Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient navigation (PN) is a model of healthcare coordination designed to reduce barriers to achieving optimal health outcomes. Systematic reviews evaluating whether PN is associated with higher patient satisfaction with cancer care are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence of comparative studies evaluating the effectiveness of PN programs to improve satisfaction with cancer-related care. We included studies reported in English that: (1) evaluated a PN intervention designed to increase satisfaction with cancer care; and (2) involved a randomized controlled trial (RCT) or non-RCT approach. Standardized forms were used to abstract data from studies. These data were evaluated for methodological quality, summarized qualitatively, and synthesized under a random effects model.

Results

The initial search yielded 831 citations. Nine met inclusion criteria. Five had adequate data (1 RCT and 4 non-RCTs) to include in the meta-analysis. Methodological quality of included studies ranged from weak to strong, with half rated as weak. Findings of the RCTs showed a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with cancer care involving PN (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.30; 95% confidence interval 1.79, 2.80, p < 0.001). Pooled results from non-RCTs showed no significant association between PN and satisfaction with cancer-related care (standardized mean difference = 0.39; 95% confidence interval − 0.02, 0.80, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Although PN has been widely implemented to improve cancer care, high-quality studies are needed to characterize the relationship between PN and satisfaction with cancer-related care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wells KJ, Valverde P, Ustjanauskas AE, Calhoun EA, Risendal BC (2017) What are patient navigators doing, for whom, and where? A national survey evaluating the types of services provided by patient navigators. Patient Educ Couns 101:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells KJ, Nuhaily S (2018) Models of patient navigation. In: Calhoun E, Esparza A (eds) Developing and implementing patient navigation programs. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hopkins J, Mumber MP (2009) Patient navigation through the cancer care continuum: an overview. J Oncol Pract 5:150–152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Braun KL, Kagawa-Singer M, Holden AE, Burhansstipanov L, Tran JH, Seals BF, Corbie-Smith G, Tsark JU, Harjo L, Foo MA, Ramirez AG (2012) Cancer patient navigator tasks across the cancer care continuum. J Health Care Poor Underserved 23:398–413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (2014) NAPBC standards manual 2014 edition. American College of Suregons, Chicago, IL

  6. Oncology Nursing Society, Association of Oncology Social Workers, National Association of Social Workers (2010) Oncology Nursing Society, the Association of Oncology Social Work, and the National Association of Social Workers joint position on the role of oncology nursing and oncology social work in patient navigation. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:251–252

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman HP (2012) The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21:1614–1617. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Genoff MC, Zaballa A, Gany F, Gonzalez J, Ramirez J, Jewell ST, Diamond LC (2016) Navigating language barriers: a systematic review of patient navigators' impact on cancer screening for limited English proficient patients. J Gen Intern Med 31:426–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3572-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Paskett ED, Harrop JP, Wells KJ (2011) Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin 61(4):237–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, Garcia R, Greene A, Calhoun E, Mandelblatt JS, Paskett ED, Raich PC, Program PNR (2008) Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer 113:1999–2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23815

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sunny A, Rustveld L (2016) The role of patient navigation on colorectal cancer screening completion and education: a review of the literature. J Cancer Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1140-0

  12. Robinson-White S, Conroy B, Slavish KH, Rosenzweig M (2010) Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 33:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181c40401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baik SH, Gallo LC, Wells KJ (2016) Patient navigation in breast cancer treatment and survivorship: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol 34:3686–3696. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.5454

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiscella K, Ransom S, Jean-Pierre P, Cella D, Stein K, Bauer JE, Crane-Okada R, Gentry S, Canosa R, Smith T, Sellers J, Jankowski E, Walsh K (2011) Patient-reported outcome measures suitable to assessment of patient navigation. Cancer 117 (15, Suppl):3603-3617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26260

