Abstract
Purpose
The National Cancer Institute has highlighted the need for psychosocial research to focus on Black cancer patients. This applies to Black men with prostate cancer, as there is little systematic research concerning psychological distress in these men. This study was designed to validate the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) in Black men with prostate cancer to help facilitate research within this group.
Methods
At three institutions, Black men with prostate cancer (n = 101) completed the MAX-PC, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the Distress Thermometer.
Results
The average age of the 101 men was 66 (SD = 10) and 58 % had early-stage disease. The MAX-PC and its subscales (Prostate Cancer Anxiety, PSA Anxiety, and Fear of Recurrence) produced strong coefficient alphas (0.89, 0.88, 0.71, and 0.77, respectively). Factor analysis supported the three-factor structure of the scale established in earlier findings. The MAX-PC also demonstrated strong validity. MAX-PC total scores correlated highly with the Anxiety subscale of the HADS (r = 0.59, p < 0.01) and the FACT Emotional Well-Being subscale (r = −0.55, p < 0.01). Demonstrating discriminant validity, the correlation with the HADS Depression subscale (r = 0.40, p < 0.01) and the CES-D (r = 0.42, p < 0.01) was lower compared to that with the HADS Anxiety subscale.
Conclusions
The MAX-PC is valid and reliable in Black men with prostate cancer. We hope the validation of this scale in Black men will help facilitate psychosocial research in this group that is disproportionately adversely affected by this cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACS, Cancer Facts and Figures. 2015, American Cancer Society: Atlanta.
Bennett GG, Badger TATA (2005) Depression in men with prostate cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 32(3):545–556
Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP (2000) Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int 86(7):834–839
Dale W et al. (2005) The role of anxiety in prostate carcinoma: a structured review of the literature. Cancer 104(3):467–478
Nordin KK et al. (2001) Predicting anxiety and depression among cancer patients: a clinical model. Eur J Cancer 37(3):376
Ravi P et al. (2014) Mental health outcomes in elderly men with prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 32(8):1333–1340
Anai S et al. (2006) Prostate cancer screening and detection in inner-city and underserved men. J Natl Med Assoc 98(4):515–519
Moul JW et al. (1995) Prostate-specific antigen values at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis in African-American men. AMAJama 274(16):1277–1281
Shuch B et al. (2004) Racial disparity of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(23):4725–4729
Roth AJ et al. (1998) Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer 82(10):1904–1908
Zabora J et al. (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10(1):19–28
Roth A et al. (2006) Assessing anxiety in men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC). Psychosomatics 47(4):340–347
Roth AJ et al. (2003) The memorial anxiety scale for prostate cancer: validation of a new scale to measure anxiety in men with with prostate cancer. Cancer 97(11):2910–2918
Pierce RR et al. (2003) Prostate cancer and psychosocial concerns in African American men: literature synthesis and recommendations. Health & Social Work 28(4):302
Nelson CJ, Balk EM, Roth AJ (2010) Distress, anxiety, depression, and emotional well-being in African-American men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology 19(10):1052–1060
Kornblith AB, Holland JC (1996) Model for quality-of-life research from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B: the telephone interview, conceptual approach to measurement, and theoretical framework. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 20
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370
Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(June):385–401
Cella DF et al. (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11(3):570–579
Karnofsky DA and Buchenal JH, The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. MacLeod CM, Editor. 1949, Columbia University Press: New York. p. 191–205.
Nunnally, J.C. and I.H. Bernstein, Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. 1994, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56(2):81–105
Gorusch, R.L., Factor analysis. 2nd ed. ed. 1983, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacCallum, R.C., et al., Sample size in factor analysis. In: Psychological methods. 1999. p. 84–99.
Underwood W 3rd et al. (2005) Racial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992-1999. Cancer 103(3):538–545
Kao AC et al. (1998) The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA 280(19):1708–1714
Krieger N et al. (2005) Experiences of discrimination: validity and reliability of a self-report measure for population health research on racism and health. Soc Sci Med 61(7):1576–1596
Dale W, Hemmerich J, Meltzer D (2007) Extending the validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) at the time of prostate biopsy in a racially-mixed population. Psychooncology 16(5):493–498
Consedine NS (2012) Are we worrying about the right men and are the right men feeling worried? Conscious but not unconscious prostate anxiety predicts screening among men from three ethnic groups. Am J Mens Health 6(1):37–50
Lepore SJ et al. (2012) Informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in predominantly immigrant black men: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 44(3):320–330
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by the Martell Foundation and grant #5R01-CA-85229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication and the respect to intellectual property. In so doing, we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
We further confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved either experimental animals or human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within this manuscript.
We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including the Editorial Manager and direct communications with the office). He is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions, and final approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, C.J., Starr, T.D., Macchia, R.J. et al. Assessing anxiety in Black men with prostate cancer: further data on the reliability and validity of the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC). Support Care Cancer 24, 2905–2911 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3092-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3092-7