Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adoptation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in cancer pain management by medical oncologists: a case vignette study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pain is a major problem in all cancer stages. Cancer pain guidelines are developed to improve management of pain. It is unclear whether these recommendations are applied in daily practice. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess medical oncologists’ adherence to an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in cancer pain management and their confidence in treatment choices.

Methods

A cross-sectional case vignette survey describing a patient with intractable pancreatic cancer and pain was sent to all 268 medical oncologists registered at the Netherlands Association of Internal Medicine. Descriptive statistics were conducted.

Results

Sixty-three of 268 medical oncologists (24 %) completed the survey. Adherence to the different recommendations of the guideline ranged from 18 to 100 %. Confidence for treatment choice ranged from 5.6 to 9.5 on a Numeric Rating Scale (0–10). Most of the responding oncologists (94 %) adhered to prescribing paracetamol as first-line pain treatment, and all prescribed a laxative in combination with opioids to prevent constipation. However, only 24 % of the respondents adhered to the guideline when first-line treatment had insufficient effect. Additionally, only 35 % adhered to the recommendation for insomnia treatment providing psychosocial support or using a multidimensional pain questionnaire besides pharmacological treatment. Finally, only 18 % adhered to the recommendation to perform a multidimensional pain assessment when disease worsens and pain increases.

Conclusions

The recommendations of the guideline have been partly adopted in cancer pain practice by medical oncologists. Particularly, pain assessment is not applied in the recommended manner. Therefore, implementation strategies should focus on adequate pain assessment in patients with cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG et al (2007) Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol 18:1437–1449

  2. de Wit R, van Dam F, Vielvoye-Kerkmeer A, Mattern C, Abu-Saad HH (1999) The treatment of chronic cancer pain in a cancer hospital in The Netherlands. J Pain Symptom Manage 17:333–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Enting RH, Oldenmenger WH, Van Gool AR, Van der Rijt CC, Sillevis Smitt PA (2007) The effects of analgesic prescription and patient adherence on pain in a Dutch outpatient cancer population. J Pain Symptom Manage 34:523–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meuser T, Pietruck C, Radbruch L et al (2001) Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology. Pain 93:247–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Potter J, Higginson IJ (2004) Pain experienced by lung cancer patients: a review of pervalence, causes and pathophysiology. Lung Cancer 43:247–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Passik SD, Breitbart WS (1996) Depression in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: diagnostic and treatment issues. Cancer 78:615–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis MP, Walsh D (2000) Epidemiology of cancer pain and factors influencing poor pain control. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 21:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen ML, Chang HK, Yeh CH (2000) Anxiety and depression in Taiwanese cancer patients with and without pain. J Adv Nurs 32:944–951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turk DC, Sist TC, Okifuji A et al (1998) Adaptation to metastatic cancer pain, regional/local cancer pain and non-cancer pain: role of psychological and behavioral factors. Pain 74:247–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland CS (1995) When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain 61:277–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vissers KCP, Besse TC, Groot CM et al (2008) Landelijke richtlijn: pijn bij kanker, 1.1 edn. The Netherlands

  12. Von Roenn JH, Cleeland CS, Gonin R, Hatfield AK, Pandya KJ (1999) Physician attitudes and practice in cancer pain management. A survey from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Intern Med 119:121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobsen R, Liubarskienë Z, Møldrup C (2009) Barriers to cancer pain management: a review of emperical research. Medicina (Kaunas) 45:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  14. Breuer B, Fleishman SB, Cruciani RA, Portenoy RK (2011) Medical oncologists’attitudes and practice in cancer pain management: a national survey. J Clin Oncol 20:4769–4775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Antón A, Montalar J, Carulla J et al (1993) Pain in clinical oncology: patient satisfaction with management of cancer pain. Eur J Pain 16:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ward SE, Goldberg N, Miller-McCauley V et al (1993) Patient-related barriers to management of cancer pain. Pain 52:319–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization (1996) Cancer pain relief: with a guide to opioid availability, 2nd edn. Geneva, Switzerland

  18. Pigni A, Brunelli C, Gibbins J et al (2010) Content development for European guidelines on the use of opioids for cancer pain: a systematic review and expert consencus study. Minerva Anestesiol 76:833–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piano V, Schalkwijk A, Burgres J et al (2013) Guidelines for neuropathic pain management in patients with cancer: a European survey and comparison. Pain Pract 13:349–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutten GM, Harting J, Rutten ST, Bekkering GE, Kremers SP et al (2006) Measuring physiotherapists guideline adherence by means of clinical vignettes: a validation study. J Eval Clin Pract 12:491–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Highes R, Huby M (2002) The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. J Adv Nurs 37:382–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fine P, Herr K, Titler M et al (2010) The cancer pain practice index: a measure of evidence-based practice adherence for cancer pain management in older adults in hospice care. J Pain Symptom Manage 39:791–802

