Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using current perception threshold and clinical evaluations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is increasing with introduction of new and combination cancer pharmacotherapies. This study evaluated associations between clinical and self-report measurements and current perception threshold (CPT), a neuroselective measure of sensory nerve function that may detect asymptomatic CIPN damage.

Methods

Data for this secondary analysis were from a prospective, observational study using CPT to evaluate CIPN. Bivariate mixed models, accounting for the intraclass correlation between repeated patient assessments, were used to assess the relationship between CPT at each frequency (5, 250, and 2,000 Hz) and each subjective measure (Neuropathic Pain Scale, FACT-GOGntx) and objective measurement (quantitative sensory testing, deep tendon reflexes, and grip strength).

Results

A total of 29 chemotherapy-naïve subjects with various cancer types had a mean age of 56.7 (SD 10.4); nine subjects developed CIPN grade >1 using NCI CTC-AE criteria. Cold detection thresholds were inversely associated with CPT 5 [b(95 % CI) = −2.5(−4.5, −0.5)] and CPT 2,000 [−7.5(−11.8, −3.3)] frequencies. FACT GOG-ntx quality of life (QoL) scale and neurotoxicity and function subscales were inversely associated with CPT 2,000 [−1.8 (−3.5, −0.05), −2.2 (−4.2, −0.2), and −5.4 (−9.8, −0.9), respectively], indicating worsening QoL, impairment, and function as hypoesthesia increases.

Conclusions

CPT 2,000 may identify impending worsening of patient-reported outcomes such as QoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards BK et al (2005) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(19):1407–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and health (ICF)

  3. Lee JJ, Swain SM (2006) Peripheral neuropathy induced by microtubule-stabilizing agents. J Clin Oncol 24(10):1633–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mielke S, Sparreboom A, Mross K (2006) Peripheral neuropathy: a persisting challenge in paclitaxel-based regimes. Eur J Cancer 42(1):24–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Postma TJ, Heimans JJ (2000) Grading of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Ann Oncol 11(5):509–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quasthoff S, Hartung HP (2002) Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol 249(1):9–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaudhry V et al (1994) Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of nerve conduction measurements in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 44(8):1459–1462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Polomano RC et al (2001) A painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat produced by the chemotherapeutic drug, paclitaxel. Pain 94(3):293–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roytta M, Raine CS (1985) Taxol-induced neuropathy: further ultrastructural studies of nerve fibre changes in situ. J Neurocytol 14(1):157–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dougherty PM et al (2004) Taxol-induced sensory disturbance is characterized by preferential impairment of myelinated fiber function in cancer patients. Pain 109(1–2):132–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer SJ et al (2001) Alterations in cell cycle regulation underlie cisplatin induced apoptosis of dorsal root ganglion neurons in vivo. Neurobiol Dis 8(6):1027–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Andre T et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2343–2351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A et al (2003) CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 13(3):176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oken MM et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller AB et al (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47(1):207–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavaletti G et al (2006) Multi-center assessment of the Total Neuropathy Score for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. J Peripher Nerv Syst 11(2):135–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf S et al (2008) Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: prevention and treatment strategies. Eur J Cancer 44(11):1507–1515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma L et al (2012) Single application of A2 NTX, a botulinum toxin A2 subunit, prevents chronic pain over long periods in both diabetic and spinal cord injury-induced neuropathic pain models. J Pharmacol Sci 119(3):282–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsumoto M et al (2006) Characterization of three different sensory fibers by use of neonatal capsaicin treatment, spinal antagonism and a novel electrical stimulation-induced paw flexion test. Mol Pain 2:16

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsumoto M et al (2008) Pharmacological switch in Abeta-fiber stimulation-induced spinal transmission in mice with partial sciatic nerve injury. Mol Pain 4:25

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koga K et al (2005) Selective activation of primary afferent fibers evaluated by sine-wave electrical stimulation. Mol Pain 1:13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Katims JJ et al (1987) Constant current sine wave transcutaneous nerve stimulation for the evaluation of peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68(4):210–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takekuma K et al (2000) Age and gender differences in skin sensory threshold assessed by current perception in community dwelling Japanese. J Epidemiol 10(1):S33–S38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rendell MS et al (1989) Mapping diabetic sensory neuropathy by current perception threshold testing. Diabetes Care 12(9):636–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rendell MS et al (1989) A comparison of nerve conduction velocities and current perception thresholds as correlates of clinical severity of diabetic sensory neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52(4):502–511

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Masson EA, Boulton AJ (1991) The Neurometer: validation and comparison with conventional tests for diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 8(Spec No):S63–S66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishimura H et al (2004) Weekly paclitaxel therapy for locoregional lymph node recurrence of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 31(4):627–630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tack CJ et al (1994) Comparison of clinical examination, current and vibratory perception threshold in diabetic polyneuropathy. Neth J Med 44(2):41–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Doi D et al (2003) Evaluation of the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin by current perception threshold in ovarian cancer patients. J Nihon Med Sch 70(2):129–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C et al (2006) Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 123(3):231–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cavaletti G et al (2013) The chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy outcome measures standardization study: from consensus to the first validity and reliability findings. Ann Oncol 24(2):454–462

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Galer BS, Jensen MP (1997) Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain: the Neuropathic Pain Scale. Neurology 48(2):332–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Calhoun EA et al (2003) Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (Fact/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13(6):741–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang HQ et al (2007) Validation and reduction of FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale for platinum/paclitaxel-induced neurologic symptoms: a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(2):387–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bell-Krotoski JA et al (1995) Threshold detection and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Ther 8(2):155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. de Sonnaville JJ et al (1997) The prevalence and determinants of foot ulceration in type II diabetic patients in a primary health care setting. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 35(2–3):149–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Felix E, Widerstrom E (2009) Reliability and validity of quantitative sensory testing in persons with spinal cord injury and neuropathic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev 46:69–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hilz MJ, Dutsch M, Neundorfer B (1998) Autonomic disorders in polyneuropathies. Med Klin (Munich) 93(9):533–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Martina IS et al (1998) Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 65(5):743–747

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Merkies IS et al (2000) Reliability and responsiveness of a graduated tuning fork in immune mediated polyneuropathies. The Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68(5):669–671

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Smieja M et al (1999) Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research. J Gen Intern Med 14(7):418–424

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hallett M (1993) NINDS myotatic reflex scale. Neurology 43(12):2723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Richardson JK (2002) The clinical identification of peripheral neuropathy among older persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(11):1553–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fauci AS et al (ed) (2012) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 18ed.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of Sharon Gordon, DDS, MPH, PhD, University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Dentistry; and Raymond Dionne, DDS, PhD, Food and Drug Administration for their critical input into study conceptualization and design. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, the Department of Defense, or the United States government. This study was funded by the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Nursing Research grant, P30 University of Maryland, Baltimore Center for Pain Studies to S.G. Dorsey (NRO11396-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kathleen A. Griffith or Cynthia L. Renn.

Additional information

Kathleen A. Griffith and Darren J. Couture are the co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffith, K.A., Couture, D.J., Zhu, S. et al. Evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy using current perception threshold and clinical evaluations. Support Care Cancer 22, 1161–1169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2068-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2068-0

Keywords

Navigation