer treatment in women with breast or ovarian cancer (KEM-GO-1): a prospective trial. Support Care Cancer 28, 3605–3615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05216-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05216-y