  15. Pratt-Chapman M, Simon MA, Patterson AK, Risendal BC, Patierno S (2011) Survivorship navigation outcome measures: a report from the ACS patient navigation working group on survivorship navigation. Cancer 117(15 Suppl):3575–3584. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26261

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Strusowski T, Sein E, Johnston D (2017) Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators announces standardized navigation metrics. Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship:8

  17. Reuters T (2016) EndNote, New York

  18. Pascoe GC (1983) Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann 6:185–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wells KJ, Lee JH, Calcano ER, Meade CD, Rivera M, Fulp WJ, Roetzheim RG (2012) A cluster randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of patient navigation in improving quality of diagnostic care for patients with breast or colorectal cancer abnormalities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21:1664–1672. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-12-0448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Effective Public Health Practice Project (1988) Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Effective Public Health Practice Project, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  21. Manager R (2014) The Cochrane collaboration. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell C, Craig J, Eggert J, Bailey-Dorton C (2010) Implementing and measuring the impact of patient navigation at a comprehensive community cancer center [corrected] [published erratum appears in Oncol Nurs Forum 2010 May;37:260]. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:61–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1188/10.ONF.61-68

  23. Donelan K, Mailhot JR, Dutwin D, Barnicle K, Oo SA, Hobrecker K, Percac-Lima S, Chabner BA (2011) Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography. J Gen Internal Med 26:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1436-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S (2008) The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health 85(1):114–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9228-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fillion L, de Serres M, Cook S, Goupil RL, Bairati I, Doll R (2009) Professional patient navigation in head and neck cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 25:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2009.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fiscella K, Whitley E, Hendren S, Raich P, Humiston S, Winters P, Jean-Pierre P, Valverde P, Thorland W, Epstein R (2012) Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer treatment: a randomized trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21:1673–1681. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harding M (2015) Effect of nurse navigation on patient care satisfaction and distress associated with breast biopsy. Clin J Oncol Nurs 19:E15–E20. https://doi.org/10.1188/15.CJON.E15-E20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee T, Ko I, Lee I, Kim E, Shin M, Roh S, Yoon D, Choi S, Chang H (2011) Effects of nurse navigators on health outcomes of cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 34:376–384. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182025007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Post DM, McAlearney AS, Young GS, Krok-Schoen JL, Plascak JJ, Paskett ED (2015) Effects of patient navigation on patient satisfaction outcomes. J Cancer Educ 30:728–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0772-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wells KJ, Winters PC, Jean-Pierre P, Warren-Mears V, Post D, Van Duyn MA, Fiscella K, Darnell J, Freund KM (2016) Effect of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer-related care. Support Care Cancer 24:1729–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2946-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hendriks AA, Oort FJ, Vrielink MR, Smets EM (2002) Reliability and validity of the Satisfaction with Hospital Care Questionnaire. Int J Qual Health Care 14:471–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM, Clark J, Darnell J, Holden A, Post D, Patierno SR, Winters PC (2011) Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study. Cancer 117:854–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bredart A, Mignot V, Rousseau A, Dolbeault S, Beauloye N, Adam V, Elie C, Leonard I, Asselain B, Conroy T (2004) Validation of the EORTC QLQ-SAT32 cancer inpatient satisfaction questionnaire by self- versus interview-assessment comparison. Patient Educ Couns 54:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00210-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marshall GN, Hays RD (1994) The patient satisfaction questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). Rand, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Comission on Cancer (2012) Cancer program standards: ensuring patient-centered care. American College of Surgeons

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kathryn Houk for her support in the development of the search strategy for this systematic review. We are also thankful to Charles Wells, Roxann Mouratidis, and Robyn Rosasco for their feedback on this manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers: 3U01CA116924-03S1, U54CA132384, U54CA132379, and R21CA161077. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Jean-Pierre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wells, K.J., Campbell, K., Kumar, A. et al. Effects of patient navigation on satisfaction with cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 26, 1369–1382 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4108-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4108-2

Keywords

Navigation