Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase II, randomized, double blind trial of calcium aluminosilicate clay versus placebo for the prevention of diarrhea in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Calcium aluminosilicate clay (CASAD) is a naturally occurring clay that serves as a cation exchange absorbent. We hypothesized that oral administration of CASAD would reduce the rate of grade 3/4 diarrhea associated with irinotecan use for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) by adsorbing the SN-38 metabolite.

Methods

Patients receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy were randomized equally between CASAD and placebo arms in this multicenter trial in order to assess differences in the proportions of patients with grade 3/4 diarrhea within 6 weeks. Additionally, we compared symptom severity between the two arms using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Results

Between May 2009 and May 2012, 100 patients were enrolled. In evaluable patients, 7 of 43 (16 %) on the CASAD arm compared to 3 of 32 (9 %) on the placebo arm experienced grade 3/4 diarrhea (P = 0.70). The rate of any diarrhea among all patients was similar (CASAD arm, 64 % vs. placebo arm, 70 %). The rate of study dropout was 14 % in the CASAD arm and 38 % in the placebo arm (P = 0.01). No differences were found in symptom severity, individual symptom items, and in serious adverse events between the two arms.

Conclusion

Compared to placebo, CASAD use was safe but ineffective in preventing diarrhea in metastatic CRC patients treated with irinotecan-containing chemotherapy regimens. There were no distinct signals in terms of patient symptoms between arms, but there was significantly more patient dropout in the placebo arm. Future CASAD trials will focus on the active treatment of diarrhea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63(1):11–30. doi:10.3322/caac.21166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sargent DJ, Köhne CH, Sanoff HK, Bot BM, Seymour MT, de Gramont A, Porschen R, Saltz LB, Rougier P, Tournigand C, Douillard JY, Stephens RJ, Grothey A, Goldberg RM (2009) Pooled safety and efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in nine first-line treatment trials using individual data from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(12):1948–1955. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2879

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kemeny NE (2013) Treatment of metastatic colon cancer: “the times they are A-changing”. J Clin Oncol 31(16):1913–1916. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.4500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ (2005) Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 352(5):476–487. doi:10.1056/NEJMra040958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Láng I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Zubel A, Celik I, Rougier P, Ciardiello F (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29(15):2011–2019. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.5091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carrato A, Swieboda-Sadlej A, Staszewska-Skurczynska M, Lim R, Roman L, Shparyk Y, Bondarenko I, Jonker DJ, Sun Y, De la Cruz JA, Williams JA, Korytowsky B, Christensen JG, Lin X, Tursi JM, Lechuga MJ, Van Cutsem E (2013) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus either sunitinib or placebo in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31(10):1341–1347. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.45.1930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haller DG, Rothenberg ML, Wong AO, Koralewski PM, Miller WH, Bodoky G, Habboubi N, Garay C, Olivatto LO (2008) Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone as second-line treatment after single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 26(28):4544–4550. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim GP, Sargent DJ, Mahoney MR, Rowland KM, Philip PA, Mitchell E, Mathews AP, Fitch TR, Goldberg RM, Alberts SR, Pitot HC (2009) Phase III noninferiority trial comparing irinotecan with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously treated with fluorouracil: N9841. J Clin Oncol 27(17):2848–2854. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4552

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilke H, Glynne-Jones R, Thaler J, Adenis A, Preusser P, Aguilar EA, Aapro MS, Esser R, Loos AH, Siena S (2008) Cetuximab plus irinotecan in heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan: MABEL Study. J Clin Oncol 26(33):5335–5343. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Benson AB, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, Engelking C, Kornblau SM, Martenson JA, McCallum R, Mitchell EP, O’Dorisio TM, Vokes EE, Wadler S (2004) Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 22(14):2918–2926. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.04.132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs CS, Moore MR, Harker G, Villa L, Rinaldi D, Hecht JR (2003) Phase III comparison of two irinotecan dosing regimens in second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(5):807–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E, Wierzbicki R, Ganju V, Jeffery M, Schulz J, Richards D, Soufi-Mahjoubi R, Wang B, Barrueco J (2007) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC-C Study. J Clin Oncol 25(30):4779–4786. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.11.3357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL (2000) Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med 343(13):905–914. doi:10.1056/NEJM200009283431302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stein A, Voigt W, Jordan K (2010) Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea: pathophysiology, frequency and guideline-based management. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2(1):51–63. doi:10.1177/1758834009355164

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saliba F, Hagipantelli R, Misset JL, Bastian G, Vassal G, Bonnay M, Herait P, Cote C, Mahjoubi M, Mignard D, Cvitkovic E (1998) Pathophysiology and therapy of irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective assessment. J Clin Oncol 16(8):2745–2751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stringer AM, Gibson RJ, Logan RM, Bowen JM, Yeoh AS, Burns J, Keefe DM (2007) Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea is associated with changes in the luminal environment in the DA rat. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 232(1):96–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Araki E, Ishikawa M, Iigo M, Koide T, Itabashi M, Hoshi A (1993) Relationship between development of diarrhea and the concentration of SN-38, an active metabolite of CPT-11, in the intestine and the blood plasma of athymic mice following intraperitoneal administration of CPT-11. Jpn J Cancer Res 84(6):697–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, Jandik P, Iveson T, Carmichael J, Alakl M, Gruia G, Awad L, Rougier P (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355(9209):1041–1047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Slatter JG, Schaaf LJ, Sams JP, Feenstra KL, Johnson MG, Bombardt PA, Cathcart KS, Verburg MT, Pearson LK, Compton LD, Miller LL, Baker DS, Pesheck CV, Lord RS (2000) Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of irinotecan (CPT-11) following I.V. infusion of [(14)C]CPT-11 in cancer patients. Drug Metab Dispos 28(4):423–433