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (2013) Kwaliteitsindicatoren 2014: basisset ziekenhuizen. Utrecht, the Netherlands

  24. Piano V, Lanteri-Minet M, Steegers M et al (2013) A case vignette study to assess the knowledge of pain physicians of neuroptahic cancer pain: room for improvement. Pain Physician 16:E779–E788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Luckett T, Davidson PM, Boyle F et al (2012) Australian survey of current practice and guideline use in adult cancer pain assessment and management: perspectives of oncologists. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. First published online: 17 Dec 2012

  26. Te Boveldt ND, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Jansen A, Vissers KC, Engels Y (2014) Pain is not systematically registered in Dutch medical oncology outpatients. Pain Pract [Epub ahead of print].

  27. Grol R (2001) Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 39:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roth M, Davies D, Friebert S et al (2013) Attitudes and practices of pediatric oncologists regarding methadone use in the treatment of cancer-related pain: results of a North American Survey. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 35:103–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by KWF (Dutch Cancer Society) and “Bergh in het Zadel” (private funding association).

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

NtB was principal investigator. All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. NtB was responsible for data collection and for analysis and data interpretation. All authors were responsible for writing the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript. Medical writers were involved (KV, KB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nienke te Boveldt.

Appendices

Appendix 1: case vignette

Appendix 2 additional references Table 2

  1. 1.

    Caraceni A, Cherny N, et al. Pain measurement tools and methods in clinical research in palliative care: recommendations of an Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;23: 239–255.

  2. 2.

    Jensen MP. The validity and reliability of pain measures in adults with cancer. J Pain 2003; 2:2–21.

  3. 3.

    de Rond ME, de Wit R, et al. A pain monitoring program for nurses: effects on communication, assessment and documentation of patients’ pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000;20: 424–439.

  4. 4.

    Au E, Loprinzi CL, et al. Regular use of a verbal pain scale improves the understanding of oncology inpatient pain intensity. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 2751–2755.

  5. 5.

    Axelsson B, Christensen SB. Is there an additive analgesic effect of paracetamol at step 3? A double-blind randomised controlled study. Palliative Medicine 2003;17: 724–725.

  6. 6.

    Stockler M, Vardy J, Pillai A, et al. Acetaminophen (paracetamol) improves pain and well-being in people with advanced cancer already receiving a strong opioid regimen: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trail. J Clin Oncol 2004; 16: 3389–3394.

  7. 7.

    Cherny N, Ripamonti C, Pereira J, et al. Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: an evidence- based report. J Clin Oncol 2001;19: 2542–2554.

  8. 8.

    McNicol E, Horowicz-Mehler N, Fisk R, et al. Management of opioid side effects in cancer-related and chronic noncancer pain: systematic review. J Pain 2003;4: 231–256

  9. 9.

    Wirz S, Klaschik E. Management of constipation in palliative care patients undergoing opioid therapy: is polyethylene an option? Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2005;22: 375–381

  10. 10.

    Yan BM, Myers RP. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for pain control in unresectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102: 430–438

  11. 11.

    Berger A, Hoffman DL, Goodman S, et al. Therapy switching in patients receiving long-acting opioids. Ann Pharmacother 2004; 38:389–395

  12. 12.

    Kloke M, Rapp M, Bosse B, et al. Toxicity and/or insufficient analgesia by opioid therapy: risk factors and the impact of changing the opioid. A retrospective analysis of 273 patients at a single center. Support Care Cancer 2000;8: 479–486.

  13. 13.

    Muller-Busch HC, Lindena G, Tietze K, et al. Opioid switch in palliative care, opioid choice by clinical need and opioid availability. Eur J Pain 2005 2005;9: 571–579

  14. 14.

    Quigley C. Opioid switching to improve pain relief and drug tolerability. The Cochrane Database of systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No. : CD004847.

  15. 15.

    Riley J, Ross JR, Rutter D, et al. No pain relief from morphine? Individual variation in sensitivity to morphine and the need to switch to an alternative opioid in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2006;14: 56–64.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

te Boveldt, N., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Besse, K. et al. Adoptation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline in cancer pain management by medical oncologists: a case vignette study. Support Care Cancer 23, 1409–1420 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2472-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2472-0

Keywords

Navigation