Abstract
Purpose
People with cancer and their families experience high levels of psychological morbidity. However, many cancer services do not routinely screen patients for anxiety and depression, and there are no standardized clinical referral pathways. This study aimed to establish consensus on elements of a draft clinical pathway tailored to the Australian context.
Methods
A two-round Delphi study was conducted to gain consensus among Australian oncology and psycho-oncology clinicians about the validity of 39 items that form the basis of a clinical pathway that includes screening, assessment, referral and stepped care management of anxiety and depression in the context of cancer. The expert panel comprised 87 multidisciplinary clinician members of the Australian Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG). Respondents rated their level of agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as >80 % of respondents scoring within 2 points on the Likert scale.
Results
Consensus was reached for 21 of 39 items, and a further 15 items approached consensus except for specific contextual factors, after two Delphi rounds. Formal screening for anxiety and depression, a stepped care model of management and recommendations for inclusion of length of treatment and time to review were endorsed. Consensus was not reached on items related to roles and responsibilities, particularly those not applicable across cancer settings.
Conclusions
This study identified a core set of evidence- and consensus-based principles considered essential to a stepped care model of care incorporating identification, referral and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, Meader N (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol 12:160–174
Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M et al (2011) Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol 18:e265–e281
Walker J, Sawhney A, Hansen CH, Ahmed S, Martin P, Symeonides S et al (2014) Treatment of depression in adults with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med 44:897–907
Barrera I, Spiegel D (2014) Review of psychotherapeutic interventions on depression in cancer patients and their impact on disease progression. Int Rev Psychiatr 26:31–43
Subnis UB, Starkweather AR, McCain NL, Brown RF (2014) Psychosocial therapies for patients with cancer: A current review of interventions using psychoneuroimmunology-based outcome measures. Integr Cancer Ther 13:85–104
Newell S, Sanson-Fisher RW, Girgis A, Bonaventura A (1998) How well do medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists. Cancer 83:1640–1651
Jacobson PB (2007) Screening for psychological distress in cancer patients: challenges and opportunities. J Clin Oncol 25:4526–4527
Carlson LE, Groff SL, Maciejewski O, Bultz BD (2010) Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 28:4884–4891
Bultz BD, Groff SL, Fitch M et al (2011) Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice. Psycho-Oncology 20:463–469
Loscalzo M, Clark KL, Holland J (2011) Successful strategies for implementing biopsychosocial screening. Psycho-Oncology 20:455–462
Mitchell AJ, Kaar S, Coggan C, Herdman J (2008) Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders—preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists. Psycho-Oncology 17:226–236
Absolom K, Holch P, Pini S et al (2011) The detection and management of emotional distress in cancer patients: the views of health-care professionals. Psycho-Oncology 20:601–608
Meijer A et al (2013) Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 75(1):1–17
Mitchell AJ (2013) Screening for cancer-related distress: when is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful? Acta Oncol 52(2):216–224
Carlson LE, Waller A, Mitchell AJ (2012) Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations. J Clin Oncol 30:1160–1177
Panella M, Marchisio S, Di Stanislao F (2003) Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care 15:509–521
Luckett T, Butow PN, King MT (2009) Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions. Psycho-Oncology 18:1129–1138
Howell D, Keller-Olaman S, Oliver T, et al (2010) A Pan-Canadian Practice Guideline: Screening, Assessment and Care of Psychosocial Distress (Depression, Anxiety) in Adults with Cancer. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Action Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology: Toronto. Date Accessed: 31/7/2014
NCCN, Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Distress Management Version 2.(2013) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Date Accessed: 31/7/2014
Andersen BL, DeRubeis RJ, Berman BS et al (2014) Screening, assessment, and care of anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults with cancer: an american society of clinical oncology guideline adaptation. J Clin Oncol 31:1605–1619
National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW. Date Accessed: 31/7/2014
Zafar SY, Currow DC, Daugherty CK, Abernethy AP (2010) Standards for palliative care delivery in oncology settings. Cancer 16:436–443
Rankin N, Butow P, Thein T et al. Everybody wants it done but nobody wants to do it:’ an exploration of the barrier and enablers of critical components towards creating a clinical pathway for anxiety and depression in cancer. BMC Health Services Research. 15:28 DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-0691-9
Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A (1999) Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health Soc Care Comm 7:198–205
Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9
Akizuki N, Akechi T, Nakanishi T et al (2003) Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer. Cancer 97:2605–2613
Vanhaecht K, De Witte K, Panella M, Sermeus W (2009) Do pathways lead to better organized care processes? J Eval Clin Pract 15:782–788
Kadan-Lottick NS, Vanderwerker LC, Block SD et al (2005) Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer 104:2872–2881
Vanhaecht K, Panella M, van Zelm R, Sermeus W (2010) An overview on the history and concept of care pathways as complex interventions. Int J Care Pathw 14:117–123
Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 60:821–836
Akins RA, Tolson H, Cole BR (2005) Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:37. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-37
Dudgeon D, King S, Howell D et al (2012) Cancer care Ontario's experience with implementation of routine physical and psychological symptom distress screening. Psycho-Oncology 21:357–364
Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E et al (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006632
Grol R, Grimshaw J (2003) From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 362:1225–1230
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the contribution of all participants and Sydney Catalyst, who provided funding for the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors confirm no conflict of interest to declare
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaw, J.M., Price, M.A., Clayton, J.M. et al. Developing a clinical pathway for the identification and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: an online Delphi consensus process. Support Care Cancer 24, 33–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2742-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2742-5