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takasuna K, Hagiwara T, Hirohashi M, Kato M, Nomura M, Nagai E, Yokoi T, Kamataki T (1996) Involvement of beta-glucuronidase in intestinal microflora in the intestinal toxicity of the antitumor camptothecin derivative irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats. Cancer Res 56(16):3752–3757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikuno N, Soda H, Watanabe M, Oka M (1995) Irinotecan (CPT-11) and characteristic mucosal changes in the mouse ileum and cecum. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(24):1876–1883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips TD (1999) Dietary clay in the chemoprevention of aflatoxin-induced disease. Toxicol Sci 52(2 Suppl):118–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang JS, Luo H, Billam M, Wang Z, Guan H, Tang L, Goldston T, Afriyie-Gyawu E, Lovett C, Griswold J, Brattin B, Taylor RJ, Huebner HJ, Phillips TD (2005) Short-term safety evaluation of processed calcium montmorillonite clay (NovaSil) in humans. Food Addit Contam 22(3):270–279. doi:10.1080/02652030500111129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Catimel G, Chabot GG, Guastalla JP, Dumortier A, Cote C, Engel C, Gouyette A, Mathieu-Boué A, Mahjoubi M, Clavel M (1995) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 6(2):133–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Asao T, Buechi G, Chang SB, Abdel-Kader MM, Wick EL, Wogan GN (1965) The structures of aflatoxins B and G. J Am Chem Soc 87:882–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Han KA, Carpenter RH (2008) Calcium aluminosilicate (CAS) in the treatment of intractable diarrhea in dogs with cancer. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med 6:181–184

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Chou C, Harle MT, Morrissey M, Engstrom MC (2000) Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer 89(7):1634–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kahouli I, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Prakash S (2013) Probiotics in colorectal cancer (CRC) with emphasis on mechanisms of action and current perspectives. J Med Microbiol 62(Pt 8):1107–1123. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.048975-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fuccio L, Guido A, Eusebi LH, Laterza L, Grilli D, Cennamo V, Ceroni L, Barbieri E, Bazzoli F (2009) Effects of probiotics for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced diarrhea. J Clin Gastroenterol 43(6):506–513. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181a1f59c

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gibson RJ, Keefe DM, Lalla RV, Bateman E, Blijlevens N, Fijlstra M, King EE, Stringer AM, van der Velden WJ, Yazbeck R, Elad S, Bowen JM, (MASCC/ISOO) MSGotMAoSCiCISoOO (2013) Systematic review of agents for the management of gastrointestinal mucositis in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 21(1):313–326. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1644-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takeda Y, Kobayashi K, Akiyama Y, Soma T, Handa S, Kudoh S, Kudo K (2001) Prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation in cancer patients. Int J Cancer 92(2):269–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zachariah B, Gwede CK, James J, Ajani J, Chin LJ, Donath D, Rosenthal SA, Kane BL, Rotman M, Berk L, Kachnic LA (2010) Octreotide acetate in prevention of chemoradiation-induced diarrhea in anorectal cancer: randomized RTOG trial 0315. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(8):547–556. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq063

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ychou M, Douillard JY, Rougier P, Adenis A, Mousseau M, Dufour P, Wendling JL, Burki F, Mignard D, Marty M (2000) Randomized comparison of prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment versus no prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment in patients receiving CPT-11 (irinotecan) for advanced 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer: an open-label multicenter phase II study. Am J Clin Oncol 23(2):143–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Flieger D, Klassert C, Hainke S, Keller R, Kleinschmidt R, Fischbach W (2007) Phase II clinical trial for prevention of delayed diarrhea with cholestyramine/levofloxacin in the second-line treatment with irinotecan biweekly in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Oncology 72(1–2):10–16. doi:10.1159/000111083

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Michael M, Brittain M, Nagai J, Feld R, Hedley D, Oza A, Siu L, Moore MJ (2004) Phase II study of activated charcoal to prevent irinotecan-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4410–4417. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.11.125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute Grant U10 CA045809. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI. The study drug and placebo and additional funding for research nursing support were received by Dr. Fisch on behalf of the MD Anderson Community Clinical Oncology Program from Salient Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Fisch and the study team have full control of all of the primary data, and the Journal of Supportive Care in Cancer may review the data upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan K. Kee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kee, B.K., Morris, J.S., Slack, R.S. et al. A phase II, randomized, double blind trial of calcium aluminosilicate clay versus placebo for the prevention of diarrhea in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan. Support Care Cancer 23, 661–670 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2402-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2402-1

Keywords

Navigation